P. Arunagirisamy Vs The Director

P. Arunagirisamy vs The Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 29, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1658330

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1658330
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Jun 29, 2026
Case Number: WP(MD)/18090/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Arunagirisamy

Respondent

The Director

Excerpt

.....nadar,uravinmurai committee higher secondary school, represented by its school committee, ariyanayagipuram, kadaiyanallur taluk, tenkasi district. ... respondent(s) prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the appeal dated 28.03.2026 and pass necessary order to initiate further action in the administration of the fifth respondent as per the procedure in the interest of justice .for petitioner : mr. v.rajiv rufus for r1 - r5 : mr.m.mahaboob athiff, counsel for state for r6 : mr.v.meenakshi sundaramorderthis writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to consider the appeal dated 28.03.2026 and pass necessary order to initiate further action in the administration of the fifth respondent, as per the procedure in the interest of justice.2. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, though thiscourt, by order dated 30.01.2025 passed in w.p.(md) no.28194 of 2024, directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's objections with respect to the appointment to the vacancies, the said direction has not been complied with so far. therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to initiate contempt proceedings.3. granting such liberty, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.06.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes pkn to1. the director,2. the joint director,3. the chief educational officer, o/o. the chief educational officer,4. the district educational officer (secondary),5. the district educational officer, (elementary),m.dhandapani,j.pknorder made indated : 29.06.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP (MD) No.13405 of 2026 1.P.Arunagirisamy 2.V.Vellasamy ... Petitioner(s) vs.
1. The Director,
2. The Joint Director,
3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Officer,
4. The District Educational Officer (Secondary),
5. The District Educational Officer, (Elementary),
6. Ariyanayagipuram Hindu Nadar,
Uravinmurai Committee Higher Secondary School, Represented by its School Committee, Ariyanayagipuram, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the appeal dated 28.03.2026 and pass necessary order to initiate further action in the administration of the fifth respondent as per the procedure in the interest of justice .
For Petitioner : Mr. V.Rajiv Rufus For R1 - R5 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Counsel for State For R6 : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to consider the appeal dated 28.03.2026 and pass necessary order to initiate further action in the administration of the fifth respondent, as per the procedure in the interest of justice.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, though this

Court, by order dated 30.01.2025 passed in W.P.(MD) No.28194 of 2024, directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's objections with respect to the appointment to the vacancies, the said direction has not been complied with so far. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to initiate contempt proceedings.

3. Granting such liberty, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

1. The Director,

2. The Joint Director,

3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Officer,

4. The District Educational Officer (Secondary),

5. The District Educational Officer, (Elementary),

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

PKN

ORDER MADE IN

DATED : 29.06.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties P. Arunagirisamy vs The Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani