Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Valarmathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Civil miscellaneous appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award and decree dated 29.4.2003 made in MCOP No.446/2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court), Tindivanam.JUDGMENT1. The appellant Insurance Company has filed this appeal challenging the quantum of compensation alone awarded in MCOP No.446/2002 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court), Tindivanam, dated 29.4.2003.2. The respondents 1 to 3 who are claimants in the above said O.P., have filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.10 lakhs for the death of one Dheenadhayalan in the motor accident that occurred on 4.3.2002. The case of the claimants is that on 4.3.2002, the deceased went to Villupuram Alagappa Temple by walk and on the same direction, the Car bearing Registration No.TN 32/Y 0477 was driven by its driver in high speed and dashed against the deceased and he sustained injuries and died in the Government Hospital...
T.Chandravadhana Vs. K.Srinivasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in application No.1841 of 2012 in O.P.No.388/2011, dated 26.04.2012 pending on the file of this court and quash the same and to direct the Registry of this Court to return the O.P.No.388/2011 to the respondent to present it before the proper court andORDER1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to call for the records in application No.1841 of 2012 in O.P.No.388 of 2011, dated 26.4.2012 pending on the file of the Original Side of this court and after setting aside the same, seeks for the return of O.P.No.388 of 2011 to the respondent so as to present it before the appropriate court.2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The respondent filed O.P.No.388 of 2011 before this court under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act read with Order 21 Rule 13 of the O.S. Rules. The respond...
B.Suseela Vs. S.Govind
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Revision preferred under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the Judgment of Conviction and Sentence, dated 26.06.2009 made in C.A.No.7 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, confirming the Judgment of Conviction and Sentence, dated 25.02.2008 imposed in C.C.No.314 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam.ORDER1. This criminal revision has been preferred against the Judgment, dated 26.06.2009 made in C.A.No.7 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, confirming the sentence of 3 months RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default sentence of one month SI imposed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, by Judgment, dated 25.02.2008 in C.C.No.314 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam.2. It is seen that the case was taken on file on the complaint given by the respondent herein under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments A...
N.Sundar Vs. the Inspector General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Ref.No.Tha.Pa.No.115/2011 (j/g/vz;/115/2011) dated 03.10.2011 relating to the Charge Memo on the file of the respondent herein and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to revoke the suspension and reinstate the petitioner in his regular post as Police Constable in the Office of the respondent with all perquisites.ORDER1. Aggrieved by the Charge Memo issued by the respondent in proceedings vide Tha.Pa.No.115/2011 dated 03.10.2011, the petitioner is before this Court praying to quash the same and for a consequential direction to the respondent to revoke the suspension and reinstate him in his regular post as Police Constable with all perquisites.2. Facts of the case as put forth in the affidavit would run thus :2.1. The petitioner is working as PC 733 of Armed Reserve, Madurai City. H...
Ms Jai Renga Mills Private Ltd. Vs. the Authorized Officer.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
PrayerPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Order/Action of the 1st respondent dated 21.04.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Rehabilitation Proposal of the Petitioner and pass such further or other ordersW.P.(MD).No.31 of 2011PrayerPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to upgrade the account of M/s.Jai Renga Mills P Ltd maintained with the 2nd respondent branch from Non Performing Asset Account and re-classify the same as a Standard Account as per the guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India.W.P.(MD).No.32 of 2011PrayerPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the letter dated 15.04.2010 issued by the respondents and quash the same and consequently directing...
T.Xavier Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Letter No.29369/H1/2010-9 dated 19.10.2011 issued by the 1st respondent State Government and the consequent Notification No.3/2011 dated 11.11.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent State Consumer Commission, quash the same and further direct the respondents herein to appoint forthwith the petitioner as the President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in any of the existing vacancies as per the recommendation of the High Level Selection Committee dated 12.05.2011.ORDER1. Seeking to quash the impugned Letter No.29369/H1/2010-9 dated 19.10.2011 issued by the 1st respondent State Government and the consequent Notification No.3/2011 dated 11.11.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent State Consumer Commission and for a further direction to the respondents to appoint him as the President of the District Consumer...
The Management Vs. the Appellate Authority Under the Tamilnadu Shops a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
PRAYERWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent, in his life T.N.S.E.No.6/04 and quash the order dated 25.01.2006.ORDER1. The petitioner is a Co-operative Bank. The second respondent was employed as a Senior Clerk/Secretary incharge in the petitioner bank. The Cashier one Mr.Radhakrishnan, misappropriated the funds to the tune of Rs.2,16,500/- from various accounts. The petitioner issued a charge memo dated 23.09.2002 against the second respondent alleging that he connived with the Cashier Mr.Radhakrishnan in misappropriating the funds. The following charges are levelled against him in the charge memo dated 23.09.2002. 1.Connived with Mr.S. Radhakrishnan- Cashier of the bank by allowing him withdrawals from the accounts of M/s.Shanmugalakshmi, A.Sankari, A.V.Palanichamy, R.Seeniappan and S.Karuppasamypandian by manipulating false records and fo...
M.Shenbagalakshmi Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order of refund of EMD amount dated 5.5.2011 and consequential relief of mandamus, directing the second respondent to declare the petitioner as successful purchaser and thereby to execute the sale deed on receipt of the bid amount.VINOD K.SHARMA, J.O R D E R1. The petitioner has invoked the discretionary equitable jurisdiction of this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order of refund of EMD amount dated 5.5.2011 by cancelling the bid of the petitioner for purchase of flat.2 Though the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of M/s. Ircon International Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, but for the reason best known, the petitioner has impleaded only the Joint General Manager, as a party to this writ petition and has not imp...
The Commissioner of Income tax. Vs. the Metal Powder Company Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Tax Case Appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Chennai, dated 9.3.2005 passed in I.T.A.Nos.1529 and 1621/ Mds/1997 for assessment year 1994-95.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J)1. The Revenue has preferred the appeals as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to assessment year 1994-95. The above Tax Case (Appeals) was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-"(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that conversion charges and sundry sales does not form part of the turnover, for the purpose of calculation of deduction under Section 80HHC?(ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing a deduction of the amounts spent on replacement of independent machinery as revenue expenditure?(iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the profit marg...
T.Durai Raju. Vs. the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in connection with the impugned show cause notice passed by him in R.C.No.11009/K4/2002 dated 04.04.2002 and quash the same.O R D E R1. The petitioner entered the service as Grade-II Police Constable at Thanjavur District on 05.10.1970. The petitioner was promoted as Head Constable in the year 1996. The petitioner was prosecuted on the complaint of Thiru Swamynathan for illegal gratification.2. The petitioner was charged under Section 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and was placed under suspension during trial.3. On conviction, the petitioner was issued show cause notice, calling to show cause as to why his services be not dispensed with. Instead of replying to the show cause notice, the petitioner approached this Court to challenge the show cause notice.4. The show cause notice has been issue...