Ponnaiah, Vs Selvakumar,

Ponnaiah, vs Selvakumar,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1583203

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1583203
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman
Decided On: Mar 27, 2026
Case Number: CONT P(MD)/945/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ponnaiah,

Respondent

Selvakumar,

Excerpt

.....under section 11 of contempt of curts act, 1971 for willfully disobeying the order dated 13.10.2022 passed in w.p(md)no.23614 of 2022. for petitioner : mr..m.vishnu varthanan for respondent : mr.s.p.maharajan special government pleaderorder(order of the court was made by n.sathish kumar, j.) the present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders of this court dated 13.10.2022 made in w.p(md) no.23614 of 2022.2. according to the petitioner, the order of this court has not beencomplied with. the petitioner originally filed writ petition in w.p(md)no.23614 of 2022 seeking direction to the second respondent therein to complete the enquiry on the basis of the summon viz proceedings in a1/1555/2020 dated 11.08.2021. this court by an order dated 13.10.2022 directed the authorities to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording sufficient opportunity to all the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. according to him, no enquiry was conducted.3. the learned special government pleader appearing for the respondentswould submit that the private respondents filed a suit in o.s.no.11 of 2023, on the file of the ii additional district court, tuticorin and wherein, the writ petitionis also made as one of the defendant in the suit and the said suit is pending, that apart, land in question is grama natham. therefore, when the suit is pending, the enquiry could not be completed. considering this aspect, the issue is pending before the civil court and the writ petitioner is also made as one of the defendant and hence, the rights of the parties should be decided in the civil suit.in view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. the petitioner can review the applications based ont he decision of the civil court. [n.s.k.,j.] [m.j.r.,j.] 27.03.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes am to mr.selvakumar the.....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Ponnaiah ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Mr.Selvakumar The Tahsildar, Eral Taluk, Eral, Thoothukudi District. ... Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor/respondent under Section 11 of contempt of Curts Act, 1971 for willfully disobeying the order dated 13.10.2022 passed in W.P(MD)No.23614 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr..M.Vishnu Varthanan For Respondent : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders of this Court dated 13.10.2022 made in W.P(MD) No.23614 of 2022.

2. According to the petitioner, the order of this Court has not been

complied with. The petitioner originally filed writ petition in W.P(MD)No.23614 of 2022 seeking direction to the second respondent therein to complete the enquiry on the basis of the summon viz proceedings in A1/1555/2020 dated 11.08.2021. This Court by an order dated 13.10.2022 directed the authorities to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording sufficient opportunity to all the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. According to him, no enquiry was conducted.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents

would submit that the private respondents filed a suit in O.S.No.11 of 2023, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Tuticorin and wherein, the writ petition

is also made as one of the defendant in the suit and the said suit is pending, that apart, land in question is Grama Natham. Therefore, when the suit is pending, the enquiry could not be completed. Considering this aspect, the issue is pending before the Civil Court and the writ petitioner is also made as one of the defendant and hence, the rights of the parties should be decided in the civil suit.

In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. The petitioner can review the applications based ont he decision of the Civil Court. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 27.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes am To Mr.Selvakumar The Tahsildar, Eral Taluk, Eral, Thoothukudi District.

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

and

M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

am DATED : 27.03.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ponnaiah, vs Selvakumar, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice ...