Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V.Sangeethkumar, vs State of Tamil Nadu,

V.Sangeethkumar, vs State of Tamil Nadu,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 26, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1414432

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11995/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Sangeethkumar,

Respondent

State of Tamil Nadu,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 08.01.2026coram:the honourable mr. justice t.vinod kumar1. v.sangeethkumar2. e.s.saravanan3. c.singaravel4. c.navasakthi5. p.rajavel6. t.senthil ... petitioners vs1. state of tamil nadu rep. by its secretary to government,2. director of school education,3. joint director of school education,4. e.chandravadanam(r4 impleaded as per orderdated 30.04.2013 by vrsj in m.p.2 of 2013in w.p.no.11995/2013) … respondentsprayer: writ petitions are filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners for regularization of their services as computer instructors considering their long number of years of service and teaching experience and pass orders. for petitioners : mr.s.thendral for m/s.c.s.associates for respondents : mrs.p.rajarajeswari government advocate for r1 to r3 : no appearance for r4orderthe learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and has also made an endorsement to that effect. thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.2. recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. no costs.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no dh to1. the secretary to government,2. the director of school education,3. the joint director of school education,t. vinod kumar, j.dh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

1. V.Sangeethkumar

2. E.S.Saravanan

3. C.Singaravel

4. C.Navasakthi

5. P.Rajavel

6. T.Senthil ... Petitioners vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government,

2. Director of School Education,

3. Joint Director of School Education,

4. E.Chandravadanam

(R4 Impleaded as per Order

dated 30.04.2013 by VRSJ in M.P.2 of 2013in W.P.No.11995/2013) … Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners for regularization of their services as Computer Instructors considering their long number of years of service and teaching experience and pass orders. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Thendral for M/s.C.S.Associates For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate for R1 to R3 : No Appearance for R4

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dh To

1. The Secretary to Government,

2. The Director of School Education,

3. The Joint Director of School Education,

T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

dh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial