Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J.K.Merlin vs R.Divakaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR J.K.Merlin, D/o. John Kennadi, No. 1A/4, Kamarajar Street, KK Pudur, Saibaba Colony, Coimbatore 641 043. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Divakaran, S/o.Remigius, Poriyalur Nagar 2nd Street, Thiruppalai, Madurai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to modify the order dated passed by this Court in CRP.No.4056 of 2024 insofar as the visitation timings are concerned, by suitably regulating the visitation to a limited duration of one hour on the first Saturday of every month in a phased and child-sensitive manner, considering the welfare and psychological well being of the minor child, and direct the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore District to dispose of DOP.No.140 of 2022 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court.For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Anbalagan For Respondent(s): Mr. K.T.S.Sivakumar for Mr. C.M.Arumugam Page1 of 5ORDERThis petition has b...
Paranjothi Vs A. Anthoniraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Paranjothi ..Petitioner(s) Vs A. Anthoniraj The Revenue Tahsildar, Tittagudi Taluk, Tittagudi - 606 106. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 praying to punish the Respondent for committing contempt of court for not obeying the order passed by this Court in WP.31627 of 2024 dated 13.11.2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr. P.Tamilalagan For Contemnor(s): Mr. P.Balathandayutham, Special Government Pleader Page1 of 3OrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.31627 of 2024 dated 13.11.2024.2. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.31627 of 2024 dated 13.11.2024 has been complied with.3. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SRN ...
R.Chandran Vs Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA R.Chandran. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary To Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the 1st respondent for wilful disobeyal of the orders of the Court madras made in W.P.No. 37169 of 2024 dated 10.12.2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Ranganathan For Contemnor(s): Mr. C.Selvaraj Additional Government Pleader Page1 of 3OrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No. 37169 of 2024 dated 10.12.2024.2. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No. 37169 of 2024 dated 10.12.2024 has been complied with.3. Recording the above statement, the contempt petitio...
Suresh.R vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
W.M.P.No.12459 of 2026 in Writ Petition No.43369 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andK.SURENDER, J.This petition has been filed seeking to amend the cause title by amending the address of the sixth respondent by adding No.217, Kulathu Street, Malayampattu Village, Pungambadi Post, Thiruvannamalai District 606 903 instead of Arni Taluk, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District.2. This petition is ordered as prayed for. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in all the concerned records. [S.M.S., J.] [K.S., J.] 29.04.2026 (1/2) gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Madhavi Vs B.Balamurali
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 630 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1&3.3. The learned counsel for the 3 rd respondent has no serious objection to allowing the application.4. The 1st petitioner would aver that, due to her illiteracy, she was not awareof the time limit prescribed for preferring an appeal and had no knowledge about the procedure for filing the same. She would further aver that, owing to financial constraints, a delay of 630 days has occurred in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit enclosedwith the petition, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 630 days alone shall stand waived. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. nvi Page No.1 / 2 nvi Page No.2 /...
B.Shankar Prasad Vs SPS Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP No. 9504 of 2026 in C.R.P S.R No. 39909 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Ordered as prayed for. 29.04.2026 pbl Note: Registry is directed to number this petition and list the case on 30.04.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Sunitha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP.No.10962 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.9145 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Mr.Amar D.Pandiya, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalath for the first respondent.3. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent does not have any serious objections in allowing the application.4. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 29.04.2026 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Lalithkumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP.No.10967 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.9144 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Mr.Amar D.Pandiya, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalath for the first respondent.3. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent does not have any serious objections in allowing the application.4. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 29.04.2026 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
C.K.Govindan Nair(Deceased) Vs Shree Vijay Shanthi Suriswariji Pratish ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CMP.No.8091 of 2026 C.K.Govindan Nair(Deceased) 1.Malu Amma (Deceased)2. C.K.Sadanandan S/o.Late Shri krishnan Nair alias Pythal Nair, Old No.14, New No.31, Ballard Street, Agaram PO, Jawahar Nagar, Chennai 600 082. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Shree Vijay Shanthi Suriswariji Pratishtha Samiti,2. Shree Vijay Shanthi Suriswarji Jain Guru Mandir3. Shree Vijay Shanthi Suriswarji Jain Baktha MandalAll at No.68, Arunachala Naicken Street, Chintadripet, Chennai-600 002. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed to condone the delay of 76 days in filing an application to set aside abatement caused due to the death of the Sole Petitioner Mallu Amma on 31.7.2025 and thus render justice. Page1 of 4 In all CMPS:- For Appellant(s): Mr.M.Arunkumar for Sampathkumar and Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Senthil Kumar for RR1 to 3COMMON ORDERCMP.No.8091 of 2026 has been filed to condone...
Nallasamy vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Nallasamy S/o.Kandhasamy 67 Punjai Thalaiyur Nanjai Thalaiyur Post Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus d irecting the 1st respondent herein to conduct an enquiry based on the representation dated 07.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.U.Venkatesh For Respondent(s): Mrs.E.Ranganayaki Additional Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no orderas to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl To THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.(kpl)...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »