Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Management of vs Appellate Authority Under the

The Management of vs Appellate Authority Under the

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 22, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1429187

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7060/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management of

Respondent

Appellate Authority Under the

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 22-06-2026coramthe honourable mr.justice k. surender wmp nos.7883, 24102 and 24103 of 2024 the management of dbs bank india limited corporate office, no.4, sardar patel road, guindy, chennai- 600 032 rep. by its authorised signatory petitioner vs1. appellate authority under the tamil nadu shops and establishments act rep. by special joint commissioner of labour, office of labour commissioner, 4th floor, teynampet, chennai-600 006. 2.kamineni rama rao respondentsprayer writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking to issue a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the 1 st respondent in tnse - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2023. for petitioner: mr.g.sreenidhi for m/s.agam legal for respondents: mr.chakkaravarthy, government counsel for r1, mr.v. subramani for r2orderthis writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the 1st respondent in tnse - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2023.2. today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel forthe petitioner would submit that the issues have been settled between the parties. to that effect, the learned counsel has filed a memo, dated 22.06.2026 along with the endorsement regarding settlement by both the parties.3. recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (k.surender j.) vum index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation:yes/no to 1.appellate authority under the tamil nadu shops and establishments act rep by special joint commissioner of labour, office of labour commissioner, 4th floor, teynampet, chennai-06. k.surender j. vum wmp nos.7883, 24102 and 24103 of 2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-06-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WMP Nos.7883, 24102 and 24103 of 2024 The Management of DBS Bank India Limited Corporate Office, No.4, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032 Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Petitioner Vs

1. Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act Rep. by Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Office of Labour Commissioner, 4th Floor, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. 2.Kamineni Rama Rao Respondents

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1 st respondent in TNSE - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2023. For Petitioner: Mr.G.Sreenidhi for M/s.Agam Legal For Respondents: Mr.Chakkaravarthy, Government Counsel for R1, Mr.V. Subramani for R2

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the 1st respondent in TNSE - 1/ 31/ 2020 and quash the order dated 25.08.2023.

2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

the petitioner would submit that the issues have been settled between the parties. To that effect, the learned counsel has filed a Memo, dated 22.06.2026 along with the endorsement regarding settlement by both the parties.

3. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (K.SURENDER J.) vum Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.Appellate Authority Under The Tamil Nadu Shops And Establishments Act Rep By Special Joint Commissioner Of Labour, Office Of Labour Commissioner, 4th Floor, Teynampet, Chennai-06. K.SURENDER J. vum WMP Nos.7883, 24102 and 24103 of 2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial