Chithirakannan Vs. 1. the District Superintendent of Police,

Chithirakannan vs 1. the District Superintendent of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 03, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/965443

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/965443
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren
Decided On: Jan 03, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chithirakannan

Respondent

1. the District Superintendent of Police,

Excerpt

.....of india to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's wife revathi, aged 34, the petitioner's minor daughter madhumitha aged 8, now residing at vadakkulakshmipuram, mnapparai, trichy district before this court and set them at liberty. !for petitioner ... mr.n.balakrishnan ^for respondents... mr.r.ramachandran, addl.public prosecutor :order (order of the court was made by m.jaichandren, j) this habeas corpus petition has been filed praying that this court may be pleased to produce the detenue, namely, revathi, aged about 34 years, as well as her minor daughter, namely, madhumitha, aged about 8 years, before this court and to set them at liberty.2. today, when the matter was listed for hearing, the second respondent police has produced the detenue and her daughter, before this court. on enquiry, the detenue, the wife of the petitioner, had stated that she is living with her mother, namely, saraswathy, the sixth respondent herein, along with her daughter, at manapparai. she had further stated that the petitioner had filed hmop no.234 of 2011, before the subordinate judge, pudukottai, for restitution of conjugal rights and the matter is pending adjudication.3. in such circumstances, this court is of the view that the present habeas corpus petition is devoid of merits and therefore, it is liable to be dismissed. hence, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed. however, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to pursue the hmop no.234 of 2011, before the sub court, pudukottai, in accordance with law. jikr to 1. the district superintendent of police, trichy & district. 2.the inspector of police, manapparai police station, trichy district. 3.the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of the madras high court, madurai.

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:

03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1438 of 2012 Chithirakannan .. Petitioner vs.

1. The District Superintendent of Police, Trichy & District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District. 3.Kumaresan 4.Dheenadayalan 5.Nandakumar 6.Saraswathay .. Respondents (R1 given up) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's wife Revathi, aged 34, the petitioner's minor daughter madhumitha aged 8, now residing at Vadakkulakshmipuram, Mnapparai, Trichy District before this Court and set them at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.N.Balakrishnan ^For respondents... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Addl.Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to produce the detenue, namely, Revathi, aged about 34 years, as well as her minor daughter, namely, Madhumitha, aged about 8 years, before this Court and to set them at liberty.

2. Today, when the matter was listed for hearing, the second respondent police has produced the detenue and her daughter, before this Court. On enquiry, the detenue, the wife of the petitioner, had stated that she is living with her mother, namely, Saraswathy, the sixth respondent herein, along with her daughter, at Manapparai. She had further stated that the petitioner had filed HMOP NO.234 of 2011, before the Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai, for restitution of conjugal rights and the matter is pending adjudication.

3. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the present Habeas Corpus Petition is devoid of merits and therefore, it is liable to be dismissed. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to pursue the HMOP No.234 of 2011, before the Sub Court, Pudukottai, in accordance with law. jikr To 1. The District Superintendent of Police, Trichy & District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2013 Same Parties Chithirakannan vs 1. the District Superintendent of Police, Same Subject Education Same Judge M.Jaichandren