Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Ramesh at Ramesh Babu Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Criminal Appeal preferred against the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant in S.C.No.189 of 2008 dated 15.09.2010 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.IV), Ponneri.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.DEVADASS, J.)1. The appellant is accused in S.C.No.189 of 2008 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.IV), Ponneri. For convenience sake, in this judgment, the appellant will be referred as accused.2. On 15.09.2010, the Trial Court convicted the accused under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced him to life and fined him Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment.3. The prosecution case in brief is as follows:(i)Door No.30, situate in Sivaraj Iind Cross Street, Kannadapalayam, Puzhal belongs to P.W.7 Rajini. In the upstairs, one portion was let out to the accused and the other portion was let out to deceased Karthikeyan. P.W.1 Vijaya is his wife. As between the accused and Karthikeyan, ther...
R.Venkatachalam Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.3.2012 to permit the petitioner's Nadar community peoples alogn with 7th respondent Kongu Vellar community peoples and other communities peoples to participate and perform the festival of Sri Thanga Marriamman Thirukkoyil, Nattuvampalayam, Sangagiri R.S.Sangagiri Taluk, Salem District to be held on 04.04.2012 or any other subsequent dates.O R D E R1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to consider representation dated 22.3.2012 by the respondents starting from District Collector to the Inspector of Police, Sankagiri so as to permit the petitioner, who belonged to Nadar community along with 7th respondent, who belonged to Kongu Vellar community and other communities people to participate and perform the festival of Sri Thanga Marriamma...
L.Jayaraman Vs. the State of Tamilnadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent under G.O.No.766 dated 25.10.2007 Labour and Employment Opportunity, Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu and quash the same and further direct the respondents to restore the promotion and increment benefits that accrue as in the due course of employment of the petitioner.O R D E R1. The petitioner, who was working as an Assistant in the District Employment Office at Cuddalore, was charge sheeted along with District Employment Officer and Junior Employment Officer, Tiruvannamalai. Since the misconduct committed by all the three of them were in relation to the same incident, a common enquiry was conducted in terms of Rule 9(A) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules by the order of the State Government in G.O.(D)No.310 Labour and Employment Department dated 13.04.2006.2. The charge against the pet...
P.Arumugam. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in the regular time scale of pay applicable to the B.T. Cadre post and confer all the consequential benefits.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in the regular time scale of pay applicable to the B.T. Cadre post and confer all the consequential benefits.2. Head Mr.C.Selvaraju, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.3. Petitioner seeks regularization of service in timescale of pay applicable to the B.T. Cadre post and consequential benefits. In this regard, petitioner made two representations dated 30.4.2008 and 2.5.2008 to the second respondent referring to G.O.Ms.No.53 Social Welfare and Nutritious ...
M.Santhi Vs. the Chairman. Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
PRAYER:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 6469 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by the first respondent in O.M.No.1194 A3-01 dt.31.07.2001 with consequential relief of issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Post Graduate Assistant in any one of the Schools.O R D E R1. The petitioner is a Post Graduate in Zoology with qualification of B.Ed. The petitioner got her name registered with the employment exchange.2. In pursuant to the advertisement, she appeared in Group IV examination and was selected and appointed as Junior Assistant in medical department on 02.08.1986 on recommendations of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. The petitioner thereafter was transferred to the Education department on 23.12.1989.3. In view of the fact that the petitioner was holding the qualification of M.Sc., B.Ed...
K.A.Asokan Vs. the Villupuram District Committee of Common Cadre
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings Na.Ka.No.2086/2005 Agrl. S S dated 29.5.2008 of the first respondent along with the order Rc 79886/08 SF 1, dated 19.12.2008 of the second respondent, quash both the orders and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking to challenge an order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the second respondent viz., Registrar of Cooperative Societies in dismissing his appeal as well as the order of dismissal dated 29.05.2008 passed by the first respondent. The petitioner preferred an appeal in terms of G.O.Ms.No.55 Cooperation Food and Consumer Protection Department dated 24.03.2000, wherein an appeal is provided as against termination in respect of employees coming under Common Cadre Service.2...
P.Poovendran Vs. the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the affairs of the petitioner club Elite Club as Sl.No.49/2011 situated at No.10/ 471-B-1, N.S.K.Nagar, Murugan Mill Bus Stop, Palladam Road, Tirupur District-641 605 or its members including the facilities provided for playing various games including the game of playing rummy not involving any element of gambling.O R D E R1. The Writ Petitioner claiming to be an executive member of Elite Club at NSK Nagar, Tirupur District has filed the present Writ Petition. It is stated by him that the Club is a registered Society with Registration No.49 of 2011 at Tirupur District. It is also stated by the petitioner that the Club consists of people from all walks of life including the businessman, landlords, employees. It appears that it has 7 members. The Club is also having various indoor games such as Table Tennis, Carom, Chess, Billiards...
B.Viswanathan Vs. Ramalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the petition and docket order dated 15.03.2012 made in E.A. SR.No.7226 of 2012 in E.P.No.206 of 2011 in RCOP No.1548 of 2005 on the file of the X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 15.03.2012 passed by the learned X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in E.A. SR.No.7226 of 2012 in E.P.No.206 of 2011 in RCOP No.1548 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Synoptically and succinctly, the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision would run thus:The revision petitioner was cited as the respondent in the RCOP filed by the respondent herein for eviction. Ultimately, the Rent Controller ordered eviction, as against which appeal was filed for nothing but to be dismissed, confirming the judgment of the Rent Controller, as against which revision was filed for nothing but to be dismissed, confirming the judgments of both the Courts below.3. The decree holder filed Execution...
T.Navaneethakrishnan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records of proceedings in Rc.No.6700/2009/C4 dated 8.10.2009 on the file of the 4th respondent and the consequential proceedings issued by the fifth respondent in No.50219/C2/2009 dated 15.10.2009 and quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the respondents to register the sale deed to be executed by the third respondent without demanding the Stamp Duty.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records of proceedings in Rc.No.6700/2009/C4 dated 8.10.2009 on the file of the 4th respondent and the consequential proceedings issued by the fifth respondent in No.50219/C2/2009 dated 15.10.2009 and quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the respondents to register the sale deed to be executed by the third respondent without dem...
S.Rajendran Vs. Jawahar Science College
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the charge memo in Memo No.JSC/E.2007-2008-12 dated 05.07.2007 of the first respondent quash the same and direct the first respondent to pay the petitioner exgratia for 2006-2007 as paid to other staff.C O M M O N O R D E R1. The two petitioners were teachers working in the first respondent college. The first petitioner is a Lecturer in Mathematics (Selection Grade) and the second petitioner is a Lecturer in Tamil (Selection Grade).2. Admittedly, the first respondent College is run by a society funded by Neyveli Lignite Corporation and it is an unaided college. Even then this Court has held that the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short Act) and the Rules framed thereunder will apply to the petitioner college, which was approved by a Division Bench in respect of the very same college vide judgmen...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »