Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Chellammal Vs Logapriya

Chellammal vs Logapriya

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 25, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1685420

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/19463/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chellammal

Respondent

Logapriya

Excerpt

c.m.p.(md) no.19463 of 2025 in c.m.a.(md)sr.no.97804 of 2025k.murali shankar,j.the above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award passed in m.c.o.p.no.116 of 2022 dated 04.07.2025 on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal / additional district court, virudhunagar.2. despite receipt of notice, the first respondent failed to enter into appearance.3. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.4. considering the reasons assignedand taking note of the quantum of delay, this court is inclined to condone the delay. accordingly, this petition is ordered and the registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list it for admission in the usualcourse. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.(MD) No.19463 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.97804 of 2025

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.116 of 2022 dated 04.07.2025 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional District Court, Virudhunagar.

2. Despite receipt of notice, the first respondent failed to enter into appearance.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

4. Considering the reasons assigned

and taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in

order and list it for admission in the usual

course. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Chellammal vs Logapriya Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales