Skip to content

Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 13 2013

S.Karpagam Vs. Suganthi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:13. 02.2013 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.(PD)No.938 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 S.Karpagam .. Petitioner .vs. 1.Suganthi 2.R.Kanagaraj 3.K.Deepak 4.K.Krishnamoorthy .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 22.03.2010 in I.A.No.1928 of 2009 in I.A.No.1514 of 2006 in O.S.No.351 of 2005 on the file of District Munsif, Pollachi. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan For respondents : Mr.T.Murugamanickam for R1 to R3 R4-Served No appearance O R D E R The Revision Petitioner/plaintiff has preferred the instant civil revision petition as against the order dated 22.03.2010 in I.A.No.1928 of 2009 in I.A.No.1514 of 2006 in O.S.No.351 of 2005 passed by the District Munsif, Pollachi.2. The Learned District Munsif, Pollachi, while passing orders in I.A.No.1928 of 2009, on 22.03.2010, among other things observed that "......Admitte...


Feb 13 2013

Lakshmi School Veerappanchan Vs. the State of Tamilnadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 02/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU MP.3 of 2012 in WP.19744 of 2011 LAKSHMI SCHOOL VEERAPPANCHAN VS. THE STATE OF TAMILNADU FOR PETITIONER : T.K.BHASKAR FOR RESPONDENT : ANAND KUMAR ORDER: R.BANUMATHI,J and K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J (Order of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J) This application is filed by the Petitioner Lakshmi school seeking modification/clarification of the order dated 21.09.2012 in W.P.No.19744 of 2011.2. As per the order of the High Court dated 05.10.2010 in W.A.No.2035 of 2010, the Committee gave personal hearing to the Petitioner and passed the order on 03.06.2011, fixing the fee structure for three academic years viz., 2010-11; 2011-12 and 2012-13. Petitioner school is affiliated to Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (ICSE). W.P.No.19744 of 2011 was filed by the Petitioner seeking Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order of the Committee dated 0...


Feb 13 2013

Rani Food Products Vs. Stine Food Products

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 02/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA O.A.Nos.426 and 427 of 2011 in C.S.No.330 of 2011 RANI FOOD PRODUCTS VS STINE FOOD PRODUCTS FOR PETITIONER : K.Rajasekaran FOR RESPONDENT : G.Ramji ORDER: VINOD K. SHARMA,J., O.A.No.426 of 2011: This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed for grant of interim injunction, restraining the respondent / defendant by themselves or their men, servants, agents, franchisees, successors in interest, licensees, assignees, representatives or any of them from in any manner infringing the applicants registered trademark RANI by use of the Trademark RANI or any mark deceptively similar to the applicants registered trademarks or by use of identical or deceptively similar trading style or in any other manner whatsoever, pending disposal of the suit. O.A.No.427 of 2011: This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O...


Feb 13 2013

P.Santhi Vs. Commissioner of Tiruppur Corporation

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P. Nos. 33748, 34410 to 34415, 34956 to 34962, 35162 to 35169 of 2012 and 3369 o1. P.Santhi 2. A.Krishnaveni 3. P.S.Sasireka 4. N.Vijayalakshmi 5. K.Revathy 6. M.Agilandeswari 7. R.Kamala Nageshwari 8. N.Navamani 9. S.Santha Devi 10.S.Senbagam 11.K.Radhamani 12.S.Kamalam .. Petitioners in W.P.No.33748/2012 S.Gomathy .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34410/2012 R.Chandrika .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34411/2012 L.Maheshwari .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34412/2012 L.Renuka Devi .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34413/2012 S.Lalitha .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34414/2012 S.Pandi Meenakshi .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34415/2012 J.Parvatham .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34956/2012 S.Rajeswari .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34957/2012 S.Kamalam .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34958/2012 S.Subhashini .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34959/2012 J.Balamani .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34960/2012 P.Kala .. Petitioner in W.P.No.34961/2012 M.Yogalakshmi .. Petitioner ...


Feb 13 2013

Chennappan Vs. Vedichi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13.02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.PD.No.914 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 o1. Chennappan 2.Govindaraj 3.Raja 4.Arumugham 5.Rani 6.Jeyalakshmi ... Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants Vs. 1.Vedichi 2.Villai ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decretal order dated 21.01.2011 in I.A.No.1068 of 2010 in O.S.No.366 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri. For Petitioners : Ms.P.T.Asha for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates For 1st Respondent : Mr.P.Mani For 2nd Respondent : No appearance (Served) ORDER The Petitioners/Defendants have preferred the present Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 21.01.2011 in I.A.No.1068 of 2010 in O.S.No.366 of 2007 passed by the Learned District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri. 2.The Learned District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri, while passing the order in I.A.No.1068 of 2010 dated 2...


Feb 13 2013

Chokkanathaswami Venkatesaperumal Devasthanam Vs. Thiagarajan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:13. 02.2013 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.(PD)No.865 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Sri Chokkanathaswami and Venkatesaperumal Devasthanam, C.N.Palayam, Cuddalore by its Managing Trust Balasubramaniam .. Petitioner .vs. 1.Thiagarajan 2.Vasantha 3.S.Venkatraman 4.Durarajan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif of Cuddalore dismissing the I.A.No.1112 of 2010 in O.S.385/2009 dated 20.11.2010. For Petitioner : Mrs.Manjula Baskar For respondents : Mr.S.Vijayakumar O R D E R The Revision Petitioner/plaintiff has focussed the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 20.11.2010 in I.A.No.1112 of 2010 in O.S.No.385 of 2009 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Cuddalore.2. The Learned District Munsif, Cuddalore, while passing the impugned order in I.A.No.1112 of 2010 in O.S.No.385 of 2009,...


Feb 13 2013

Velliayan Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA WRIT PETITION No.4078 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2008 and 1 of 2010 Velliayan .. Petitioner vs 1.Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai 2.The Tahsildar Polur, Tiruvannamalai District 3.The Inspector of Police Kadaladi Police Station Tiruvannamalai District 4.Mani 5.Venkatachalam 6.Sampath 7.Chinnappan 8.Subramani 9.Chinnadurai 10.Thirunavukarasu .. Respondents Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from trespassing and laying pathway in the patta land of the petitioner at Melsiruvallur Village S.No.14/2 0.48 cents. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Margabandhu For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader for RR1 to 3 ORDER Thehe petitioner has invoked the equitable extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the prayer for...


Feb 13 2013

indus Ind Bank Ltd. Vs. Mulchand B.Jain

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 2.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.266 OF 201.M/s. Indus Ind Bank Ltd., formerly known as Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd., rep. by Balavenkata Giri Executive Legal Sudarsan Building No.86, Chamiers Road Chenna018. ... Appellant Vs.1. Mulchand B Jain 2. S.K.Srinivasan 3. Shailesh Arvind Patel ... Respondents Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules against the order and decree dated 23.6.2010 in O.P.No.428 of 2009. For Appellant : Mr.K.Moorthy For Respondent No.1 : Mr.Saikrishnan for Sai, Bharat & Ilan For Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.K.Srinivasan, Arbitrator ****** (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.Sundresh, J.) This appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment rendered in O.P.No.428 of 2009, dated 23.6.2010, by which the learned single Judge by exercising the power under Section 34(2)(iii) of th...


Feb 13 2013

T.K.Venkataraman Vs. Government of Tamilnadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA WRIT PETITION No.4639 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 T.K.Venkataraman Managing Partner Sri Vignesh Granites Thimmapuram Post Krishnagiri Taluk & District .. Petitioner vs 1.Government of Tamilnadu rep. By its Secretary Industries Department Fort St. George, Chenna009. 2.The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri .. Respondents Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in G.O.(D) No.122, Industries (MME2) Department dated 9.10.2007, on the file of the first respondent and quashing the same and directing the first respondent to issue prospecting licence as contemplated under Rules 4, 5 and 8 of the Granite Conservation and Development Rules, 1999, following the petitioner's application dated 18.7.2000, for prospecting licence with respect to an extent of 1.00.0...


Feb 13 2013

Sri Amman Medicals Vs. Erode Municipal Corporation

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-13-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.3310 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Sri Amman Medicales Rep. By Partner S.Karthika No.1, Bus Stand Shopping Complex Sangu Nagar Road, Surampattivalasu Erode-638009. .. Petitioner. Versus The Commissioner Erode Municipal Corporation, Erode-638 001. .. Respondent. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to remove the sale and hand over possession of the premises Shop No.1, Bus Stand Shopping Complex, Sangu Nagar Road, Surampattivalasu, Erode-638 009 to the petitioner herein. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Murugamanickam For Respondent : Mr.M.Raja Mathivanan O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. It is stated that the respondent municipal corporation had constructed a row of shops in the bus stand shopping complex, Surampattivalasu, Ero...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial