Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Padmavathi vs the Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.Padmavathi No.27B, Parvathiamman Koil Street, Ganesa Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai 600 099. Petitioner Vs Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration to declare the IInd Proviso of Section 18 of Securitization Act, 2002 as ultra vires the Constitution of India and declare it as null, void ab initio and non-est. For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s):Mr.K.Kumaran Government Pleader for R1 R2 - No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None for the petitioner when the matter is called out. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: THE HON&#...
I.Lakshmanan Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
C.M.P.No.4455 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.24704 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 655 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.Anton Dhanasekaran, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 655 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to any interest for the delay period i.e., for 655 days, in the appeal.22.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
VGN Developers Private Limited Vs J.Kalaivani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN AND M/s. VGN Developers Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Pratish Vedhappudi, At No.153, Wallace Garden, 2nd Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006. Presently having office at: Y-222, VGN, Kimberly Towers, 2nd Avenue, Y Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. J.Kalaivani W/o. Na.Rajesh, R/a, Flat F1, First Floor, C Block, Shanvi Apartments, Raja Nagar, Sunnambu Kolathur, Keelkattalai, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu - 600 117.2. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, District Collector, Chennai District Collector Office, Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62 Beach Road, George Town, Chennai 600 001.3. Purushothaman Tahsildar, Guindy Taluk, Page1 of 3 Guindy Taluk Office, Little Mount, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. ..Respondent(s)Contempt Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to set aside the order in Contem...
Suguna vs MD Tnstc Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
C.M.P.No.13517 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.31195 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 26 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 22.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Management of vs Appellate Authority Under the
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WMP Nos.7883, 24102 and 24103 of 2024 The Management of DBS Bank India Limited Corporate Office, No.4, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032 Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Petitioner Vs1. Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act Rep. by Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Office of Labour Commissioner, 4th Floor, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. 2.Kamineni Rama Rao RespondentsPRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1 st respondent in TNSE - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2023. For Petitioner: Mr.G.Sreenidhi for M/s.Agam Legal For Respondents: Mr.Chakkaravarthy, Government Counsel for R1, Mr.V. Subramani for R2ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the 1st respondent in TNSE - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2...
The Branch Manager Vs V Sivakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
C.M.P.No.14164, 14162 & 14167 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.Nos.7271, 33195 & 36808 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 48 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of these petitions being satisfactory, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered and consequently, the delay of 48 days in filing the appeals is condoned. 22.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, if they are, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mrs Saranya Sri Proprietor of Ms Sakthi Machineries Vs Ms MTL MARINE T ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in Mrs Saranya, Sri Proprietor of M/s.Sakthi Machineries, No.35, 9th Street Kamaraj Nagar, Avadi, Chennai - 600 071. ..Applicant Vs1. M/s.MTL MARINE TRANS LOGISTICSPVT LTD., (Delivery agent for OCEANIC STAR LINE AND SEA LEGEND AGENCY CO., LTD., (THAILAND) in Chennai/India) No.33/17, Thambu Chetty Street, 4th Level, Lakshmi Towers, Chennai - 600 001,2. M/s.Oceanic Horizons Pvt Ltd., New No.23, M Block, 10th Street, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 600 102,3. M/s.Dahnay Logistics Co., Ltd.,Floor 17, Krung Thonburi Road, Khlong Ton Sai Sub District, Bangkok - 10600 Thailand also at No.62, 9th Floor, K.G.N Towers Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. Page1 of 44. M/s.Sea Legend Agency Co Ltd., (As agent for Oceanic Stare Line in Thailand), Klongtoey, Bangkok 10110,5. Oceanic Star Line Pvt., Ltd.,(Rep. By its agent M/s.Sea Legend Agency Co., Ltd., in Thaildand) Suite No.501, Progressive...
Jesuraja Bakthan Daniel vs Federal Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and C.M.P.No.6532 of 2024 Jesuraja Bakthan Daniel Partner at M/s.Ooty Flora, Door No.87-D/47, Aseer Compound, Main Alwarpet, Coonoor, The Nilgiris-643 101. Petitioner Vs Federal Bank Ltd. LCRD-Coimbatore Division, No.21, 1st Floor, ML Lund Complex, V.H. Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore-641 001. RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore Bench to consider and pass orders in IA Diary Nos.1264/2024 in SA No.128 of 2024 as expeditiously as possible and on an early date. For Petitioner: Mr. Bhagavath Krishnan For Respondent: No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition is rendered infructuous.2. In light of the above, the civil revision peti...
C.Gokul Vs D.Sneha, I.A.S., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN C.Gokul S/o Chellappan, No.20A, Solai 3rd Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600 023. Petitioner Vs.1. D.Sneha, I.A.S.,The District Collector, Collectorate Office, 2.P.Sibin, I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, 3.Kumaran, The Inspector of Police, E-4, Kalpakkam Police Station, ECR Kalpakkam - 603 102. 4.Vasudevan, The Sub Inspector of Police, E-5 Koovathur Police Station, ECR Koovathur - 603 305. Contemnors Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents 1 to 4 for having committed the act of contempt by willfully, wantonly and deliberately disobeyed the order dated 09.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.12407 of 2024.Page Nos.1/5 For Petitioner: Mr.S.Pushpakaran For Respondent: Mr.Arun Anbumani, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERW.P.No.12407 of 2024 was filed seeking police protection to survey and put up compound wall in the petitioners patta la...
Jesuraja Bakthan Daniel vs Federal Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.8591 of 2024 Jesuraja Bakthan Daniel Partner at M/s.Ooty Flora, Door No.87-D/47, Aseer Compound, Main Alwarpet, Coonoor, The Nilgiris-643 101. Petitioner Vs 1.Federal Bank Ltd. LCRD-Coimbatore Division, No.21, 1st Floor, ML Lund Complex, V.H. Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore-641 001. 2.The Secretary, 3.The District Collector, 4.State Level Bankers Committee 5.Director of Horticulture and RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the One Time Settlement Scheme Proposal dated 3.3.2024 issued by the petitioner to the 1st respondent herein in terms of the order of the 3rd respondent dated 17.08.2018. For Petitioner: Mr. Bhagavath Krishnan For Respondents: R1 - No Appearance ...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »