Durga Vs The Secretary

Durga vs The Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 26, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1420715

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1420715
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Mar 26, 2026
Case Number: WP/4853/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Durga

Respondent

The Secretary

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 26-03-2026coramthe honourable mr justice krishnan ramasamy durga w/o.babu, no.4, bharathiyar street, periyar nagar, pallikaranai, sholinganallur, chennai-600 100. petitioner(s) vs1. the secretaryrespondent(s) prayer writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the accordance with law, within a stipulated time for petitioner(s): no appearance for respondent(s): mr.p.sathish, agp for r1 & 2 mr.g.suresh kumar, for r3orderthis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the accordance with law.2. there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.3. on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent would submitthat in the prayer of the present case, the petitioner had requested an opportunity of hearing before determining compensation for the land acquired by them. by referring the counter, he would submit that the respondents had provided sufficient opportunities prior to the determination of compensation and that may be a reason for non-appearance of the petitioner. hence, he prays for dismissal of this petition.4. the above submission of the respondents is hereby recorded. this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no cost. nsa index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the secretary krishnan ramasamy j. nsa

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Durga W/o.Babu, No.4, Bharathiyar Street, Periyar Nagar, Pallikaranai, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 100. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Secretary
Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the accordance with law, within a stipulated time For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for R1 & 2 Mr.G.Suresh Kumar, for R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the accordance with law.

2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit

that in the prayer of the present case, the petitioner had requested an opportunity of hearing before determining compensation for the land acquired by them. By referring the counter, he would submit that the respondents had provided sufficient opportunities prior to the determination of compensation and that may be a reason for non-appearance of the petitioner. Hence, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

4. The above submission of the respondents is hereby recorded. This writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cost. nsa Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Secretary KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Durga vs The Secretary Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy