Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ex Sep a Karunai Udaiyarajan Vs. Union of India, - Represented by the ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Apr-19-2013
V. PeriyaKaruppiah, Member-Judicial: 1. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for a direction to call for the records in respect of the proceedings No.A/2406002/525/DV-3 dated 30.11.2011, issued under the signature of 2nd respondent and forwarded by 3rd respondent in the letter dated 31.1.2012 arising out unactioned and returned non-statutory petition of February, 2011 and to quash the same and to further lift the regimental veil in not considering the statutory petition dated 22.12.2011 filed under Section-164 of the Army Act and also to direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all consequential and attendant benefits in the substantial interest of equity and fairness within the time limit and also to pass suitable other directions. 2. The case of the applicant as stated in the application would be as follows :- The applicant was enrolled as a Sepoy in the Madras Regiment on 26.6.2002. After undergoing training, he was posted to 27 MADRAS....
C.R.Ramanath Vs. District Collector of Krishnagiri District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 18.04.2013 Coram:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.Raja Writ Petition No.25673 of 2008 & MP Nos.1/08 and 1/09 1. C.R.Ramanath 2. K.Balasubramaniam 3. Doraisamy 4. M.Saroja 5. C.Periyasamy 6. K.Arumugam 7. K.Arumugam .. Petitioners Vs.1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur.3. The Divisional Engineer, Highways and Rural Works Department, Krishnagiri.4. The Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.5. The Commissioner, Hosur Municipality, Hosur.6. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.7. The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus as stated therein. For petitioners : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan, Sr.Counsel for Mr.K.Goviganesan. For R1 to R6 : Mr.S.V.Duraisolaimalai, AGP For R7 : Mr.N.Subbarayalu. O R D E R The petitioners h...
1.M.Ocha thevar Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.1369 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.263 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.881 of 2013 and W.P.(MD)No.993 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2,3,1,2,2,3,2 and 3 o1. M.Ocha Thevar 2.M.Eswaran ... Petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.1369/2013 1.O.Mani 2.O.Ramu 3.O.Subramani ... Petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.263/2013 1.Pooncholai 2.Karuppiah 3.Murugan ... Petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.881/2013 1.R.Subramani 2.R.Parameswaran ... Petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.993/2013 Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Chief Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, represented by its Managing Director, No.331, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. 4.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Madurai Special Division, Madurai Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625 016. 5.The Ta...
D.Sudhakarrasu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.3093 of 2012 D.Sudhakarrasu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chenna009. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 15. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.M.Hidayathullah Khan, GA(F) ORDER The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Forester in the panel drawn for the year 2006-2007, 2007-2008 or atleast in the panel for the year 2008-2009 in the appropriate place and further to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner notionally in the post of Forester with all consequential service and monetary benefits...
M.Venkatachalam Vs. Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 18 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.7969 of 2005 M.Venkatachalam .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board, Kuralagam, Chenna108. 2.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board, Kuralagam, Chenna108. 3.The Assistant Director, Khadi and Village Industries, Tanjore. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in its Board Proceedings (Ms)No.40, dated 8.7.2004 and quash the same. For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondents ... Mr.S.K.Bose ORDER The writ petition has been filed by one M.Venkatachalam challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent Board in his proceedings (Ms)No.40, dated 8.7.2004 wherein, the Board has confirmed the major punishment of dismissal from service. ...
Manonmani Sundarraj Vs. Jalal Hajee Abdul Karim Sahib Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.420 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Manonmani Sundarraj (deceased) 1. Dinakaran 2. Manoharan 3. Baskaran .. Appellants Vs. Jalal Hajee Abdul Karim Sahib Trust rep.by its Secretary and Managing Trustee, J.A.Rahman .. Respondent This second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2010 passed by the learned V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in A.S.No.448 of 2008 confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2007 passed by the learned I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.6327 of 2005. For appellants : Mr.A.R.Anbarasan for Mr.R.Tholgappian JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the defendants, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2010 passed by the learned V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in A.S.No.448 of 2008 confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2007 passed by the learned I Assist...
N.P.C.Jesudian Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.17 of 2007 N.P.C.Jesudian Board Member (Retired) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board 'Y' Block, 109/A Plot No.4445, Anna Nagar Chenna040. .. Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board 800, Anna Salai Chenna2. The Member (Accounts) Tamilnadu Electricity Board 800, Anna Salai Chenna3. The Secretary Secretariat Branch Tamilnadu Electricity Board 800, Anna Salai Chennai 2 .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the form of writ to call for the records connected with the Memorandum issued in No.62087/A5/A52/98-44 dated 28.10.2006 passed by the 3rd respondent and Memo not M(A)/EA/DP/Enq./031/2006 dated 16.12.2006 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to proceed further on the report ...
Pari Alias Fathima Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.15378 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 Pari alias Fathima ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Regional Passport Officer, O/o.Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Road, Race Course, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent by his proceedings in File No.1200024-CPC-MDU dated 13.08.2012 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially, to direct the second respondent to issue the renewed passport of the petitioner within a stipulated period. !For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff ^For Respondent No.1 ... Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 ... Mr.S.Sivasubramanian ****** :ORDER ******* Th...
F.Ramesh Vs. Ramalingam Investments
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR CRP.(NPD).No.1519 of 2013 F.Ramesh .. Petitioner Versus M/s.Ramalingam Investments Salem represented by its Managing Partner K.Sridharan .. Respondent The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 23.09.2011 passed in I.A.No.74 of 2009 in I.P.No.46 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jagadeesan ................. ORDER Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree made in I.A.No.74 of 2009 dated 23.09.2011 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, refusing to condone the delay of 662 days in filing an application to set aside the ex parte decree dated 25.09.2007, the present Revision Petition has been filed.2. Material on record discloses that the revision petitioner is the second respondent in I.P.No.46 of 1997 on the file of the learned Principal Su...
G.Annadurai Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:18. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR CRP (NPD) No.1633 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 G.Annadurai ... Petitioner ..Vs..1. The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.2. The Tahsildhar, Shozhinganallur Taluk Officer, Kanchipuram District.3. The Commissioner, Chennai City Corporation, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the order of maintainability in Civil Court passed in O.S.S.R.No.13504 of 2012. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Margabandhu O R D E R Material on record discloses that 27 cents of land in Survey No.253/2, is vested with Enjambakkam Panchayath Board. According to the Revision petitioner / plaintiff, that the panchayat passed a resolution dated 06.10.2010, expressing its willingness for assignment of house sites, in Survey No.253/2, for all those persons residing there.2. It is also the case of the Revision petitioner /...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »