Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, the Inspector of Police, vs H.Rajappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
Crl.O.P.No.27004 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.41027 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.Leave granted. 24.06.2026 ah Note : Registry is directed to number theCriminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand post the matter on 25.06.2026, for admission. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sparkle Gold Retail Ventures Limited Vs The State Rep By, The Inspecto ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
1. This Petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the impugned order, dated 21.05.2026, passed in Crl.MP.No.10975 of 2025.2. Heard Mr.Joshua H.Samuel, the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.M.Dinesh, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the Respondent.3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that the matter isurgent and that the Petitioner apprehends that as per the impugned orderdated 21.05.2026, the money to the tune of Rs.27,28,124/- may be withdrawn by the 3rd Respondent. Thus, the learned counsel submits that there are technical formalities in getting the certified copy of the impugned order and some other reasons have also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Petition and hence, production of certified copy of the impugned order may be dispensed with and that on the next date of hearing fixed, he will produce the certified copy of the impugned order before this Court, by way of a suppleme...
S.Shankar Ganesh Vs D.Sivaprakasam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.15496 of 2026 in CRP SR.No.103155 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Dispensed with for the present. 24.06.2026 mpa Note: Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition, after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order on 25.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Divisional Manager vs Koteeswaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.19507 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.119006 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 449 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. There is no representation for the respondent.3. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 449 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P. Ramamoorthy Vs S. David
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 4305 of 2023 AND CMP NO. 26236 OF 2023 P. Ramamoorthy Petitioner(s) Vs1. S. David 2.R.T.Sumithra Respondent(s) PRAYERTo set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.8.2023 passed in EA.No. X Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai, by dismissing the application in so far as of Schedule property in concerned, by allowing this revision. For Petitioner(s): No AppearanceORDERThis matter is listed under the caption for dismissal. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last hearing i.e. 17.06.2026, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. This petition is of the year 2023. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected CMP is closed. No costs. vga To 1.The X Assistant City Civil Court...
The Chairman Vs M.Shanmugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP Nos.30170, 30172, 30177, 30179, 30180 to 30182, 30184 to 30189 and 30191 to 30200 of 2024 in WA SR Nos.145845, 146852, 148097, 148692, 148694, 150014, 150027, 150072, 150149, 150205, 150791, 151196, 151563, 151591, 151596, 151611, 151615, 151644, 152336, 152725, 152876, 153718 and 155222 of 2024CMP No.30170 of 2024 The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited , 144 Anna Salai, Chennai 02 Appellant(s) VsM.Shanmugam S/o. Muthanna Devar, No. 41, Middle Street-1, R.N.Pudur Post, Erode - 5 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms. R.Aarthi for Mr. Arunprasad.K. Standing Counsel For Respondent(s):Mr. C.Prakasam for R1 to R3. Mr. R.Veeramani Government Pleader for R4 and R5. The Honble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon...
K.SURESH PRASANTH Vs The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR K.Suresh Prasanth S/o.Kaliappan ... Petitioner Vs1. The Superintendent of Police,Office of the Superintendent of Police, Erode District. Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to rd issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3 respondent-Inspector of Police, Gobichettipalayam Police Station, to conduct enquiry on the complaint dated 31.01.2024 (received on 03.02.2024) and reminder complaint dated 09.09.2025, in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent- Inspector of Police, Gobichettipalayam Police Station, to conduct enquiry on the complaint date...
Venkatesan Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL in Venkatesan ..Petitioner Vs The Management, Madurantakam Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Padalam, Kancheepuram District-603 308. ..Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to modify the order dated 18.09.2025 made in W.A.No.3158 of 2024 passed by this Court in the terms of the Settlement Agreement that is signed by parties as well as the counsel. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Shahin Banu for Mr.P.B.Suresh Babu For Respondent : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Haribabu *****ORDER(Made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)The present miscellaneous petition seeking modification of the orderdated 18.09.2025 passed in W.A.No.3158 of 2024 has been filed mainly on the ground that the learned counsel on record appearing on behalf of the Page1 of 2S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,...
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd Vs ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.27639 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.141683 of 2025 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 60 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Periyakkal Vs Venugopal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.32392 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.164480 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1015 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.S.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel who takes notice on behalf of the second respondent Insurance Company, vehemently opposed this petition being allowed.3. However, the reasons adduced inthe affidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 1015 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimants/petitioners will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 1015 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »