N.Dhanam. Vs. the Divisional Engineer

N.Dhanam vs The Divisional Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 27, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/926929

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/926929
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren, J.
Decided On: Apr 27, 2012
Case Number: Writ Petition No.8475 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012
Subject: Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[M.JAICHANDREN, J.] Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, - Rule 27(4) -- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitio...

Key legal issue: Constitution
Acts & sections: Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, - Rule 27(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Dhanam

Advocate Mr.P.Muthukrishnan, Adv

Respondent

The Divisional Engineer

Advocate Mr.S.K.Raameshuwar. Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, - Rule 27(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226

Excerpt

[m.jaichandren, j.] tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004, - rule 27(4) -- heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. at this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would submit an application, under rule 27(4) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004, to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from today......643 001.order1. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. at this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would submit an application, under rule 27(4) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004, to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from today. he had further submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to consider the application to be submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with rule 27(4) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004, and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a specified period.4. the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this court passing such an order.5. in view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to make an application to the second respondent, under rule 27(4) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004, within a period of two weeks from today, along with the necessary fees and charges, if any. on such, application being submitted the second respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as the third respondent, within a period of four weeks thereafter. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. the writ petition is ordered accordingly. m.p.nos.1 and 2 of 2012 are closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the 2nd respondent in his proceeding U.Po/Ka.Sa/Ooty/Ko.Complaint/No.284/2011, dated 12.07.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to restore electricity service connection to the Petitioner's property bearing No.60, Clifton Cottage, Old Garden Road, Ooty, Nilgiris District 643 001.

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would submit an application, under Rule 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from today. He had further submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to consider the application to be submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with Rule 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a specified period.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order.

5. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to make an application to the second respondent, under Rule 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, within a period of two weeks from today, along with the necessary fees and charges, if any. On such, application being submitted the second respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as the third respondent, within a period of four weeks thereafter. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 are closed. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2012 Same Parties N.Dhanam vs The Divisional Engineer Same Subject Constitution Same Judge M.Jaichandren, J. Acts & Sections Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004, - Rule 27(4);...

Constitution