Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Pradeep Vs S.Aishwarya

S.Pradeep vs S.Aishwarya

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 19, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1431541

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/4966/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Pradeep

Respondent

S.Aishwarya

Excerpt

in heard mr.v.vadivalagia nambi, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr.raghul jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this criminalmiscellaneous petition has been filed under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the criminal revision petition.3. mr.raghul jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has reported no objection for allowing this petition.4. therefore, it appears that both the respondents have nothing to say either to entertain the condonation petition or to justify the convincing reasons to condone the delay. dn5. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in supportof this criminal miscellaneous petition, the delay of 64 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 19.06.2026 dn note: office is directed to allot the regular number to crl.r.c., and list the case for admission on 22.07.2026 before the appropriate bench. in

Full Judgment

in Heard Mr.V.Vadivalagia Nambi, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.Raghul Jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal

Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the criminal revision petition.

3. Mr.Raghul Jaganathan, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has reported no objection for allowing this petition.

4. Therefore, it appears that both the respondents have nothing to say either to entertain the condonation petition or to justify the convincing reasons to condone the delay. dn

5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support

of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 64 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 19.06.2026 dn Note: Office is directed to allot the regular number to Crl.R.C., and list the case for admission on 22.07.2026 before the appropriate bench. in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties S.Pradeep vs S.Aishwarya Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Shamim Ahmed

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales