Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
M.Thavamani Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to regularize the petitioner's services as Full Time Masalgi with all consequential, service and monetary benefits.ORDER1. The prayer in this writ petition is for a Mandamus to direct the first respondent herein to regularize the petitioner's services as Full Time Masalgi with all consequential, service and monetary benefits.2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined as Masalgi in Usilampatti Panchayat Union, Madurai in an existing vacancy on 01.03.1997. The petitioner has been continuously working as Masalgi from that date and his name has been recommended by the Director of Rural Development, Chennai for regularising his services as Masalgi. The petitioner has made representation to the Government on 26.03.2012 requesting to regularise his services in terms of G.O. Ms. No.22, P and AR Department dated 28.02.2006, but till date no order has been passe...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.Tsr Constructions Vs. the Municipal Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
W.P.No.1618 of 2012:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 7.1.2012, on the file of the first respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to consider the tender submitted by the petitioner for the work of providing BT surface at Muthu Vinayagam Muthu Vinayagam Koil Street, Karkana 2,3,4,5 Street, Kilnathur to By Pass Road, (Meenakshi Theatre, Vediappan Street, VOC Nagar, 8, 9 and 11th street, Aduthotti Street and Lakshmipuram Street, (Package I) in Ward No.2,15,19,18,25, 35 in Thiruvannamalai Municipality, under the Tamil Nadu Urban Roads Infrastructure Project 2011-2012.W.P.No.1619 of 2012:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedin...
Tag this Judgment!A.Venkatachalam. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to declare the road having a width of 30 feet comprised at Survey Nos.T.S.1448/3 Part, T.S.1449/2A, 1449/2B at Race Course, Coimbatore, as public road and consequently to implement the earlier Commissioner's order No.32789/83/H5 dated 22.02.1985 and provide all amenities as per rule, at the earliest point of time as may deemed fit by this Court.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to declare the road having a width of 30 feet comprised at Survey Nos.T.S.1448/3 Part, T.S.1449/2A, 1449/2B at Race Course, Coimbatore, as public road and consequently to implement the earlier Commissioner's order No.32789/83/H5 dated 22.02.1985 and provide all amenities as per rule, at the earliest point of time as may deemed fit by this Court.2. Mr.S.Shivakumar, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Venkateshwara Teacher Training Institute. Vs. the National Council ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records comprised in F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/28241, dated 18.4.2011, of the first respondent and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to grant recognition to Sri Venkateshwara Teacher Training Institute, SVG Puram village, Vanganur post, Pallipet Taluk, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu 631 304 for the Diploma in Teacher Education course from the academic year 2012-2013.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides.2. It has been stated that the petitioner Institution had been established by Sathya Sayee Educational Trust, which is a registered trust, established on 8.3.2012. The object of the trust is to impart education to the Telugu Linguistic Minorities, in the state of Tamil Nadu. As such, the said trust had established a Teacher Training Institute in the name and style of Sri Venkateshwara Teacher T...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.Medopharm. Vs. the Joint Secretary to the Govt. of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to Order No.75-76 of 2011-Cus dated 6.4.2011 passed by the 1st respondent herein and to quash the same and consequently to strike down the portion of the order dated 29.6.09 passed by the 5th respondent herein disallowing the claim of the petitioner for drawback concerning 5000 kgs of Metrinidazole and to hold that the petitioner is eligible for the payment of the entire drawback in respect of export of goods made by it under Shipping Bill Nos.1326488 dated 23.7.2001 and 1354643 dated 4.10.2001.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides.2. It has been stated that the petitioner firm is a partnership firm, registered with the Central Excise authorities. It has been granted the registration for the manufacture of excisable goods.3. The petitioner firm has also obtained the necessary licence, in term...
Tag this Judgment!V.Venkata Siva Kumar Vs. Institute of Chartered Accounts of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to publish the petitioner's rejoinder sent through a letter dated 16.3.2012 and acknowledged by the respondent in the earliest issue of the respondent's Students' Monthly Journal "THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT STUDENT" as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1993 SC 171 = 1993 (3) SCC 637.ORDER1. Whether at the instance of the petitioner, a direction can be issued to the respondent Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (for short ICAI) for publishing the petitioner s rejoinder sent via letter dated 16.03.2012 in their Students Monthly Journal known as the Chartered Accountants Student? is the question to be decided in this writ petition.2. Heard the petitioner in person. It is brought to the notice by the Registry that the petitioner had already filed a writ petition in the form of a Public Interest Litigation in W...
Tag this Judgment!S.Arif Mohammed. Vs. Vice Chancellor Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to publish the final year result of the petitioner's Registration No.52071316 for the MBBS examination held on February 2012 on the basis of his representations dated 30.03.2012 and 16.04.2012.O R D E R1. The petitioner, claimed to be the final year student in the Stanley Medical College, has filed the present writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to publish the final year results of the petitioner's Registration No.52071316 for the MBBS examination held during February 2012 on the basis of his representations dated 30.03.2012 and 16.04.2012 and to pass appropriate orders.2. In the representations which were referred to in the prayer, it is stated that the petitioner was surprised to see that his result was withheld and he is not aware of the reason for which the result was withheld and because of withholding of the results,...
Tag this Judgment!N.Dhanam. Vs. the Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the 2nd respondent in his proceeding U.Po/Ka.Sa/Ooty/Ko.Complaint/No.284/2011, dated 12.07.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to restore electricity service connection to the Petitioner's property bearing No.60, Clifton Cottage, Old Garden Road, Ooty, Nilgiris District 643 001.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would submit an application, under Rule 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from today. He had further submitted that it would suffice, if the second responden...
Tag this Judgment!T.Padmavathy. Vs. L.Selvaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Civil revision petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.10960 of 2011 in O.S.No.7858 of 1996.ORDER1. Inveighing and challenging the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.10960 of 2011 in O.S.No.7858 of 1996.2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, who would echo the cri de coeur of her client to the effect that despite the appeal having been disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court long ago, the trial court is rejecting the request of the petitioner for return of the documents found specified in I.A.No.10960 of 2011. According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, her client is ready to replace the said documents with the certified copies of the same.3. Considering the pro et contra, I am of the view that absolutely, there is no justification for the court ...
Tag this Judgment!M.Senthilkumar. Vs. the National Highways and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petition No.12317 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the possession and enjoyment by the petitioner of his property in Survey No.119/12A2 situate at Panpakkam Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District, totally measuring an extent of 289 square meter without depositing the compensation together with the solatium and additional market value as per judgment of this Court in W.P.No.15699 of 2010 etc., batch of cases dated 04.03.2011 and except in accordance with law.Writ Petition No.12318 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the possession and enjoyment by the petitioner of his property in Survey No.237/1DB Kilmudalambedu 1 (Panbakkam) 159 Sq.meter and in Survey No.237/7B Kilmudalambedu 1 (Panbakkam) 161 Sq.meter both are si...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »