Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Divisional Manager vs Koteeswaran

The Divisional Manager vs Koteeswaran

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 24, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1479892

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/19507/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Koteeswaran

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.19507 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr.no.119006 of 2025a.d.jagadish chandira, j.this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 449 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.2. there is no representation for the respondent.3. the reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 449 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham note: registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.19507 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.119006 of 2025

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 449 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. There is no representation for the respondent.

3. The reasons adduced in the

affidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 449 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in

order and list the same for admission in due

course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties The Divisional Manager vs Koteeswaran Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales