Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General vs Chinniah (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., 2nd Floor, Khadi Bhavan, TPK Road, Madurai. Through its Branch Manager ... Appellant/ 2nd Respondent Vs. A.Chinniah (Died) 1.Chinnammal 2.Rakkammal 3.Kannammal 4.Pothimponnu 5.Durai 6.Panchavarnam ... Respondents 1 to 6/ Petitioners 7.M.S.Shajahan ... 7th Respondent/ 1st Respondent PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.148 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (IV Additional Sub Court), Madurai dated 21.02.2018. For Appellant : M/s.K.R.Shivashankari For Respondents : No appearanceJUDGMENTThe Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.148 of 2012 dated 21.02.2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / IV Additional Sub Court, Madurai.2. When the matter ...
M/S.National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Ayyasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.13182 and 13184 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.662 of 2020K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petitions have been filed seeking orders (i) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent and (ii) to bring on record the respondents 9 and 10 herein as legal representatives of the deceased second respondent and rank them as respondents 9 and 10 in the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 3 to 6, 9 and 10.3. Since the petitioner's applicationin CMP(MD)No.13180 of 2025 to condone the delay in filing the petition for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent is allowed today, these petitions are ordered and the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the main papers and post the same on 16.04.2026. 01.04.2026 (2/2) csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/S.National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Ayyasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.13180 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.662 of 2020K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 24.03.2026, the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) and they have filed a Memo dated 27.03.2026 to that effect and also produced the copy of the receipt. The above said Memo is recorded.2. In view of the above, this petition is ordered. 01.04.2026 (1/2) csm 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sunderraj Vs Dr.Narnaware Manish Sankara Rao IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in Sundarraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Narnaware Manish Sankara Rao The District Collector, 2.K.Murugeshwaran The Tahsildar, 3.Udayakumar Managing Director, 4.Saravanan, Tahsildar, Tiruppur District. ... Respondents (R4 is suo motu impleaded as per order of this Court dated 08.10.2025 in Cont.P.(MD)No.2457 of 2025 by GRSJ) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents 1 & 2 for deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 18381 of 2024, dated 02.08.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Srinivasaragavan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government AdvocateORDERThe order of this Court has been substantially complied with. The contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To 1.The District Collector, 2.The Tahsildar, 3.Managing Director, 4.Tahsildar, Tiruppur District...
P. Mohamed Sherif Vs The Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI P.Mohamed Sherif, S/o. Pudur Bava, D.No.218, Middle Street, Kazhukerkadai Village, Thirupuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District. ...Petitioner Vs1. The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai.2. The Director, Chennai.3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,4. The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Sivagangai District,5. The Inspector,6. Mrs.Revathi,The President of Kazhukerkadai Panchayat (In-charge), Kazhukerkadai Village, Thirupuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd and 5th respondents herein to take action upon the petitioner's representation dated 01.10.2024 which is still pending before them. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Venkatesan Advocate For Respo...
Natchathira Sathya .M Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
and W.A.(MD)Nos. SR 79473 & 79474 of 2024 AND (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) These petitions are filed seeking to condone the delay of 302 and 302 days, respectively in filing the above writ appeals. 2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents has not raised any serious objection to the petitions being allowed. 3.Accepting the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, the delay is condoned and these petitions are ordered. Registry is directed to number the writ appeals, if the papers are otherwise in order. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] ta AND ta and W.A.(MD)Nos.SR 79473 & 79474 of 2024...
Muniyandi Vs The District collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and Muniyandi ... Petitioner Vs.4. K.Valangaipuli5. Om Sri Ayyappan Arakattalai, Through its Managing Trustee, S.Rajaram ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in SVGREV/848/2022-A1 dated 12.12.2022 quash the same further direct the respondents 1 to 2 to break open the seal of the Om Sri Ayyappa Temple, Rayagiri belonging to the 5th respondent Trust and permit the trust to perform the daily pooja, Mandala Poojan, Annathanam and procession and other rituals regularly and to pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.For Petitioner :Mr.T.S.R.Venkataramana For R1 and R2 :Mr.P.Thambi Durai Government...
Minor.Sathiyaprakash @ Suryaprakash Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.16239 of 2025 in Cros.Obj(MD)SR.No.75261 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to exempt the petitioner from paying Court fee of Rs.9,300/- in filing the cross objection.2. When the matter is taken uptoday, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that they have paid the requisite Court fee and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.4. The Registry is directed to number the cross objection, if it is otherwise in order and post the same along with the main appeal. 01.04.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.S.Rajendran Vs S.S.Rajmohan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in M.S.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.S.S.Rajmohan Managing Director, 2.Jebaraj Navamani, General Manager, 3.K.Bama Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Employee Pensions Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors / respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.190 of 2021, dated 27.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah for R1 & R2 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh for R3ORDERThe order passed by this Court has been complied with. The contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmiG.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.rmi in...
Azhagarsamy Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
W.M.P(MD)No.24893 of 2025 W.M.P(MD)No.24893 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.24687 of 2025 D.BHARATHACHAKRAVARTHY, J.Considering the averments made in the affidavit, this petition is ordered and the amendment is ordered as prayed for. 2.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the amended copy of the affidavit to the learned Special Government Pleader. 01.04.2026 Ns 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 494
- 495
- 496
- 497
- 498
- 499
- 500
- 501
- 502
- 504
- Next ›
- Last »