Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd Vs Rajesh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
C.M.P.No.14738 of 2026 in CRP SR.No.36286 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Dispensed with for the present. 19.06.2026 rri Note: Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition, after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Pradeep Vs S.Aishwarya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
in Heard Mr.V.Vadivalagia Nambi, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.Raghul Jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this CriminalMiscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the criminal revision petition.3. Mr.Raghul Jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has reported no objection for allowing this petition.4. Therefore, it appears that both the respondents have nothing to say either to entertain the condonation petition or to justify the convincing reasons to condone the delay. dn5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in supportof this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 64 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 19.06.2026 dn Note: Office is directed to allot the regular number to C...
Shankar Vs Sengathir Selvan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
C.M.P.No.8266 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.46337 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1,355 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Ms.N.B.Surekha, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the second respondent, stated that she has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on the first respondent and his name is printed in the cause list, there is no representation on his behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 1,355 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to any interest for the delay period i.e., for 1,355 days, in the appeal. 19.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. h...
The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs P.Sankar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
CMP No.13755 of 2026 in CMA SR No.44394 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) Dispensed with for the present. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 19.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mathiyalagan Vs Swatha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
in Heard Mr.S.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner.2. It appears that notice has been issued to the respondent by the Registry in pursuant to the order dated 27.03.2026. As per the Office report dated 18.06.2026, notice has already been served on the respondent.3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent either in person or through his counsel.4.Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 08 days in filing the criminal revision petition. dn5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in supportof this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 08 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 19.06.2026 dn Note: Office is directed to allot the regular number to Crl.R.C., and list ...
N.Seit Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER N.Seit Petitioner Vs1. The Management,(Coimbatore) Ltd., Dharmapuri Region, Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri - 636 705. Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore. Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records in Gratuity Appeal No.64/2022 passed by second respondent dated 28.12.2022 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to pay arrears of gratuity of Rs.98,959/- with interest from 31.03.2015 apart from any other damages for the sufferings caused to the petitioner by negligent act of the respondents.For Petitioner: No appearance For Respondents: No appearanceORDERThis writ petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Gratuity Appeal No.64/2022 passed by second respondent dated 28.12.2022 and for a consequential direction to the first respondent to pay arrears...
E.Hemanathan vs Chief Revenue Controlling Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
C.M.P.No.12836 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.49105 of 2024A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 107 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.B.Karthikeyan, learned Government Advocate who takes notice on behalf of the respondents, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 19.06.2026 ham https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Abdhul Rahman Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Abdhul Rahman ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police S-7 Madipakkam Police Station Crime No.84 of 2023 ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in C.C.No.455 of 2023, pending trial on the file of the Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.S.Manikandan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition as not pressed and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 2C.KUMARAPPAN, J.skr2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel ...
The Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University Vs Sunil M.P.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and C.M.P.No.8824 of 2025 1.The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Rep. by its Vice Councilor, Perungudi Campus Perungudi 2.The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Rep. by its Registrar,3. The Controller of ExaminationThe Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Perungudi Campus, Perungudi, 4.The Dean School of Excellence in Law, Appellants Vs Sunil M.P. No.26/12, Barakka 2nd Street, Nammalwarpet, Chennai-600 012 Permanently residing at No.48/1, Sriramapuram, Anna Nagar, Panagudi-627 109. Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.10056 of 2025, dated 02.04.2024. For Appellants: Mr.M.NallathambiJUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the writ appeal. The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The...
The Manager, Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co Ltd., vs Meena
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
C.M.P.No.13853 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.80478 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 244 days in re- presenting the appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 244 days in re- presenting the appeal is condoned. 19.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »