Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Unimed Technologies Ltd. Vs. Eyekare Kilitch Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :15. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal Nos.54 & 55 o1. Unimed Technologies Ltd., Part A, Dadha Nagar, Near Kowl Bazar, Pozhichalur, Pallavaram, Chennai-600 074. rep. by its Constituted Attorney Mr.Srikant Nahata 2.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited., CD Plot No.3, Door No.8, Old Tower Block Street, Nandhanam Extension, Chennai-600 035. rep. by its Constituted Attorney Mr.K.Murugesan .. Appellants in both appeals -vs- 1.M/s Eyekare Kilitch Ltd., No.37, Ujahar Industrial Estate, W.T.Patil Marg, Deonar, Mumbai-400 088. 2.M/s Kilitch Drugs (India) Ltd., Khasa Nos.5/1, 5/2, 5/3, Village-Nihalgarh, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distrrict- Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh-173 025. .. Respondents in both appeals Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the common order dated 06.07.2012 made ...
K.Rangasamy Vs. Registrar of State Human Rights Commission
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.23005 of 2007 K.Rangasamy .. Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Registrar State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu Thiruvarangam Maligai No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai Greenways Road Chenna028. 2. Mrs.G.Priya Malini Sub Inspector of Police City Crime Branch (CCB) Coimbatore City .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order passed in S.H.R.C.No.5610 of 2005 dated 30.05.2006 on the file of the Hon'ble State Human Rights Commission and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pothiraj For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Murthi for R1 Mr.Raja Senthoorpandian for R2 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of the State Human Rights Commission dated 3...
Chairman and Managing Director of Statesman House Vs. R.Vasantha Raj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :15. - 02 - 2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.P. No. 2485 o1. The Chairman and Managing Director Statesman House B-Wing, 9th Floor, Barakhamba Road New Delhi 2. The Director (HRD) (Review Authority) BSNL Corporate Office Statesman House B-Wing, 9th Floor, Barakhamba Road New Delhi 3. The Divisional Engineer (TP) Office of the Deputy General Manager (Planning), BSNL 11 Egmore High Road Chennai .. Petitioners vs.1. R. Vasantha Raj 2. The Registrar Central Administrative Tribunal Chennai .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in T.A. No. 33 of 2009 dated 29.3.2010 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr. M. Govindaraj For R 1 : Ms. P. Stella Mary for M/s K. Moorthy ORDER (Made by M. VENUGOPAL, J.) The First Respondent / Applicant as petitioner preferred W...
Thirugnanasambandam Vs. Kandavel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :15. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD).No.2306 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Thirugnanasambandam ... Petitioner Vs. Kandavel ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 07.04.2011 in I.A.No.31 of 2011 in O.S.No.188 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondent : No appearance O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order made in I.A.No.31 of 2011 in O.S.No.188 of 2008 dated 07.04.2011 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai, whereby, the application filed by the respondent herein under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code to scrap the evidence of P.W.2 was allowed. Though notice was served on the respondent in this Civil Revision Petition, he has not chosen to appear either in person or th...
Kanchi Nagar Kudiyiruppor Vs. M.Raja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. 02.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU CRP(PD) No.3582 of 2009 And M.P.No.1 o1. Kanchi Nagar Kudiyiruppor Urimaiyalargal Nala Sangam A Regd Society represented by its President. 2.S.Venkatachalam ... Petitioners vs. 1.M.Raja 2.V.Sidhan 3.The Commissioner Salem Corporation Sale201. 4.The District Country & Town Planning Officer Salem Corporation Salem. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 02.07.2009 in I.A.No.1423 of 2008 in O.S.No.712 of 2006, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif of Salem. For petitioners : M/s.D.Shivakumaran For respondents : M/s.K.Sridhar for R3 and R4 R1 - No Appearance R2 Given up ORDER This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 02.07.2009 in I.A.No.1423 of 2008 in O.S.No.712 of 2006, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif of Salem, whereby, the application filed ...
K.Sai Jaganathan Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer at Chengelput
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 15 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. TAMILVANAN W.P. No.11255 o1. K.Sai Jaganathan 2. K.R.Krishnan 3. P.Hemamalani 4. M.Jayaraman 5. M/s.Good Neighbours (P) Ltd., rep. by its Director Mr.E.Sachukumar 6. G.Balakrishnan 7. K.Baskaran 8. Radha 9. V.R.Usha 10.A.V.Anand .. Petitioners -vs- 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengelput, Chengelput District 2. The Tahsildar, Tambaram, Chengulput District 3. R.Parthasarathy 4. L.Indirani 5. R.Dhanalakshmi 6. R.Gunasekaran 7. R.Usha Rani 8. R.Rukkumani .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.4081/2002/D dated 07.06.2002 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore Patta No.32 in the petitioners names. For Petitioners : Mr.Gowrishankar For Respondents : Mr. A.Navaneethan, AGP for R1 & R2 Mr. P.Subba Re...
Engineerinchief Wro Vs. C.L.Pasupathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :15. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.No.956 of 2011 M.P.No.1 o1. The Engineer-in-Chief, W.R.O., and The Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chenna005. 2. The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chenna009. ... Appellants Versus C.L.Pasupathy ... Respondent Prayer: This writ appeal is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in W.P.No.3002 of 2007 dated 29.8.2008. For Appellants : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.G.Elancheziyan N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge made in W.P.No.3002 of 2007 dated 29.8.2008 giving directions to the appellants herein to promote the respondent herein as Assistant from 1981 and consequently...
M.A.Saravanan Vs. Kannan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :15. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD).No.878 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 o1. M.A.Saravanan 2.Senthilkumar 3.Mrs.Rathinammal 4.C.Sivalingam 5.Arasammal 6.Govindaraj 7.Subramani 8.Muthumanickam 9.Marimmal ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Kannan 2.Valli 3.Kunjayammal 4.Sakthivel 5.Jayanthi 6.Rani 7.Santhi 8.Settu @ Murugesan 9.Loganathan 10.Saroja 11.Manga 12.Vimala 13.Baby 14.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep by District Collector, Salem. 15.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Dam-1. 16.The Tahsildar, Mettur Dam-1. 17.The Village Administrative Officer, Mecheri. ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 22.09.2010 in I.A.No.271 of 2009 in O.S.No.30 of 2008 on the file of Learned Subordinate Judge, Mettur. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Sekar For Respondents : M/s.A.Sundaravadanam O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed against ...
C.Sekar Vs. Ragini
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15.02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.127 o1. C.Sekar 2.Rajammal ... Appellants vs. Ragini ... Respondent This second appeal is filed against the judgement and decree dated 27.10.2004 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chingleput in A.S.No.10 of 2004 in reversing the judgment and decree dated 22.12.2003 passed by the learned District Munsif, Chingleput in O.S.No.440 of 1995. For Appellants : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.V.Nicholas JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the defendants, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 27.10.2004 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chingleput in A.S.No.10 of 2004 in reversing the judgment and decree dated 22.12.2003 passed by the learned District Munsif, Chingleput in O.S.No.440 of 1995.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.3...
N.Sridhar Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition Excise
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :15. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.1737 of 2013 N.Sridhar ... Petitioner vs.1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai 5.2. The Deputy Commissioner of Excise (Incharge) Chennai 1.3. The Taluk Excise Officer, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai 31.4. Haddows Club, rep. by its Secretary, No.6, Kush Kumar Road, Nungambakkam, Chenna034. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent it its proceedings bearing Letter not L5/1491/2013, dated 21.01.2013 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.P.T. Asha for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Rajeswaran, Special Govt. Pleader For R4 Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for M/s.Anand, Abdul & Vinodh O R D E R Heard Ms.P.T.Asha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government ...