Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Susil Adam Seelan vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Susil Adam Seelan . ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by:The Inspector Of Police District Crime Branch Kancheepuram Cr.No.138 Of 2011 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner(s) on bail, in the event of arrest, pending investigation in CR.NO.138 OF 2011 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P. Krishnan For Respondent(s): Mr. P. Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that already charge sheet has been filed and the same was taken on file before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tambaram in C.C. No.53 of 2024 and this petition becomes infructuous. Page1 of 32. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructu...
Ravi Vs State Represented by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Ravi S/o.Natesan, No. 143, 5th Ward, Valluvar Street, Varagurpettai, Chidambaram-Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Crime No. 04/2019. ..Respondent(s) PYAYER: This petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed upon the petitioner by the Learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under POCSO act 2012, Cuddalore, by a Judgment dated 28.11.2024 made in Spl.SC.No.89 of 2019 and release him on bail. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Kannadhasan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA(Crl.Side) Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.2. In view of the above submission, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Neutral Citation: Yes/No DN To1. The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public ...
K.Jeyaseeli Vs K. Josephsureshkumar alias Suresh Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
AND (Order of the Court was made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 2653 days in re-presenting the appeal in C.M.A.SR.No.89177 of 2016.2. It is seen from the records that yet another appeal had been filed inC.M.A.No.2318 of 2019. In this appeal, the Registry had returned the papers stating that cause title requires amendments. It is seen from the affidavit that it had been consistently re-presented, but again it was returned and again re- presented. In the meanwhile, the counsel had also been changed. Therefore, the appellant cannot be faulted for the delay in re-presenting the appeal. An opportunity will have to be granted to the appellant to present her case in the Court and the same has to be examined on merits.3. Taking all factors into consideration, the delay in re-presenting the appeal is condoned. AND Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same along with C.M.A.No.2318 of 2019 on 16....
R.IIlango alias Sathish Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
in This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 150 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel for the respondent has got objection in allowing the application.4. The petitioner would aver that the Award was passed on 29.04.2025and the award amount has yet to be deposited. Due to financial constraints, the petitioner is not in a position to arrange funds for the payment of court fees. Hence, a delay of 150 days has occurred in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. Mac mac in...
National Insurance Co Ltd Vs A. V. Prajwal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
CMP.No.6614 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.154821 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 3 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 26.03.2026 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Sangeethkumar, vs State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR1. V.Sangeethkumar2. E.S.Saravanan3. C.Singaravel4. C.Navasakthi5. P.Rajavel6. T.Senthil ... Petitioners vs1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government,2. Director of School Education,3. Joint Director of School Education,4. E.Chandravadanam(R4 Impleaded as per Orderdated 30.04.2013 by VRSJ in M.P.2 of 2013in W.P.No.11995/2013) RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners for regularization of their services as Computer Instructors considering their long number of years of service and teaching experience and pass orders. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Thendral for M/s.C.S.Associates For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate for R1 to R3 : No Appearance for R4ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause...
N.Babu, Vs Kiransai M,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
CMP.No.1904 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.52844 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 295 days in paying the deficit court fee in the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 295 days in paying the deficit court fee is hereby condoned. 26.03.2026 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
D.Muralidharan vs the State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. D.Muralidharan S/o.P.K.Damodaran2. P.K.Damodaran S/o.P.Karuppiah Dadar (late)3. Mrs.Lakshmi W/o.P.K.Damodaran, All are residing at Old No.174/1 (New No.50) M.S.Koil Street, Rayapuram, Chennai - 13 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Inspector Of Police, W-14 All Women Police Station, Tiruvotriyur, Chennai 19. [Cr.No.Not Known Of 2015] ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner(s) on bail, in the event of arrest, pending investigation in CR. No. NOT KNOWN OF 2015 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent(s): Mr. P. Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel Page1 of 3 appearing for the petitioner would submit that the issue raised in this petition becomes infru...
S.Elangovan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.Elangovan S/o.Subramani No.2/161, Perumal Koil Street Thatchur, Punchetty Post Ponneri Taluk Thiruvallur District- 601 204. Petitioner(s) Vs The District Collector Thiruvallur and 4 others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Muthukumarappa For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate Mr.V.Prakash Senior Counsel For M/s.Shubharanjani Ananth for R5ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This matter is listed today under the caption "for being mentioned" to bring to our notice that in the order dated 26.03.2026, the name of counsel for fifth respondent was not shown in the cause title.2. The name of Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth shall be shown as counsel for fifth respondent in the cause-title.3. Corrected order be uploaded and certified copy, on demand, may be issued...
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Coastal Energen Private Limite ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in T.C.A.No.SR 3754 of 2026 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central 1 Chennai. Appellant(s) Vs Coastal Energen Private Limited Shri Radhakrishnan Dharmarajan No.31, Krishna, 1st Avenue 100ft Road, Ashok Nagar Chennai 083. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr. D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar Senior Standing CounselORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the application seeking condonation of delay of 9 days in filing the appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned.3. Application is allowed.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal and list for admission on 10.04.2026.5. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for appellant shall filevakalat nama duly signed by the Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Income Tax, as the case may be. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIK...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »