Chennai Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L.Kanagaraj Vs. Inspector of Police at Alangayam Police Station
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.05.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.14270 of 2013 L.Kanagaraj .Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Alangayam Police Station, Vellore District.Respondent Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant permission and protection to conduct cultural program (Dance and Music Program) in the Sr.Mariyamman Temple situated at Jambu Pallam, Kothakottai Post, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Vellore District scheduled to be held on 21.05.2013 from 7.00 p.m to 11.00 p.m.For Petitioner : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Additional Govt. Pleader ORDER The Petitioner sent a representation, dated 10.05.2013, to the Respondent/ Inspector of Police, Alangayam Police Station, Vellore District for conducting cultural programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 21.05.2013. 2.According to th...
R.Ashokan Vs. Inspector of Police at Senthamangalam Police Station
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.05.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.14312 of 2013 R.Ashokan .Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Senthamangalam Police Station, Namakkal Taluk & District.Respondent Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent authority to give permission to conduct the dance programme at Nadutheru, Palayapalayam Village, Namakkal Taluk & District in festival of Palayapalayam Sr.Bagavathiamman Koil Thiruvila on 28.05.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sathees Kumar For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Additional Govt. Pleader ORDER The Petitioner sent a representation, dated 10.05.2013, to the Respondent/ Inspector of Police, Senthamangalam Police Station, Namakkal Taluk & District for conducting cultural programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 28.05.2013. 2.According to the Learned Counsel for t...
Kannan Vs. Inspector of Police at Nallipalayam Police Station
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.05.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.14339 of 2013 Kannan .Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Nallipalayam Police Station, Namakkal District.Respondent Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide permission to conduct village folk and cinema dance and other cultural programmes on 29.05.2013 at Arulmigu Mariamman Temple, Nallipalayam, Namakkal District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Addl. Govt. Pleader ORDER The Petitioner sent a representation, dated 13.05.2013, to the Respondent/Inspector of Police, Nallipalayam Police Station, Namakkal District, for conducting cultural programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 29.05.2013. 2.According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Respondent/Police has not passed any orders based on ...
C.Dinakaran Vs. Inspector of Police at Thimmam Pettai Police Station
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.05.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.14260 of 2013 C.Dinakaran .Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Thimmam Pettai Police Station, Vellore District.Respondent Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide permission and protection to conduct cultural program (Dance and Music Program) in the Avarangkuppam Sr.Mariyamman Temple situated at Avarangkuppam (Via) & Post, Vaniyambadi-Taluk, Vellore District, Scheduled to be held on 28.05.2013 from 7.00 pm to 11.00 pm. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss For Respondent : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Spl. Govt. Pleader ORDER The Petitioner sent a representation, dated 05.05.2013, to the Respondent/Inspector of Police, Thimmam Pettai Police Station, Vellore District, for conducting cultural programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 28.05.2...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Rajendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-15-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 05/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.491 of 2012 The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Billars Gate Opposite Anna Stadium, Palmore Road, Nagercoil - 629 001. .. Appellant vs 1.Rajendran 2.Thankam 3.Rani .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 27.12.2010, passed in M.C.O.P.No.14 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli. !For Appellant .. Mr.D.Sivaraman ^For Respondent .. Mr.V.Sasikumar for R1 and R2 No Appearance for R3 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.No.491 of 2012, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.14 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.2. The Short facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner, who...
The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.Murugan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-15-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 05/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.827 of 2012 The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Opposite to District Court, Sub-Collector Office Road, Dindigul. .. Appellant vs 1.Murugan 2.Krishnan 3.Savithri .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 21.06.2011, passed in M.C.O.P.No.4 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindigul. !For Appellant .. Mr.J.S.Murali ^For Respondent .. Mr.A.Saravanan for R1 No Appearance for R2 and R3 :JUDGMENT The appellant/3rd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.827 of 2012, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.4 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindigul.2. The Short facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner has...
Jayanth Bhattacharjee Vs. Lalit Steel Suppliers
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. / 05 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.R.C.No.983 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1 of 2011 and 2 of 2011 Jayanth Bhattacharjee ... Petitioner Vs. M/s.Lalit Steel Suppliers, Rep. by its Partner, Mr.Rakeshkumar Jain, No.5, New No.3E, Zones Street, First Floor, Chennai - 600 001. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set-aside the judgment of the Special Metropolitan Magistrate / XIV Small Causes Court, Chennai dated 30.09.2008 in S.T.C.No.1461 of 2007 and the judgment of the learned IV Additional Sessions Court, Chennai dated 25.03.2011 passed in C.A.No.286 of 2008, consequently acquit the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kumaresan For Respondent : Mr.V.Sairam For Mr.R.Amizhdhu ******* ORDER The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The respondent herein / complainant had filed a case in S.T.C.No.1461 of 2007, on the file of Special Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, ag...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. 1.Ravichandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-15-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 05/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.457 of 2006 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2302 of 2006 National Insurance Company Limited Rep. by its Branch Manager, Thallakumam, Madurai. ... Appellant Vs 1.Ravichandran 2.Senthilkumar ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the fair and decreetal order dated 08.08.2005 made in M.C.O.P.No.166 of 2004, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. !For Appellant .. Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan ^For Respondents .. Mr.A.Saravanan for R-1 No appearance for R-2 :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.166 of 2004, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim...
Tamil Nadu Cricket Association Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14/05/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL And THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.14306 of 2013 THE TAMIL NADU CRICKET ASSOCIATION, REP. BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY, MR.K.S.VISWANATHAN, NO.5, VICTORIA HOSTEL ROAD, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5. VS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BUILDING (CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE) CIRCLE, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GREATER CHENNAI POLICE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Justice M.Venugopal) The Petitioner/Tamil Nadu Cricket Association has filed the present Writ Petition for issuance of Writ of Certiorari in calling for the records of the Second Respondent/the Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Building (Construction & Maintenance) Circle, Chepauk, Chennai-5, in letter No.DB/D5/...
M/S. the India Cements Ltd. Vs. Cce, Trichy
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: May-08-2013
P.K. Das The relevant facts of the case as revealed from the record, in brief, are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Cement. They were availing CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. By a show-cause notice dated 19.2.2009, it has been alleged that during the period from April 2006 to May 2008, the appellant availed irregular credit on capital goods, namely MS Angles, MS Beams, MS Channels and TMT bars classifiable under heading 72, 73 and 74 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It has further been alleged that the Chapter heading of these items were not covered under the definition of capital goods under Rule 2(a) of the said Rules, 2004. Further, these items were not used in the manufacture of finished products. The learned Commissioner confirmed the demand of CENVAT of Rs.53,23,756/- under proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, 2004 along with interest under Section 11AB of the Ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »