Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
I.Naveenkumar (22102036) Vs The Directorate of Technical Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR I Naveenkumar (22102036) Department of AI & DS, Residential Address I.Naveenkumar S/o Ilaiyaraja Valantharavai, Ramanathapuram Taluk and District. .. Petitioner Vs 3.The Principal Eachanari, ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents and in more particularly to direct the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to rejoin and pursue his B.Tech course from 6th semester onwards till completion of 8th semester. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugan For Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Govt. Advocate for R1 M/s Jasmia Yasmin for R2 ` Mr.Lakshminarayanan for R3ORDERThe petitioner is before this Court, seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to permit the petitioner to rejoin and pursue the B.Tech course from the 6th semester onwar...
K. Radhakrishnan Vs Mr. S. Saravanan IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN K.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.S.Saravanan, IAS, The District Collector, 2.V.Sanjay Gandhi, The Tahsildar, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor No.1/first respondent and contemnor No.2/third respondent and punish him for the wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P. (MD)No.25202 of 2018 dated 06.09.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This contempt petition is filed alleging disobedience of theorder of this Court dated 06.09.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.25202 of 2018.2.The learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that pursuant to the orders of thi...
Jayaprakash Vs The Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.2152 of 2023 & 6546 of 2025 Jayaprakash ... Petitioner Vs Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order in Ref.R & D/2002-2023/ Establishment/2 dated 03/01/2023 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinoharan for M/s.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : No appearanceORDERThe learned Counsel for the petitioner taking into consideration of the fact that the contractual period for which the petitioner was appointed already come to an end and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh representation before the respondent University.2. In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn wi...
Mariya Pushpam vs Seelan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and CMP(MD)No.3585 of 2023 Mariya Pushpam ... Petitioner vs. Seelan ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the impugned order dated 01.07.2022 in I.A.Nos.10 of 2022 in O.S.No.123 of 2018 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthik *****ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit in O.S.No.123 of 2018, has been decreed in favour of the petitioner and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :Yes / No 02.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No Nsr To: The Principal District...
Mariya Pushpam vs Seelan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and CMP(MD)No.3686 of 2023 Mariya Pushpam ... Petitioner vs. Seelan ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the impugned order dated 01.07.2022 in I.A.Nos.11 of 2022 in O.S.No.123 of 2018 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthik *****ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit in O.S.No.123 of 2018, has been decreed in favour of the petitioner and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :Yes / No 02.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No Nsr To: The Principal District...
Thiyagu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Thiyagu ... Petitioner -vs- Madurai City. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of petitioner's wife namely, Gayathri, W/o.L.Thiyagu, Female, aged about 36 years, before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public ProsecutorORDER[Made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] This habeas corpus petition was filed by the husband to produce the body of his wife and set her at liberty.2. This Court directed the second respondent to find the whereabouts of thedetenue. The detenue was produced before the Court today. When we inquired of the detenue, she stated that she is not on good terms with the petitioner...
Palanivelrajan PN Vs The Sale Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.3257 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No.2685 of 20261. P.N.Palanivelrajan2. P.Murugeswari ...Petitioners Vs1. The Sale Officer,(Under Multi State Cooperative Bank), Attached to the Repatriates Co-Operative Finance and Development Bank Limited, Repco Bank, Repco Tower, No.33, North Usman Street, T.Nagar, Chennai 17.2. The Repco Home Finance and Development Bank Limited, (Called as Repco Bank), Represented by its Authorized Signatory, No.33, North Usman Road, T. Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.3. The Branch Manager, Repco Bank, 38, Krishnarayar Tank Road, Madurai - 625 001. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertains to Public Auction Sale Notice dated 06.01.2026 issued by the 1st respondent who appointed under the Multi-state Co-operat...
Saburammal Vs The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Saburammal rep. by Power Agent, V.Villayudham ... Petitioner Vs1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram Division,2. The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram,3. Syed Ayesha Umma4. Sithi Hajara5. Fathima Silmiya6. Syed Ahmed Idris7. Shamsun Hitha8. Mohammed Padhivusasaman9. Ayesha Sulaiha ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to speedy disposal of the petitioners petition in Na.Ka.No.B10/1520/2026 dated 07.01.2025 pending before the first respondent to issue the Patta for the property situated at S.No.638/2 in Rameshwaram Group, Vethaalai Village, Ramanathapuram Taluka, Ramanathapuram District within a time stipulated by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr. B.Mahendrarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition ...
Vetriselvam Vs Deivendran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Vetriselvam ...Petitioner/Complainant Vs Deivendran ...Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to direct the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, to expedite and complete the Trial in CC No.99 of 2024 within stipulated time framed by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.S.SrikanthORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, to expeditiously complete the trial in C.C.No.99 of 2014.2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is ready for trial and it is being adjourned due to non-appearance of the accused person.3. Considering the above said facts, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, is directed to dispose of C.C.No.99 of 2024, within a period of 6(six) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.4. With the above sa...
M.Viswanathan Vs Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.376 OF 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Viswanathan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Mr.Ravichandran, Tahsildar, Dindigul District. ... Contemnor / Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to take appropriate proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act and punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.9841 of 2024 dated 29.04.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathisankar For Respondent : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.376 OF 2026ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: The Tahsildar, Dindigul District. 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.376 OF 2026G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.PMU...
- ‹ Prev
- 534
- 535
- 536
- 537
- 538
- 540
- 541
- 542
- 543
- 544
- Next ›
- Last »