Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Rajam Hepsy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.6441 of 2005 Mrs.R.Rajam Hepsy .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government Social Welfare Department Fort St.George Chenna009. 2. The Commissioner for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled Mylapore Chenna014. 3. The District Disabled Rehabilitation Officer Rehabilitation Centre Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District 4. The Correspondent C.S.I. High School for the Deaf Kottara703. Kanyakumari District .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent relating to his proceedings in O.Mu.No.1208/03 dated 19.05.2004 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the appointment of the petitioner with all attendant benefits from 29.05.2003. For Petitioner :: Mrs.Lita Srinivasan For Respondents :: Mr.N.Srinivasan Additio...
E.Durai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 04.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN W.P.No.23514 of 2006 E.Durai .. Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chenna009. 2. The Commissioner and Director of Land Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chenna005. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent herein vide Letter No.42792/Ni/A3 (1) / 99-23, dated 05.04.2006 and quash the same same as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, being violative of Rules and principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents herein to implement the Government Order in G.O (1D) No.34, Revenue Department, dated 29.01.1999 and consider the petitioner for further promotions notionally with all consequential monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner :...
Astek Electricals and Controls Vs. the Assistant Commissionerct
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated ::18. .04..2013 Coram :: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan Writ Petition No:6672. of 2013 M/s. Astek Electricals and Controls No:138. B, M.B.T. Road Navalpur Ranipet Vellore District. ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Ranipet Vellore District.2. The Commercial Tax Officer Enforcement, Group I Ranipet Vellore District.3. The Branch Manager Canara Bank Vellore Main Branch Vellor004. Vellore District. ... Respondents .. .. .. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in his notice issued in Form U (Notice for recovery of money) dated 27.02.2013 to the Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Vellore Main Branch, Vellor004. the 3rd respondent attaching the Bank Account of the petitioner quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent herein to lift the attachment of the Bank Account of the pe...
Prabhakar Rao Mallela Vs. the Goc-in-c, Hq Western Command, Chandimand ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
V. Periya Karuppiah, J. 1. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for calling records pertaining to the dismissal order dated 20.10.2009 in No. 1029/018/NE-II/NEandPEN/Gp/2009 as informed by the second respondent vide his letter dated 07.04.2011 and to quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service or alternatively to discharge him from service with honour and to grant all consequential benefits. 2. The case of the applicant as stated in the application would be as follows:- The applicant was enrolled in the Indian Army on 27.08.1997 in the Corps of EME as CFN/TCM(Line) and completed his training in January 2001 and was posted to 610 EME Battalion, 810 EME Workshop, C/o/ 56 APO. He served around 9 years with a clean personal record. 3. He was granted casual leave for 17 days from 04.05.2006 to 20.05.2006. When he reached home, he saw his father suffering from chronic disease and was in serious condition and therefore he requested his O...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Aicte
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:17::04::2013 Coram: The Honble Mr.R.K.AGRAWAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honble Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Appeal No. 1794 of 2012 & Writ Petition No.22832 of 2012 and connected miscellaneous petitions -------- W.A.No. 1794 of 2012 The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai -600 009. Appellant vs.1. All India Council for Technical Education, 7th Floor, Chanderlok Building, Janpath, New Delh001. 2. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delh001. 3. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, New Delh001. Respondents W.P.No.22832 of 2012 Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Technical Education SC/ST Employees Welfare Association, Rep. by its General Secretary, P.S.Shenbagaraja, AMB...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Abt Industries Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17. 04-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Tax Case (Appeal) No.31 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore. .... Appellant Versus A.B.T. Industries Ltd., 10/14-15 Kalingatayan Street Ramnagar Coimbatore ... Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "D" Bench, dated 23.2.2006, in I.T.A No.2357/Mds/2004, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2001-02. For Appellant: Mr.N.V.Balaji Standing Counsel for I.T. For Respondent: Mr.R.Meenakshisundaram JUDGMENT K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.The Revenue is on appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 2001-2002.2. The assessee is a company. The assessment was completed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act on 24.2.2003. The Assessing Officer, while completing the assessment gave credit for TDS amo...
Shri Rajasthani JaIn Samaj Educational Trust Vs. K.Rohini
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17. / 04 / 2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.S.NO.231 OF 200.Shri Rajasthani Jain Samaj Educational Trust Represented by its Managing Trustee Harish L. Mehta Son of Dr.C.L. Mehta No.62, Bakrit Road, T.Nagar, Chenna017. .. Plaintiff Versus 1. K.Rohini 2. K.Kalyani 3. V.Narasimhan 4. K.Sundaram 5. K.Venkatachalapathy 6. R.Govindarajan 7. Dhandapani 8. V.Subramanyan 9. V.Rajappa 10. The Estate of M.V.Arunachalam Represented by his legal heir A.Ravichandran not II, Rangappa Reddy, West Mambalam, Chenna033. .. Defendants PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 C.P.C. for a judgment and decree against the defendants as follows: (a) for division of the suit property between the plaintiff and defendants by metes and bounds in the light of their right, entitlement thereto in the ratio of 58.33% and 41.67% respectively. (b) for a direction to appoint an Advocate Commissione...
Registrar General of High Court of Madras Vs. K.Elango
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:17. 04.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.20485 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chenna104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.K.Elango 2.The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Information Commission, No.2, Sir Thyegaraya Salai, Teynampet, Chenna018. .. Respondents (R2 impleaded as per order dated 04.10.2012 in M.P.2/2012) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for an issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Case No.10447/Enquiry/A/11 dated 10.01.2012 of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi For 1st Respondent : Party in Person For 2nd Respondent : Mr.G.Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel For M/s.G.R. Associates ORDER M.VENUGOPAL,J.The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ Petition as against the order dated 10.01.2012 in Case No.10447/Enqui...
T.Madanagiriyappa Vs. Director of School Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17. 4.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.1279 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 T.Madanagiriyappa .. Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Director of School Education College Road, Nungambakkam Chenna006. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 3.The Chief Educational Officer Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Hosur 5.Smt.Kusumakumari Headmistress Panchayat Union Primary School Midigrippalli Hosur Cattle Farms (Post) Hosu110. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the letter in Na.Ka.No.012/A1/00 dated 14.08.2006 passed by the 4th respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper against the violation of principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents 1 to 4 to promote the petitioner as Headmaster with retrospec...
Registrar General of the High Court of Madras Vs. K.U.Rajasekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17. 04.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.23448 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chenna104. ... Petitioner Vs. K.U.Rajasekar ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in Case No.40997/Enquiry/A/2011, dated 02.07.2012 of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi For Respondent : Mr.K.U.Rajasekar Party in person. ORDER M.VENUGOPAL,J The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ of Certiorari, praying for issuance of an order in calling for the records in Case No.40997/Enquiry/A/2011, dated 02.07.2012, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai and quash the same. 2.Earlier, the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai, while passing orders in Case N...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »