Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 26 2026

Kumar Vs Loordhumery (Died) 1. Rosi

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

CMP.No.1573 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.7135 of 2026R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 19 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 26.03.2026 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Mar 26 2026

Arumugham(Died) vs Nithyanandam

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :26/03/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Arumugham (Died) S/o.Rajamanicka Mudaliar, Kamatchi Illam, Zameendhar Garden, Pondicherry. ...Appellant/ 1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.Sarasvathy W/o.Late Arumugam 3.Dhanam 4.Anita 5.Ally 6.Vaithiyanathan S/o.Late Arumugam A1 Died, A2 to A6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st Appellant vide Court Order dated February 26, 2024 made in C.M.P.Nos.3483, 3477 & 3481 of 2024 in S.A.No.1898 of 2003 ... Appellants 2 to 6/Legal Representatives of the deceased 1st Appellant- Arumugham Page No.1 of 6Vs. 1.Nithyanandam 2.Vijayanandam 3.Premanandhan 4.Kaliammal W/o.Arjunan ...Respondents/Appellants/ Defendants 7 to 9 & 11 All are residing at Marakkanam Village, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 5.Chandiran, S/o.Arjunan, 50, Sankaradass Street, Pondicherry. 6.Rajeswari, W/o.Kanthaswamy, 2, Sundara Vinayakar Koil Street, Gingee, Villupuram District. ... Respondents/Respondents...


Mar 26 2026

P. Banumathi, vs S. Ramamurthy

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CRP Nos. 384 & 388 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.2012 & 2022 of 2022 P. Banumathi ..Petitioner in both C.R.P(s) Vs S. Ramamurthy ..Respondent in both C.R.P(s) Prayer in C.R.P.No.384 of 2022 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the Order and decree dated 22-12-2021 in I.A.No.295 of 2016 in O.S.No.30/2013 on the file of Sub Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District and thus render justice.Prayer in C.R.P.No.388 of 2022: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order and decree dated 22.12.2021 in E.A.No.55/2017 in E.P.No.13/2014 in O.S.No.30/2014 on the file of Sub Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajarajan (in both C.R.Ps) For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Vijayarajan For Mr.V.R.Appaswamee (in both C.R.Ps) Page1 of 7COMMON ORDERC.R.P.No.384 of 2022 h...


Mar 26 2026

A.M.Babu vs Wahida Begum

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and C.M.P.No.7606 of 20221. A.M.Babu2. A.Afsal3. A.Aslam4. A.Shanavas5. Madhina6. Ramanth7. Rizu8. Shabeena9. Zahada 10.Jafar ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Wahida Begum2. A.K.Basha A.Sardar (Died)3. A.Shahin4. Salma Page1 of 45. Niyamathulla Khan6. Udhaya Geetha7. C.Subramani8. K.Munisamy..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., praying to set aside the orders of the Learned Additional District Judge of Krishnagiri dated 22.11.2021 in IA.No. 5 of 2021 in OS.No. 64 of 2019. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Nicholas For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Murali (For R6) No appearance (For R7 & R8) Not Ready in Notice RR1 to R5ORDERThe present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the orders of the Learned Additional District Judge of Krishnagiri dated 22.11.2021 in IA.No. 5 of 2021 in OS.No. 64 of 2019.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learne...


Mar 26 2026

Durga Vs The Secretary

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Durga W/o.Babu, No.4, Bharathiyar Street, Periyar Nagar, Pallikaranai, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 100. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The SecretaryRespondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the accordance with law, within a stipulated time For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for R1 & 2 Mr.G.Suresh Kumar, for R3ORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the accordance with law.2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent would submitthat in the prayer of the present case, the petitioner had requested an opportunity of hearing before determining compensation for the land acquired by them. By referring the counter, he would submit tha...


Mar 26 2026

A.Munisamy, Vs The Women and Child Development Department,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA A.Munisamy, S/o.M.Arumugam, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Women and Child Development Department, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, No.1, kamarajar salai, New Saram, puducherry - 605 013. ..Respondent(s)This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant payment of wages as determined by the 3rd respondents to grant payment of wages as determined by the 3rd respondent commission and approved by the 2nd respondent in the ID.No.01/PWC/2015 dated 24.10.2018 to the petitioner for his service as counsellor in the 3rd respondent commission from 15.09.2014 till July 2023 with penal interest. For Petitioner(s): Mrs. S.MeenakshiFor Respondent(s): Mrs. G. Djealany, Gov. Advocate (Pondy.) Page1 of 4ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the above writ petition and he has...


Mar 26 2026

Rajesh Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

Crl.M.P.No.5475 of 2026 and Crl.A.Sr.No.6239 of 2026Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andSUNDER MOHAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for the respondent and having regard to the reasons set out in the condonation petition, does not very seriously object to the delay.2. Hence, and having regard tothe reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 236 days in filing the Criminal Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 26.03.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Mar 26 2026

A.Anandan vs the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN A.Anandan S/o.N.Ambikapathi, No.1/345, Old Agaragharam Street, Alangiyam Post, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Inspector Of Police Central Crime Branch, Vepery,Chennai. Cr.No.Not Known Of 2016 ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner(s) on bail, in the event of arrest, pending investigation in CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.J.Franklin For Respondent(s): Mr. P. Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police, the complaint given in this case was closed. Page1 of 32. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. MJS Note:1. Registry is di...


Mar 26 2026

S.a. Joseph (Died), vs the Commissioner

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED W.P.No. 8977 of 2010 and W.M.P.No.1 of 20101. S.A. Joseph (died)2. Elizabeth Joseph3. Rupert Anthony Frances Joseph4. Cecilia Maria Joseph5. Sylvia Mary Joseph, (P2 tO P5 are substituted as legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner vide order dated 03.02.2026 made in WMP.3089/2026 in WP.8977/2010 by ASMJ, MSKJ) ..Petitioners Vs1. The Commissioner Chennai 600 003.2. The Assistant Commissioner Adayar, Chennai 600 0203. The Executive Engineer4. The Assistant Executive Engineer Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041 Page1 of 45. The Assistant Engineer, (Besant Nagar Division), Tamil Nadu Housing Board, No.63, Dr.Muthu Lakshmi Road, Venkata Rathinam Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600020. (R5 impleaded vide order dated 03.02.2026 made in WMP.20947/2019 in WP.8977/2010 by ASMJ, MSKJ) ..RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constit...


Mar 26 2026

M/S.Hexagon Nutrition (Exports) Pvt Ltd vs the Joint Commissioner of G ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and M/s.Hexagon Nutrition (Exports) Pvt Ltd, Rep. by its Director: Vikram Arun Kelkar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Joint Commissioner of GST and C.Ex. Appeals II, O/o.Commissioner of GST and C.Ex, (Appeals II), Newry Towers, 2054-I Block, 2nd Avenue, 12th main road, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.190/2021 (DIN No.20210659KU00002202FE) dated 08.06.2021 passed by the 1 st Respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.A.Mudimannan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Santhanaraman, Senior Standing Counsel Page1 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bund...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial