Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
1. V.Sangeethkumar
2. E.S.Saravanan
3. C.Singaravel
4. C.Navasakthi
5. P.Rajavel
6. T.Senthil ... Petitioners vs
1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government,
2. Director of School Education,
3. Joint Director of School Education,
4. E.Chandravadanam
(R4 Impleaded as per Order
dated 30.04.2013 by VRSJ in M.P.2 of 2013in W.P.No.11995/2013) … Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners for regularization of their services as Computer Instructors considering their long number of years of service and teaching experience and pass orders. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Thendral for M/s.C.S.Associates For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate for R1 to R3 : No Appearance for R4
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs.
Speaking order / Non-speaking order
Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dh To
1. The Secretary to Government,
2. The Director of School Education,
3. The Joint Director of School Education,
T. VINOD KUMAR, J.
dh