Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Nagajothi Vs. Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.21979 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.3 & 2 of 2012 M.Nagajothi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28. 2.The District Registrar, Cambind Registrar Office, Pol naickenpettai, Tuticorin 2.3. The Sub-Registrar, Keelur Sub-Registrar Office, Pol naickenpettai, Tuticorin 2.4. G.Munirathinam 5. Minor M.Sakthi Mageswari rep. by her father and natural Guardian ... Respondents PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Proceedings Na.Ka.No.2126/A1/2012 dated 06.07.2012 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subburaj For Respondents : Mr.M.Dig Vijay Pandian Additional Government Pleader O R D E R The 4th respondent owned 68 cents of land at Tuticorin. The 4th respondent ...
Veejay Marketing Vs. Asst Commr of Incometax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :1. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.VIMALA T.C(A)No.2671 and 2672 of 2006 M/s.Veejay Marketing, 8, ATT Colony, Coimbator018. ... Appellant in both appeals Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle III, Coimbatore. ... Respondent in both appeals Prayer: These Tax Cases (Appeal) are filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'D' in ITA Nos.1515/Mds/2002 and 1516/Mds/2002, dated 6.9.2005 respectively. For Appellant : Mr.C.V.Rajan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar For Respondent : Mr.N.V.Balaji N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J. These appeals are filed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal made in I.T.A.Nos.1515 and 1516 of 2002 dated 6.9.2005, confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) relating to the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95.2. These tax cas...
Flsmidth Pvt.Ltd Vs. Secan Invescast India Pltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A.No.314 of 2012 M/s.FLSmidth Pvt.Ltd., having its Office at FL Smidth House, 34,Egatoor, Kelambakkam, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chenna103. represented by its Power of Attorney Holder, Mr.V.Rajagopalan ... Appellant Vs. M/s.Secan Invescast (India) Pvt.Ltd., having its address at S.F.No.504/2C, L&T By Pass Road, Near ARC Parcel Service, Eachanari P.O., Coimbator021. ... Respondent Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S.Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 10.07.2012 made in O.A.No.356 of 2012 in C.S.No.292 of 2012 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.Vijay Narayan Senior Counsel for Mr.Ananth Padmanabhan For Respondent : Mr.Murari, Senior Counsel for Ms.Hema Srinivasan Thriyambak JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI,J.Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge dated 10.7.2...
N.Chellaiah Vs. State by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.172 of 2006 N.Chellaiah ... Appellant Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, Murappanadu Police Station, Crime No.65 of 2000. ... Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in S.C.No.369 of 2001, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, [Fast Track Court not I], Tuticorin, dated 07.10.2003 and set aside the same. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Ramasamy ^For Respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor - - - - - :JUDGMENT ************* [Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.369 of 2001, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, [Fast Track Court not I], Tuticorin. He stood charged for offences under Sections 341, 302, 326 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code...
Dr.C.S.Rex Sargunam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.4184 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 Dr.C.S.Rex Sargunam, President, Tamilnadu Health Development Association, 21-G.K. Industrial Estate, Arcot Road, Porur, Chennai-600 116. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Voluntary Health Services, represented by its Honorary Secretary, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Adyar, Chennai-600 113. 3.Then Chennai V.H.S. Maruthuvamanai Anna Thozhir Sangam, (Regn.No.1858/MDS) rep by its General Secretary, 1163/3A, 1st Cross Street, Sulaima Nagar, Mettukuppam, Chennai-600 097. (R-3 impleaded as per order dated 23.04.2012 in M.P.No.4 of 2012) .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the repres...
Pl.thenappan Vs. S.Thanu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:1. 2.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.4258 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 PL.Thenappan Petitioner vs.1. S.Thanu 2. K.Raghunathan 3. A.Kothandaramaiah 4. Chola Poonurangam 5. J.V.Rukmangathan 6. K.Murugan 7. Kalaipuli G.Sekar 8. S.Muthusamy 9. K.S.Srinivasan Respondents Civil Revision Petition to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 15.11.2012 passed in I.A.No.15857 of 2012 in O.S.No.6567 of 2012 on the file of the XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and quash the same. For petitioner : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel for Mr.T.K.S.Gandhi For R1 : Mr.V.T.Gopalan, Senior Counsel for Ms.R.Maheswari For RR2, 3 & 5 to 9 : Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Senior Counsel for Mr.Sagadevan For R4 : Mr.T.Thiyageswaran ORDER First respondent herein filed the suit in O.S.No.6567 of 2012 on the file of the XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras for declaration that the Extra-ordinary/Special General Body...
K.Balamurugan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.1416 of 2012 K.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.M.Mariyammal 4.N.Pandiammal 5.A.Muthuselvam 6.M.Ramaprabha 7.P.Nallasamy 8.Thilagavathy 9.A.A.Muthusamy 10.Mathammal 11.K.Annadurai 12.Radha 13.N.Baranidhasan 14.M.Muthalif 15.The District Social Welfare Officer, Dindigul District. 16.The District Collector, Dindigul District. [R-7 to R15 are suo motu impleaded as per order dated 10.01.2013]. [R-16 is impleaded as per order dated 18.01.10213]. ... Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the detenu, namely Eswar, aged one year before this Court and hand over his custody ...
State Rep. by Vs. 1.Murugan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD) No.453 of 2005 State rep. by The Asst.Superintendent of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.19/2001) .. Appellant vs. 1.Murugan 2.Selvam 3.Kandasamy 4.Raju 5.Alangaram Pillai 6.Balasubramanian .. Respondents Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Cr.P.C against the Judgment dated 03.05.2005 in S.C.No.10/2002 on the file of the Second Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. !For appellant ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor ^For respondents- 1, 2, 5 and 6 ... Mr.S.Mahendrapathy, Legal Aid Counsel For respondents 3 and 4... Mr.S.Kanagarajan :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) This is an Appeal against acquittal. The respondents are the accused in S.C.No.10 of 2002 on the file of the Second Additional District and Sessions Judg...
Vasumathi Vs. M.R.Anbarasu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.Nos.398 and 399 of 2013 in C.S.No.902 of 2008 Vasumathi vs M.R.Anbarasu FOR PETITIONER : PaisLobo FOR RESPONDENT : S.Sundar ORDER: VINOD K. SHARMA,J., A.No.398 of 2013: This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of the O.S.Rules r/w Order XL Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed with prayer to appoint a Receiver to manage and collect the income from the Schedule properties and deposit the same in the Court, after deducting the expenses for paying the Government Taxes, maintenance charges of the properties and his remuneration as may be fixed by this Honble Court. A.No.399 of 2013: This application has been moved to direct the defendants 1 and 2 to furnish a true account of income from the schedule properties item No.1 to 4 to the Court from the date of the applicant mother's death on 23.04.2007 till the appointment of the Receiver.2. The plaintiff/appli...
R.Kousalya Vs. Director of Collegiate Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.20684 of 2012 R.Kousalya .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Collegiate Education, College Road, Chenna006. 2.The Joint Director of College Education, Coimbatore Zone, Coimbatore 18. 3.The Secretary, CBM College, Sakethapuri, Kovai Pudur, Coimbatore 42. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to forward the pension proposal of the Petitioner's husband Late K.Rangasamy to the second respondent and direct the second respondent to sanction family pension and all other monetary benefits to the petitioner including arrears. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kannankumar For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram Addl.G.P. For R1 and R2 Mr.P.Muthukrishnan for R3 O R D E R The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking for a direction to the third respondent College to forward the pen...