Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Vijayakumari Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P (MD) No.1466 of 2012 K.Vijayakumari .. Petitioner vs 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Prohibition and Excise Department, Omanthoorar Government Estate, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Thiruchirappalli City, Thiruchirappalli. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the Detention Order passed by the second respondent pertaining to the order made in C.P.O/T.C./I.S./D.O.No.49/2012 dated 17.07.2012 setting aside the said order of detention passed by the second respondent and setting the detenu, Mani @ Manikandan, S/o.Karnan, aged 25 years, at liberty now detained in Central Prison, Trichy. !For petitioner ... Ms.N.Juliet Latha ^For respondents ... Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl.Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was...
Ravichandran Vs. the District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.815 of 2013 Ravichandran ... Petitioner Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent not to open the TASMAC Shop, near Bus Stop at Eripurakarai Village, E.C.R.Highway from Athiramapattinam to Rajamadam on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2012. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Deenadhayalan ^For respondent ... Mr.T.S.Mohamad Mohideen Addl.Government Pleader :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) Mr.T.S.Mohamad Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the respondent...
R.Vimala Vs. Directorate of Collegiate Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.24742 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 o1. R.Vimala 2.G.Rameshkannan 3.Dr.R.Murugan 4.C.Sundaramoorthy 5.Dr.D.Sheela 6.Dr.P.Annadurai 7.K.Bhuvaneswari 8.R.Vimala Devi 9.M.Sivasankari .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Directorate of Collegiate Education, Department of Higher Education, 9th Floor, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.Pachaiyappa's Trust Board, rep by its Secretary / President, Poonamallee High Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai-600 030. .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to initiate the recruitment process for filling up the posts of Assistant Professors / Director of Physical Education / Librarian sanctioned by the 1st respondent and notified by the second respondent as per the details of vacancies, department wise, set out in the prospectus iss...
Sri Lakshmi Ram Auto Spares Vs. Commercial Tax Officer of Chithode Ass ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. 1.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.No.984 of 2013 M/s.Sri Lakshmi Ram Auto Spares, represented by its Proprietor R.Ramasamy, No.5/489, SKM Complex, Kalingarayanpalayam, Erode. ... Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Chithode Assessment Circle, Erode. ... Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 by disposing of the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 dated 30.11.2012 as expeditiously as possible. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, Government Advocate(Tax). ----- O R D E R This writ petition has been filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 by disposing of the petition filed...
Malayalam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.693 of 2013 Malayalam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur Range, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 5.Samiyadi ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to prevent 5th respondent from staging drama on 19.01.2013 in Sunnambur Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District by considering representation dated 6.1.2013. !For Petitioner ... Mr.T.A.Ebenezer ^For respondents 1 to 4 ... Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan Addl.Govt.Pleader :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) Today, when this Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitio...
The Proprietor, Sri Divya Agro Centre and Another Vs. B. Vinayagam
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the opposite parties against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chengalpattu in C.C.56/2004, dated 29-04-2010, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that, he purchased hybrid variety Water Melon Seeds from the 1st opposite party, which is produced and marketed by the 2nd opposite party, and sowed the seeds in his 4 acres land with natural manure following the instructions given by the 1st opposite party believing the seeds to be Bejo variety. When the plants grew up giving yield, it was found that the plants were of mixed / multi variety and the yield was very low viz. two to 3 tons which also was not in good condition. He had incurred expenses to the tune of Rs.70,000/- and he was put to loss to the tune of Rs.1 Lac apart from the expenditure; and both the opposite parties are liable to pay Rs.2 Lac for their unfair trade practice, for the financial loss and for mental agony. He issued a ...
The Proprietor, Sri Divya Agro Centre and Another Vs. Kuppusamy
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the opposite parties against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chengalpattu in C.C.57/2004, dated 04-05-2010, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that, he purchased hybrid variety Water Melon Seeds from the 1st opposite party, which is produced and marketed by the 2nd opposite party, and sowed the seeds in his 5.03 acres land with natural manure following the instructions given by the 1st opposite party believing the seeds to be Bejo variety. When the plants grew up giving yield, it was found that the plants were of mixed / multi variety and the yield was very low viz. two to 3 tons which also was not in good condition. He had incurred expenses to the tune of Rs.75,000/- and he was put to heavy loss; and both the opposite parties are liable to pay Rs.2 Lac for their unfair trade practice and for the financial loss; and Rs.50,000/- for physical strain and Rs.50,000/- for mental agony. He...
The Chairman, Maruthi Suzuki India Limited Vs. S. Ahimsairaj and Anoth ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-11-2013
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the 2nd opposite party against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North] in C.C.155/2010, dated 10-11-2011, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that, he purchased a new SWIFT Diesel VDI Model car bearing registration No. TN-18 A-5424 on 25-9-2009 for a sum of Rs.5,69,723/- which includes Road Tax, Insurance and cost of accessories. The first service was done on 28-10-2009 on completion of 911 KMs and 2nd service was done on 31-12-2009 at 5526 KMs. On 8-4-2010 during routine check-up he found no oil trace in the dip stick and he left the car with the 1st opposite party for necessary check-up and service and the car was returned to him on 16-4-2010 by the opposite party informing him that the engine was found having 1.7 litre of engine oil and that there was leak in the turbo charger and lubricating line due to which oil was running continuously and hence oil level has been steadi...
A.Moorthy Vs. Indian Overseas Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10.01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRP.(NPD).No.2266 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.26403 of 2005 A.Moorthy .. Petitioner Vs. Indian Overseas Bank rep.by its Branch Manager Pappireddipathy Dharmapuri District .. Respondent Prayer : This civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the fair and decretal Order dated 09.09.2005 and made in E.P.No.46 of 2005 in O.S.No.30 of 1990, on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Harur. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Murugamanickam For Respondent : Mr.F.B.Benjamin George O R D E R This memorandum of civil revision is directed against the fair and decretal Order dated 09.09.2005 and made in E.P.No.46 of 2005 in O.S.No.30 of 1990, on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Harur.2. It is manifested from the records that the respondent Bank had filed the suit in O.S.No.30 of 1990 against the revision petitioner for recovery of a sum of Rs.46,13...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Vs. Radhakrishnan(Died)1. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1728 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2012 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., through it Branch Manager, Madurai. .. Petitioner/Respondent/ Respondent Vs Radhakrishnan(died) 1. Indira ... Respondent/Petitioner/ Petitioner 2. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Karaikudi. ... Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 09.02.2012 passed by the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram in E.P.No.23 of 2011 in M.C.O.P.No.67 of 2002. !For Petitioner ... Mr.K.Gokul ^For Respondents ... Mr.V.Sitharanjandas for R.1 ... Mr.Sathiyasingh for R.2 * * * * * :ORDER The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 09.02.2012 passed in E.P.No.23 of 2011 in M.C.O.P.No.67 of 2002, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.2. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »