Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kathirvel. Vs. Nachimuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the order dated 3.2.2010 passed by the District Munsif Court, Kangayam in E.P.No.70 of 2008 in O.S.No.126 of 2005.ORDER1. Inveighing the order dated 3.2.2010 passed by the District Munsif Court, Kangayam in E.P.No.70 of 2008 in O.S.No.126 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focused.2. Despite printing the name of the respondent, there is no appearance. 3. The germane facts as stood uncurtained in this matter could be encapsulated thus:(i) The revision petitioner filed the E.P. as decree holder for recovery of money under the money decree, which he obtained. (ii) The respondent herein/judgement debtor entered appearance and contested the E.P.on the ground that during the pendency of the suit itself, attachment before judgement was effected relating to his property and without proceeding as against the saud property for sale for recovering the decreetal amount, the revision petitioner/decree holder had chosen to seek fo...
Joseph Samuel. Vs. the Zonal Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to officiate as Zonal 7 Chairman of Zonal 7 Committee.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to officiate as Zonal 7 Chairman of Zonal 7 Committee.2. Heard Dr.G.Krishnamurthy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Navaneethakrishnan, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. The relief sought for by the petitioner appears to be totally confusing and without any purpose. However, petitioner has set out his grievance in his representation dated 11.4.2012. If such representation has been received by the second respondent, the authority is directed to consider the same in accordance with law. If the representat...
T. Kothandam. Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revise the seniority of the petitioner and restore his name in the C list of Superintendent for the year 1993-94 published by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.41958/NGB II/1/93 dated 5.8.93 and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits at par with his juniors.ORDER1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the seniority of the petitioner and restore his name in the C list of Superintendent for the year 1993-94 published by the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No.41958/NGB II/1/93 dated 5.8.93 and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits at par with his juniors.2. The petitioner joined the service as Junior Assistant on 3.9.73 in Vellore District. He was promoted as Assistant on 3.12.80 in the same district, and was due for promotion as Superintendent i...
i.Jacintha Rani. Vs. the Chief Educational Officer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
PRAYER IN W.P.No.4982 of 2007:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.8058 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the first respondent to appoint the petitioner as Physical Education Teacher with reference to her seniority in Employment Exchange registration and with reference to the qualifications prescribed for the said post under the Special Rules for the Tamil Nadu Elementary Educational Subordinate Service.PRAYER IN W.P.No.4990 of 2007:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.8059 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment as B.T. Assistant (Maths) without reference to the date of registration of her B.Ed. Qualification in the Employment Exchange and grant her all consequential benefits.COMMON ORDER1. This order shall dispose of...
Indian Airlines Limited. Vs. C.Udayashankar, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent Union from holding demonstrations, meetings or in any manner disrupting, preventing, interfering, inciting, instigating, gathering in the work/operations of the petitioner Airlines, adopting any go slow tactics, slogan shouting, mass absenteeism and or resorting to strike in any manner whatsoever in nature or preventing employees reporting for work, staging dharna etc. inside and outside the premises of the petitioner Airlines located at booking office at 19, Marshalls Road, Regional Office at Airlines House, Meenambakkam, Chennai-27, Offices at the Anna International Airport, Kamaraj Domestic Airport, Meenambakkam, Cargo Complex, Chennai-27 and all the other offices of the Petitioner Airlines located in the Southern Region including the Residence of the officers of the Petitioner Airlines.ORDER1. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner...
C.S.Pitchai Pillai. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the proceedings of the impugned order vide Sae.Mu.No.3370/E2/05 dated 04.04.2006 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to hand over possession of the unit/factory situated at No.48, C.I.Shed, Kamaraj Stree, M.G.R. Nagar, Chennai 600 078 to the petitioner.O R D E R1. The petitioner has projected this Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus praying for an issuance of an order by this Court in calling for the records of the proceedings of the impugned order in Sae.Mu.No.3370/E2/05 dated 04.04.2006 passed by the respondent. Also the petitioner has sought for issuance of a direction to the respondent to hand over possession of the unit/factory situated at No.48, C.I.Shed, Kamaraj Street, M.G.R. Nagar, Chennai 600 078.2. According to the petitioner, he is a lawful allottee of the unit/factory situated at No.48, C.I.S...
K. Nagarajan. Vs. the Government of Tamilnadu, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to ratify the appointment of the petitioners as Deputy Block Development Officer without insisting for service qualification and further direct the respondents to promote the petitioners as Block Development Officer from the date on which their immediate juniors were promoted as Block Development Officers with all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay, refixation of pay, seniority etc.O R D E R1. Learned Additional Government Pleader informs this Court that the petitioners were promoted as Block Development Officers and they joined duty as such on 11.12.2006.2. In view of the fact that the petitioners have sought the relief of promoting them as Block Development Officers, the writ petition has become an infructuous one. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.3. Inasmuc...
M.Balakrishnan Bhatt, and ors. Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Au ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Writ Petition No.14592 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive, consider, process and approve the petitioners' application for demolition and reconstruction by issuing planning permission for construction of residential special building after demolishing the existing building in accordance with law of their property at Block No.36, P.T.Rajan Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078 comprised in S.No.32/1 (Part) Block No.27 of Kodambakkam Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai-78 without insisting on production of No Objection Certificate from the third respondent or any other Authorities concerned and to accord sanction for the same in accordance with law expeditiously.Writ Petition No.14593 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive, consider, process and approve the petitioners' appli...
P.D.Sundaresan. Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 11.12.2009 issued by the first respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.331, MAS Department and quash the same as void, unlawful and unjust.ORDER1. The petitioner claiming to be the President of the Parent Teachers Association of the Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kaveripattinam, has filed the present writ petition, seeking to challenge the G.O.Ms.No.331, School Education Department, dated 11.12.2009. By the impugned Government Order, the State Government had entertained the request of the Thanthai Periyar Installation Committee, i.e., the 7th respondent and had granted permission to install the statue of "Thanthai Periyar" (E.V.Ramasamy) on the south eastern corner of the school premises with an area of 10' X 10'. After erecting the same, they were directed to maintain the statue on their own.2. Before the ...
A. Saravanan. Vs. the Registrar General
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Registrar General to re-value the petitioner's answer book for Law Paper-II for Civil Judges Examination held on 25.3.2012 pursuant to the notification dated 21.1.2012 with registration No.14295 and award appropriate marks and call him for viva-voce and publish his result.O R D E RN. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Registrar General to re-value the petitioner's answer book for Law Paper-II for Civil Judges Examination held on 25.3.2012 pursuant to the notification dated 21.1.2012 with registration No.14295 and award appropriate marks and call him for viva-voce and publish his result.2. Heard Mr.N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.AL.Somayaji, learned Senior Counsel for respondent.3. It is the contention of the petitioner that ...