Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muniyandi Vs The District collector

Muniyandi vs The District collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 01, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1673805

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/28427/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muniyandi

Respondent

The District collector

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 01.04.2026coramthe honourable mr justice d.bharatha chakravarthy and muniyandi ... petitioner vs.4. k.valangaipuli5. om sri ayyappan arakattalai, through its managing trustee, s.rajaram ...respondentsprayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in svgrev/848/2022-a1 dated 12.12.2022 quash the same further direct the respondents 1 to 2 to break open the seal of the om sri ayyappa temple, rayagiri belonging to the 5th respondent trust and permit the trust to perform the daily pooja, mandala poojan, annathanam and procession and other rituals regularly and to pass such further or other orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.for petitioner :mr.t.s.r.venkataramana for r1 and r2 :mr.p.thambi durai government advocate for r3 :mr.k.gnanasekaran government advocate (crl.side)orderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition. he has also submitted a letter dated 30.03.2026, to the registrar (judicial), madras high court madurai bench, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition based on the instruction from the petitioner.2. recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ncc:yes/no rgm tod.bharatha chakravarthy, j.rgm and

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 01.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and Muniyandi ... Petitioner Vs.

4. K.Valangaipuli

5. Om Sri Ayyappan Arakattalai, Through its Managing Trustee, S.Rajaram ...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in SVGREV/848/2022-A1 dated 12.12.2022 quash the same further direct the respondents 1 to 2 to break open the seal of the Om Sri Ayyappa Temple, Rayagiri belonging to the 5th respondent Trust and permit the trust to perform the daily pooja, Mandala Poojan, Annathanam and procession and other rituals regularly and to pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner :Mr.T.S.R.Venkataramana For R1 and R2 :Mr.P.Thambi Durai Government Advocate For R3 :Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also submitted a letter dated 30.03.2026, to the Registrar (Judicial), Madras High Court Madurai Bench, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition based on the instruction from the petitioner.

2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. NCC:Yes/No rgm To

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

rgm and

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial