Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L.Omana Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.67 of 2013 L.Omana .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakmari District. 3.Senthil Kumar .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to secure the daughter of the petitioner, namely, K.Priya, aged 20 years, from the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent herein, and produce before this Court and set her at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.P.Mahendran ^For respondents 1 and 2... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor For 3rd respondent ... Mr.C.T.Perumal :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to ...
V.Govinda Rajasekaran Vs. General Manager of Tamil Nadu State Transpor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.2461 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 V.Govinda Rajasekaran .. Petitioner Vs. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Limited, 37,Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043. .. Respondent This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the entire domestic enquiry proceedings in No.1/G5/102/Tha.A.Po.Ka/2012, dated 07.04.2012 initiated by the respondent herein against the petitioner as null and void. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Mouli - - - - ORDER The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to declare the entire domestic enquiry proceedings, dated 7.4.2012 as null and void. 2.The petitioner, who was working as a Driver in the respondent Transport Corporation, was involved in an accident while he was driving a vehicle on 13.3.2012. On account of the said accide...
M/S.National Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.K.Mayakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1231 of 2008 M/s.National Insurance Company Limited, Represented through its Divisional Manager, North Veli Street, Madurai. ... Appellant Vs. 1.K.Mayakrishnan 2.A.Rajkumar ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the order dated 24.04.2008 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madurai in W.C.No.364 of 2004. !For Appellant ... M/s.P.Malini ^For Respondents... Mr.K.Kumaravel for R-1 No appearance for R-2 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the order passed in W.C.No.364 of 2004, on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madurai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in W.C.No.364 of 2004, claiming compensation of Rs.5,37,600/- from the respondents for the injurie...
Mrs.Mallika Vs. Salem Highways Officials Coop
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01.02.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRP(NPD)Nos.854 & 855 of 2006 Mrs.Mallika .... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Salem Highways Officials Co-op House Building Society Ltd., Nedunchalai Nagar, Salem 5 rep. by its Secretary. 2.G.Jayavel 3.Mr.M.Elango ..... Respondents Prayer in CRP(NPD)Nos.854 of 2006: This civil revision is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 14.02.2006 and made in I.A.No.654 of 2006 in O.S.No.546 of 1996 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif at Salem. Prayer in CRP(NPD)No.855 of 2006: This civil revision is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 14.02.2006 and made in I.A.No.381 of 2005 in O.S.No.1062 of 1994 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jabarajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Jagadeesan For R1 C O M M O N O R D E R 1.This memorandum of civil revision in CRP(NPD)No.854 of 2006 is directed against the fair and decret...
Kotteswari Vs. Murugesa Chettiar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.10 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 Kotteswari 1.Sheela 2.Shanthi 3.Ammu 4.Appunu .. Appellants -Vs- 1.Murugesa Chettiar 2.M.Sarvanakumar .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C to set aside the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 in A.S.No.23 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Vellore confirming the judgment and decree dated 04.08.2010 in O.S.No.1367 of 204 on the file of the District Munsif, Vellore. For appellant : Mrs.AL.Ganthimathi ----- JUDGMENT The plaintiffs, who failed to get a decree as prayed for in their suit and also failed in their attempt to challenge the dismissal of the suit before the lower appellate Court, have come forward with the present second appeal against the concurrent judgments of both the courts below non-suiting the appellants/plaintiffs for the reliefs sought for in their suit.2. The suit was filed after gettin...
Akshaya Creations Vs. V.Muthulakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 02.2013 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan C.R.P(PD)Nos.3943 and 3944 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 o1. M/s.Akshaya Creations, rep., by its Producer, A.M.R.Ramesh. 2.A.M.R.Ramesh, Director. ..Revision Petitioners 1 and 2 in both C.R.Ps Vs. 1.V.Muthulakshmi, w/o Late M.Veerappan.2. Gemini Industries & Imaging Pvt. Ltd., rep., by its Managing Director. ... Respondents 1 and 2 in both C.R.Ps C.R.P.(PD)No.3943 of 2012:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment, dated 26.09.2012, passed in C.M.A.No.61 of 2012, on the file of the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in reversing the order and decree, dated 21.07.2012, passed in I.A.No.21050 of 2011, in O.S.No.9415 of 2011, on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. C.R.P.(PD)No.3944 of 2012:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgme...
Anamalai Ambedhkar Thottamakkal Sangam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.2691 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 Anamalai Ambedhkar Thotta Makkal Sangam Regd.847/CBE/1993 Rep.by its General Secretary S.Kesava Marugan 35, New Market, Valparai Coimbator127. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary Labour and Employment Department Chennai -9 2. The Commissioner of Labour D.M.S.Complex Teynampet, Chennai 6 .. Respondents Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records in G.O(2D) No.25 dated 10.10.2012 pursuant to the orders of the 1st respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to refix the minimum wages by increasing the basic wages at the rate of 29% as on 10.10.2012 i.e.Rs.154.90 and fix uniform work loan and incentive pattern norms for Tea Plantation. For Petitioner :: Mr.G.B.Saravanabhavan For Respondents :: M...
State, Rep by Vs. 1.Dr.Y.Ajith
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.594 of 2005 AND CRL.RC[MD].No.439 of 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.594 of 2005:- State, Rep by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Crime No.274 of 2000. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Dr.Y.Ajith 2.Dr.Y.Ashok ... Respondents PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in S.C.No.35 of 2003, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, dated 16.08.2003 and set aside the same. !For Appellant ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor ^For Respondent ... Mr.S.Ashokkumar Senior Counsel For Mr.P.Elil Nilavan CRL.RC[MD].No.439 of 2006:- M.Balakumar : Appellant Vs. 1.State, Rep by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Crime No.274 of 2000. 2.Dr.Y.Ajith 3.Dr.Y.Ashok : Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 39...
1.Boopathy Vs. State by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.560 o1. Boopathy 2.Maruthu Pandian .. Appellants/Accused 1 & 2 vs. State by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Nanguneri, Cr.No.26 of 2004 of Thirukurungudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District in his S.C.No.81 of 2004 dated 09.10.2007. !For appellants ... Mr.K.Prabhu ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellants are the accused in S.C.No.81 of 2004 on the file of the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. Altogether, there were four accused. The other two accused by name Sekar and Kum...
Hi Tech Fly Ash India Enterprises Pvt. Limited Vs. Chairman of Tamil N ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:1.2.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition Nos. 22765 and 23779 of 2009, 5513 to 5515, 5823 and 5824 of 2011 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 in W.P.Nos.22765 and 23779 of 2009; M.P.Nos.4, 5 of 2011 in W.P.Nos.5513 and 5514 of 2011; M.P.No.1 of 2012 in W.P.Nos.5514 and 5515 of 2011 M.P.Nos.3 and 4 of 2011 in W.P.No.5515 of 2011; M.P.No.1 of 2011 in W.P.Nos.5823 and 5824 of 2011; W.P.Nos.22765 and 23779 of 2009:- ------------------------------- M/s.Hi-Tech Fly Ash (India) Enterprises (P) Limited, represented by its Vice President, G.Sunder Raju, No.2/101-5, Tiruchendur Road, Muthiahpuram, Tuticorin-628 005. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Chief Engineer (Civil Designs), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 3rd Floor, NPKRR Maaligai, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Chief Engineer, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Tuticorin-4. .. Respondents W.P.Nos.5513 of 2011:- --...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »