Sree Ganesh Vs The Chairman

Sree Ganesh vs The Chairman

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 26, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1422921
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Mar 26, 2026
Case Number: WP/4993/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sree Ganesh

Respondent

The Chairman

Excerpt

.....are not in a position to pass any orders.4. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents. page2 of 45. admittedly, upon representation made by the petitioner, therespondents called upon the petitioner to provide relevant documents regarding the subject property. since the petitioner failed to provide the same, the respondents were unable to pass any further orders. that part, in the present case, unless otherwise the title is established before the appropriate court of law, the prayer sought for in the writ petition cannot be granted. once the petitioner established his title through the appropriate court thereafter, he can approach the official respondents for the purpose of disconnection or changing the name of the electricity connection.6. in such view of the matter, this writ petition is devoid of merits andthe same is accordingly, dismissed. however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the civil court for work out his remedy, subject to satisfaction of the limitation. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no kkn page3 of 4krishnan ramasamy, j.kkn to tamil nadu generation and distribution corporation limited, anna salai, page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Sree Ganesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Anna Salai,
..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to disconnect the electricity supply in number 028- 023 -20 provided to the 3rd respondent temple situated at S.No.1111 / 2 B1A located at Annai Sathiya Nagar, Moolakadai, Madavaram, Chennai- 600 110. For Petitioner(s): Mrs.Srimathi V. For Respondent(s): Ms.Sindhuja M.S. for Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh for R1 & R2 Mr.K.P.Santhosh for R3 Page1 of 4

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to disconnect the electricity supply in number 028- 023 -20 provided to the 3rd respondent temple situated at S.No.1111 / 2 B1A located at Annai Sathiya Nagar, Moolakadai, Madavaram, Chennai- 600 110.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the

3rd respondent had illegally built a temple in the petitioner’s land and also obtained electricity connection therefore, the petitioner has given a representation to disconnect the electricity connection provided to the 3 rd respondent Temple. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the Official respondents would

submit that subsequent to the petitioner’s representation, the respondents provided sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to provide document relating to the subject property but, the petitioner failed to provide any documents therefore, the respondents are not in a position to pass any orders.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents. Page2 of 4

5. Admittedly, upon representation made by the petitioner, the

respondents called upon the petitioner to provide relevant documents regarding the subject property. Since the petitioner failed to provide the same, the respondents were unable to pass any further orders. That part, in the present case, unless otherwise the title is established before the appropriate Court of law, the prayer sought for in the writ petition cannot be granted. Once the petitioner established his title through the appropriate Court thereafter, he can approach the official respondents for the purpose of disconnection or changing the name of the electricity connection.

6. In such view of the matter, this Writ Petition is devoid of merits and

the same is accordingly, dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for work out his remedy, subject to satisfaction of the limitation. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN Page3 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

KKN To Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Anna Salai, Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sree Ganesh vs The Chairman Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy