Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ponnaiah, Vs Selvakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Ponnaiah ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Mr.Selvakumar The Tahsildar, Eral Taluk, Eral, Thoothukudi District. ... Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor/respondent under Section 11 of contempt of Curts Act, 1971 for willfully disobeying the order dated 13.10.2022 passed in W.P(MD)No.23614 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr..M.Vishnu Varthanan For Respondent : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders of this Court dated 13.10.2022 made in W.P(MD) No.23614 of 2022.2. According to the petitioner, the order of this Court has not beencomplied with. The petitioner originally filed writ petition in W.P(MD)No.23614 of 2022...
Radhakrishnan, Vs V. Bala Murugan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs- V.Balamurugan Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnor / Respondent No.4 PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor herein/ Respondent No.4 for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 07.01.2026 passed in W.P.(MD) No.243 of 2026, which is amounting to contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971... For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vashik Ali For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government PleaderORDERThis petition has been filed to punish the Contemnor/ respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No. 243 of 2026 dated 07.01.2026.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that theorder dated 07.01.2026 has been complied with.3...
Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Committee Higher Secondary School, Vs A. Renuk ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARin Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Committee Higher Secondary School, Through its Secretary/Correspondent, T.Thangaraj, ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs A.Renuka, Tenkasi. ... Contemnor/3rd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor/3rd respondent herein in the writ petition for her deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 28.11.2025 passed in W.P.(MD).No.34118 of 2025 which is amounting to contempt of courts under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass such further or other suitable orders. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government PleaderORDERThe instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder of this Court dated 28.11.2025 made in W.P.(MD)No.34118 of 2025.2. The learned Additional Government Pleader...
S.Karuppasamy Vs V.Sivakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR in S.Karuppasamy ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs V.Sivakumar, Tirunelveli. ... Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to summon the contemnor/respondent herein and punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD).No. 28106 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan For Respondent : Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro Standing CounselORDERThe instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder of this Court dated 20.11.2025 made in W.P.(MD)No.28106 of 2025.2. The learned Counsel appearing on either side submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with, accordingly, proceedings dated 19.03.2026 have been issued.3. Recording the same, this contempt petition stands closed. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No I...
K. Rajesh Kumar, Vs N.O. Sukhaputra, I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY K. Rajesh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the contemnors herein / respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 04.12.2025 passed in W.P.(MD)No.35008 of 2025 which is amounting to Contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vashik Ali For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government AdvocateORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Government Advocate that the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.35008 of 2025 dated 04.12.2025, has already been complied with by the respondent.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. 27.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr ToS.SRIMATHY, J.jbrORDER MADE INCont P.(MD)No.746 of 2026...
Syed Samsudeen Vs B.Vasanthan IFS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Syed Samsudeen ... Petitioner Vs Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnor/Respondent No.3 herein for his willful disobedience to the order passed by this Court in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.300 of 2026 dated 02.02.2026 and punish him accordingly. For Petitioner : Mr.Sma Jinnah For Respondent : Mr.K.Govindarajan, Deputy Solicitor General of IndiaORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel on either side that the order passed by this Court in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.300 of 2026 dated 02.02.2026, has already been complied with by the respondent.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. 27.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr To Madurai.S.SRIMATHY, J.jbrORDER MADE INCont P.(MD)No.718 of 2026...
S. Chandradevi, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL MP(MD) No. 6699 of 2026 and Crl.O.P(MD) No.23721 of 2025 S.Chandradevi ...Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, (Crime No. 424 of 2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Sasikumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (crl.side) Prayer:To pass an order to relax the condition imposed in Crl OP(MD) No.23721 of 2025 dated 05.01.2026ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl OP(MD) No.23721 of 2025 dated 05.01.2026. 2.Heard both sides. 3.Considering the nature of offence and also the fact that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly, this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in toto. 4.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 27-03-2026 aav To The Inspector Of Police,...
Rajendran, Vs K. Elambahavath,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Rajendran ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs- Thoothukudi District. ... Contemnors / Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for the wilful disobedience of order dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.21619 of 2025 and punish them for contempt. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government PleaderORDERThis petition has been filed to punish the Contemnors/ respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No. 21619 of 2025 dated 07.08.2025.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that theorder dated 07.08.2025 has been complied with.3. Recording the above submission, this Contempt Petition is closed as nothing survives f...
The Branch Manager vs Rajesh,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.3481 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)No.974 of 2023K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking an order for substituted service of notice on the third respondent by way of paper publication in any one of Tamil daily having circulation in Bangalore. 2.Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the third respondent by paper publication in English Daily viz., Indian Express, in Bangalore Edition, indicating the date of hearing as 28.04.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 18.04.2026.4. Post the matter on 28.04.2026. das 27.03.2026 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, Vs S.Shanmugam Pil ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
C.M.P.(MD).No.3942 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)SR. No.35726 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 308 days in paying the deficit Court fee of Rs.10,780/- in the above appeal in C.M.A(MD)SR. No.35726 of 2025. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the records.3. It is evident from the records that the petitioner's earlier application to condone the delay in representing the appeal papers in CMP(MD)No.3261 of 2026 came to be allowed on 13.03.2026.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and accordingly, this petition is ordered. 27.03.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »