Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tamilnadu Primary Agricultural Coop Bank All Employeesunion Vs. Secret ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.35288 of 2012, M.P.No.1 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Tamilnadu State Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank All Employees Union (Reg.No.383/SAT), Represented by its General Secretary, C.Kuppusamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Food and Cooperation Department, Fort St.George, Chenna009. 2.The Chairman, Cooperative Societies State Recruitment Bureaus, O/o.Registrar of Coop. Societies, No.170, N.V.N.Natarajan Maaligai, E.V.R.Periyar Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 10. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to implement the circular issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings not Na.Ka.No.52437/2012 Thu.Vae.Sa-1, dated 03.08.2012 for giving promotions to the Salesman/Attenders to the posts of Assistants in Coop. Societies. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents ...
M.Murugesan Vs. 1.R.Rameswari..
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1486 of 2012 and C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1487 of 2012 and M.P(MD)Nos. 2 and 3 of 2012 in C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1486 of 2012 C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1486 of 2012 M.Murugesan ... Petitioner/1st Respondent/ 1st Defendant Vs 1.R.Rameswari ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Plaintiff 2.M.Amsa ... 2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 21.06.2012 passed in I.A.No.1196 of 2011 in O.S.No.60 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Vijayakumar ^For Respondents ... Mr.M.P.Senthil for R.1 Mr.A.W.D.Thilak for R.2 * * * * * C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1487 of 2012 M.Murugesan ... Petitioner/1st Respondent/ 1st Defendant vs 1.R.Rameswari ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Plaintiff 2.M.Amsa ... 2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 o...
Mariamma Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 01.2013 CORAM The Honourable Mr. Justice M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.26485 of 2011 Mariamma .. Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamilnadu, rep. by the Principal Secretary to Govt., Micro Small and Medium Enterprises [C] Dept., Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Chairman & Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited, Chennai-32. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited, Chennai-32. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in connection with the order passed by him in Na.Ka.No.4468/B2/10, dated 21.6.2011, quash the same and direct the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner with effect from the date of her initial appointment as done in the case of others by GP.MS.No.91, Micro Small and Medium Enterprises...
Shetron Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs(Port-export), Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
This is the second round of litigation before the Tribunal. By Order No.507/2004 dt. 1.3.2004, the Tribunal remanded back the matter to the original authority to re-adjudicate as under :- We have considered the submissions made by both sides. We find that the Circulars issued by the Board are binding on the Departmental authorities. In this case, the circular No.62/99-cus dt. 17.9.99 was issued by the Board clarifying the issue involved in the present appeals. In para 3 of the said circular, it is clarified that revised interest effective from 12.5.99 is applicable in respect of goods warehoused prior to that date, but only from the expiry of six months or 12.5.99 whichever is later. Wherever goods have been allowed to be removed from the warehouse on or after 12.5.99 may be reviewed and decided in the light of these instructions. In view of these clear-cut instructions, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Assistant commissioner of Customs are set aside and matter is remanded b...
V.Arumugam Vs. 1.J.Sathish Kumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1412 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 V.Arumugam .. Petitioner Vs 1.J.Sathish Kumar 2.K.Panchavarnam 3.K.Illango 4.K.Kalaimathi .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order dated 20.6.2012 made ready on 10.7.2012 in I.A.No.840 of 2010 in O.S.No.1133 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai. !For petitioner ... Ms.J.Padhmaavathy Devi ^For respondents... Mr.M.Rajaraman for R1 :ORDER Heard both the sides. The epitome and the long and short of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The learned counsel for the revision petitioner would air the grievance of her client to the effect that the Lower Court passed a cryptic order whereby the revision petitioner was directed to furnish security and the order does not adhere to the ingredien...
The General Manager, Vs. M.E.Kaja Jainullapaudee
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No. 3 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 The General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, Chennai ... Petitioner/Petitioner/1st Respondent Vs. M.E.Kaja Jainullapaudeen ... Respondent/Respondent/ Claimant Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and fair order passed in I.A.No.79 of 2012 dated 29.11.2012 in I.D.No.43 of 2005, on the file of the Labour Court, Tirunelveli. !For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Prabhakaran ^ * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 29.11.2012, passed in I.A.No.79 of 2012 in I.D.No.43 of 2005, by the Labour Court, Tirunelveli.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner.3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client - the General Manager, State Express Transport Corpor...
Chithirakannan Vs. 1. the District Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1438 of 2012 Chithirakannan .. Petitioner vs.1. The District Superintendent of Police, Trichy & District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District. 3.Kumaresan 4.Dheenadayalan 5.Nandakumar 6.Saraswathay .. Respondents (R1 given up) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's wife Revathi, aged 34, the petitioner's minor daughter madhumitha aged 8, now residing at Vadakkulakshmipuram, Mnapparai, Trichy District before this Court and set them at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.N.Balakrishnan ^For respondents... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Addl.Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying th...
K.Raja UssaIn Vs. 1.S.Jothi Bai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2456 of 2010 K.Raja Ussain ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. 1.S.Jothi Bai 2.S.Ravichandran 3.S.Balasubramani 4.S.Sankar 5.S.Mala ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants Prayer Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 18.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.495 of 2010 in O.S.No.67 of 2006 by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Muthalraj ^For Respondents... Mr.K.Sekar * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is focussed to get set aside the order dated 18.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.495 of 2010 in O.S.No.67 of 2006 by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.2. Heard both sides.3. The indubitable and indisputable facts leading to the filing of this Civil Revision Petition, would run thus: (i) The revision petitioner herein filed the suit for specific performa...
1. Minor.Sivasankar Vs. 1. Lakshmaniam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1275 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos. 1 of 2011 and 1 to 3 o1. Minor.Sivasankar 2. Minor.Iswarya .. Petitioners/Petitioners/ Plaintiffs vs 1. Lakshmaniam 2. Shanmuganatham 3. Tmt.Muthulakshmi 4. Jeyalakshmi 5. Subbulakshmi 6. Karthikeyan 7. Vijayakumar 8. Selvam 9. Ponraj .. Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.484 of 2010 in O.S.No.49 of 2010, dated 12.04.2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Ambasamudram. !For Petitioners... No Appearance ^For Respondents... No Appearance *** :ORDER When this Civil Revision Petition was listed on 02.01.2013 there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner and hence this Civil Revision petition was directed to be listed under the caption, "for dismissal" on 03.01.2013. Today also when the m...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.S.Muthammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1305 of 2006 The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Balamore Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. .. Appellant vs 1.S.Muthammal 2.A.Christopher 3.D.Vijayakumari .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the order and decree dated 25.10.2005, made in M.C.O.P.No.124 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Srinivasan ^For Respondent ... M/s.A.Eliselitsa Devi for R1 :JUDGMENT The appellant/3rd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD).No.1305 of 2006, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.124 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.2. The petitioner, has filed the claim in M.C.O.P.No.124 of 2002, claiming compensa...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »