Manikandan Vs The State rep by

Manikandan vs The State rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1462604

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1462604
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan
Decided On: Jun 23, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/13389/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manikandan

Respondent

The State rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 23.06.2026coramthe honourable mr. justice c.kumarappan1.manikandan 2.nareshkumar ... petitioners vs. the state represented by the inspector of police, (crime no.232 of 2026) ... respondent prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in crime no.232 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.for petitioners : no appearance for respondent : mr.s.yogaraja sekar, government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioners were apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 296(b), 118(1), 115 and 351(3) of bns act and section 4 of tnphw act in crime no.232 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.c.kumarappan, j.2. when the matter was listed for hearing on 05.06.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 23.06.2026 (i.e.,) today.3. today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. hence, it is clear and evident that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.4. accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 23.06.2026 cda to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.06.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
1.Manikandan 2.Nareshkumar ... Petitioners Vs. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.232 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.232 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioners were apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 115 and 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.232 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

2. When the matter was listed for hearing on 05.06.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “For Dismissal” on 23.06.2026 (i.e.,) today.

3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, it is clear and evident that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 23.06.2026 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Manikandan vs The State rep by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan