Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The commissioner, Erode City Municipal corporation, Vs S. Ahaseer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
in and (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 23 days in filing the above writ appeals.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.Bala & Daisy, learned counsel accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 9 in C.M.P.No.3435 of 2026 and for the first respondent in C.M.P.No.3403 of2026. Mr.R.Neethiperumal, learned Government Advocate accepts notice forthe 10th respondent in C.M.P.No.3435 of 2026 and for the second respondent in C.M.P.No.3403 of 2026 and they have no serious objection in allowing these petitions.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay is condoned. and vji5. Registry is directed to number these appeals and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J.) 26.03.2026 in...
MR. Nanthagopal M Vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.03.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Nanthagopal M S/o.Mottai Gounder, Seeyapoondy Village Manandal Post Mel Malayanaur, Gingee TK Villupuram District- 604 204 Tamil Nadu State. Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu The Home Secretary (IAS) Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein, particularly the 1 and 3rd respondents corporation/municipal corporation to consider the petitioners representation dated on 08.12.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Maharajan For Respondents: Mr. K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R1, R3 and R4 Mr. P.Ebenezer Paul Standing Counsel for R2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.2. The writ petit...
M/s.Arcot Sabith Alisha Makkan Masjit Vs The Chairman-cum-Managing Dir ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP.No.4974 of 2023 M/s.Arcot Sabith Alisha Makkan Masjit, Kudiyiruppu Vaasigal Nala Sangam, Registration No.29/2022, Rep. by its President N.Mubarak, No.55, Second Street, Sabith Alisha Nagar, Chennai-Bengaluru Bye Pass Road, ..Petitioner(s) Vs No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1st to 3rd to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representations dated 30.01.2023 and consequently directing the 1st and 3rd respondents herein to give the necessary Electricity Service Connection to the members Petitioners Association at Sabith Alisha Nagar, Chennai-Bengaluru Bye Pass Road, Arcot, Ranipet District. For Petitioner(s): No AppearanceFor Respondent(s): Mr.S.Madhusudharan Standing CounselORDERThis Writ Petition h...
A.S.Meganathan (Died) 1. Arulozhi vs the Special Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
C.M.P.No.2820 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.16179 of 2020R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the present petitioners who are the legal heirs of the original respondent viz., A.S.Meganathan, who is no more, hence this petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J.) 26.03.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Manager, Sbi General Insurance Company Ltd vs Boopal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
CMP.No.7313 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.120354 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 191 days to pay the deficit court fee in the above Civil Miscellaneous appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 191 days in paying the deficit court fee is hereby condoned. 26.03.2026 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Manager, Sbi General Insurance Company Ltd vs Boopal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
CMP.No.7312 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.120354 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 170 days in representing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 26.03.2026 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.F.Ashik Ali Vs Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar IAS and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA A.F.Ashik Ali S/o.Late A.H.Farouck, Residing at No.1/11, Bharathi Nagar, Annaimalai, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore 641 402 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar IAS Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George,Chennai 600 009.2. P.Ponniah IAS The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. ..Contemnor(s)PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to issue summon and punish the respondent No.1 and 2 for their act of contempt of court deliberately disobeying the order in W.P.No.32281 of 2024 dated 30.01.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Venkadesh Kumar For Contemnor(s): Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, SGP Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, it is informed by the lea...
Saravanan Sambandam vs Radhika
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR IN Saravanan Sambandam ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Radhika2. Thilagavathy3. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police,4. Amudhavalli5. Kannan6. Navaroopan7. Venkatesan8. Senthil Kumar Alias Kullakandai9. Arunagiri ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: This petition is filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.10 in the above Crl.O.P. No.30749 of 2025, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Suresh For Respondent(s): Mr.Adinarayana Rao for R1 Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam,Public Prosecutor For R3 Page1 of 2 M.NIRMAL KUMAR J.OrderThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to implead the proposed respondent viz., Mr.Saravanan Sambandam, S/o.Sambandam, as 8th respondent in the above Crl.O.P. No.30749 of 2025 is hereby ordered. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No Note: Registry is directed to carry out the necessa...
Sree Ganesh Vs The Chairman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Sree Ganesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Anna Salai,..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to disconnect the electricity supply in number 028- 023 -20 provided to the 3rd respondent temple situated at S.No.1111 / 2 B1A located at Annai Sathiya Nagar, Moolakadai, Madavaram, Chennai- 600 110. For Petitioner(s): Mrs.Srimathi V. For Respondent(s): Ms.Sindhuja M.S. for Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh for R1 & R2 Mr.K.P.Santhosh for R3 Page1 of 4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to disconnect the electricity supply in number 028- 023 -20 provided to the 3rd respondent temple situated at S.No.1111 / 2 B1A located at Annai Sathiya Nagar, Moolakadai, Madavaram, Chennai- 600 110.2. ...
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Vs Muthaiyan Gganesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Rep. by its Authorised officer, Mr.Ashok Kumar, 2nd Floor, PLA Towers, No.30, Gandhi Nagar, Dindigul Main Road, Ponnagar, Trichy 620 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Muthaiyan Ganesan S/o.Muthaiyan, No.4/1010/8, VIP Nagar, Thirunaraiyur Near Temple, Nachiyarkovil, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur 612 602. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the DRT II, to hear and dispose of the Securitisation Application bearing S.A.No.17 of 2025 (filed under Section17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002), on the file of the DRT -II, as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Kishore Balasubramanian For Respondent(s): -ORDER(Order of the Court was made by N...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »