Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Managing Director Vs. T.K.Subramanian.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
PRAYERAppeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the order dated 29.07.2004 in M.C.O.P.No.577 of 2001 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (I Additional Subordinate Judge), Madurai.R.BANUMATHI,J1. Being aggrieved by the award of compensation of Rs.22,97,500/- for the injuries sustained by the Respondent-Claimant, the Appellant-Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation has preferred this appeal.2. Brief facts are that on 15.8.1997 - 6.30 a.m., the injured Claimant and his friend Venkateswarlu proceeded to Tirumala from Tirupathi from Gummidipoondi, Madras to worship in Sri Venkateswara Temple, in his motor cycle bearing registration No.TSO 1760. At about about 10.00 a.m., when the Claimant was proceeding at IInd Ghat road from west to east, Appellant Corporation bus bearing No.AP-9 Z 7661 was coming behind their vehicle in a hair pin bend and Appellant Corporation bus overtook the motor cycle and while so overtaking, the front bumper of the bus hit again...
J.Shanthi. Vs. the Presiding Officer, and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to ID 154/2006 and quash the award dated 23.12.2008 passed therein by the first respondent and further direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.R.SUDHAKAR, J.ORDER1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to I.D.No.154/2006 and quash the award dated 23.12.2008 passed therein by the first respondent and further direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.2. The petitioner joined the services of the second respondent as jewel appraiser on 20.6.1997 and she was regularized on 27.3.1998. On 9.3.2005, petitioner was suspended from service on accou...
A.TharA. Vs. Jayamurugan Metals.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred as against the order dated 05.08.2011 passed by the learned VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in RCA No.702 of 2006 in RCOP No.465 of 2005.G.RAJASURIA, J.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 05.08.2011 passed by the learned VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in RCA No.702 of 2006 in RCOP No.465 of 2005, this civil revision petition has been focussed.2. Heard both sides.3. Synoptically and succinctly, the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision petition would run thus:(i) Originally, the RCOP for eviction was filed by the deceased landlord and eviction was ordered; as against which, the tenant preferred appeal citing the deceased landlord as respondent. Pending appeal, the landlord died. Whereupon, the learned counsel for the tenant, strictly in accordance with law informed the Rent Controller about the death of the landlord. (ii) However, the learned counsel fo...
K.Palanisamy. Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Salem District, and an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to give permission to conduct the drama program portraying social issues casted by children at Noolathu Kombai, Sri Mariamman Kovil on 04.04.2012 at Thumbalpatti Village, Salem District, based on petitioner representation dated 30.03.2012.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. The petitioner claiming to be Dharmakartha of Mariamman Temple, Noolathu Kombai, Thumbalpatti Village has come forward to file the present writ petition seeking for a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the second respondent viz., the Inspector of Police to give permission to perform a drama portraying social issues casted by children at the village in connection with Mariamman Kovil festival on 04.04.2012 based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2012.2. In the copy of the representation dated 30.03.2012 the petitioner requested the Inspector of Police, Mallur, Salem District that ...
Ajey and Sons Oils (Madras) Private Limited. Vs. the State of Tamil Na ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Tax Case Revisions to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai dated 26.7.1996 in T.A.Nos. 390/94, 389/94 and 391/94 respectively.CHITRA VENKATARAMAN; K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU, JJ.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J)1. The assessee is on revisions as against the order of the Tribunal. The above revisions are admitted on the following common questions of law:-(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the sales affected by the petitioners are local sales?(ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in stating that in the absence of a specific order, there cannot be an inter-State sale as contemplated under Section 3(a) of the Act?(iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in confirming the levy of penalty in a revision of assessment unde...
S. Subramaniyam. Vs. the Director of School Education, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in impugned order dated 5.3.2012 passed in proceedings O.Mu.No.1914/A2/2012 by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal and unlawful and consequently direct the third respondent to re-employ the petitioner till the end of the academic year 2011-2012 (31.5.2012) as B.T. Assistant (Tamil) in Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Kumarapalayam Namakkal.N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.ORDER1. Mr.V.Subbiah, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.2. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 5.3.2012 and consequently direct the third respondent to re-employ the petitioner till the end of the academic year 2011-2012 (31.5.2012) as B.T. Assistant (Tamil) in Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Kumarapalayam Namakkal.3. The petitioner was appointed as B.T.Assistant ...
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Vs. the District Revenue Offi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner herein dated 27.12.2011 requesting the 1st respondent to release the Vehicle Tata 1109 Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-20 BQ 3978 to the petitioner company.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. The petitioner company is the financier financing vehicle. One such vehicle by itself is a Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-20 BQ 3978. The said vehicle was seized by the police in connection with the crime under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act on 3.8.2011. In respect of the release of the same vehicle, the petitioner earlier filed W.P.No.24628 of 2011 as against the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Thiruvannamali and the the owner of the vehicle. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition on 24.11.2011 giving liberty. At that time, the learned Government Advocate submitted that...
Hotel Vasantha Bhavan. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-i, Workme ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records culminating in the order of the second respondent Letter No.G3/39942/07 dated 16.08.2007 and quash the same.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. This writ petition shows yet another instance where authorities who are not legally trained were empowered to decide the rights of parties. Due to wrong procedure adopted by the first respondent, unnecessarily, the 4th respondent was put to hardship. 2. The petitioner who is an employer has filed the writ petition, challenging an order dated 16.08.2007, wherein and by which the second respondent viz., Collector of Chennai had directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1, 82,995/- along with interest at the rate of 12% with effect from 20.10.2003 within 15 days, failing which they were threatened with revenue recovery action.3. The writ petition was admitted on 13.11.2007. Pending the writ petition, this Court granted interim ...
Mr. Clement Carol. Vs. Jayanthi Maria Valentine.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Prayer in CMA No.3507 of 2009:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against the fair and decreetal order made in M.O.P.No.30 of 2008, dated 03.08.2009 by the Family Court, Puducherry.Prayer in Crl.R.C.Nos.1253 of 2009 & 1810 of 2011:- Criminal Revision Cases filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order, dated 03.08.2009, made in M.C.No.38 of 2007 on the file of the Family Court, Puducherry.COMMON JUDGMENTK.Mohan Ram, J.,1. The appellant in the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3507 of 2009 is the husband of the respondent. 2. The appellant initially filed IDOP No.140 of 2006 before the District Court, Cuddalore, against the respondent herein under Section 10 (1) (vii) and (x) and Section 19 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 seeking a decree of nullity of marriage between the parties, dated 22.08.2003, on the ground of impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage and at the time...
Esther Vijaya, and ors. Vs. the Chief Controlling Revenue Authorities ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order of the 2nd respondent in No.6052/APB/Central Chennai dated 9.6.2009 and the order of the 1st respondent in his proceedings in TM No.35722/P1/2009 dated 11.2.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to register the Partition Deed P.22/2009 dated 19.5.2009 under Sec.45 (a) of the Stamp Act.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition challenging an order passed by the Inspector General of Registration and Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, namely the 1st respondent. The said order came to be passed on an appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the 2nd respondent demanding the definite stamp duty in registering the document, which is an instrument of partition In terms of Section 2(15) of the Indian Stamp Act. As to how the stamp duty has to be levied is set out in the Sch...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »