Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s.Welmech Engineering company pvt Ltd Vs The Chief works manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 4609 OF 2023,WMP NO. 4606 OF 2023 M/s.Welmech Engineering Company Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Preetham Kumar, Developed Plot No. 11A/1, SIDCO Industrial, Estate, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 098. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Chief Works Manager, 2.The Chief Mechanical, Railway Offices Complex, Tilak Bridge, New Delhi - 110 002. Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondent 1 to 3, their men or anyone acting on their behalf from in any manner seek realization of bank guarantee dated 06.06.2020 vide No. 0505620BG000590 for Rs.12,41,400/- furnished by the petitioner for the contract dated 02.11.2018 which is absolutely unilateral, illegal and unlawful.For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.S.Rajamohan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Chandrasekaran, Special Government Pleader For R...
U.P.Swaminathan Vs Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA U.P.Swaminathan S/o.Late.A.Parthasarathy, Residing at No.3/9A, GKS Nagar, Sulur, Coimbatore-641 402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar I.A.S., Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.2. P.Ponniah, I.A.S., Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. ..Contemnor(s)PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to issue summon and punish the Respondent No.1 and 2 for their act of Contempt of Court deliberately disobeying the order in W.P. No.32284 of 2024 dated 30.10.2024 passed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar For Contemnor(s): Mr.T.Chandrasekaran,SGP Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, it is informed by the learned counsel for t...
G.Sundaresan vs Mr.H.Batcha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN in G.Sundaresan ..Petitioner Vs Mr.H.Batcha ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 320 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to permit the petitioner to compound the offence in Crl.R.c.no.354 of 2016 concerned in C.C.No.6 of 2012 by the Fast Track Judge, Alandur by order dated 06.10.2012 and set aside the conviction passed andconfirmed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpet by orderdated 22.12.2015. For Petitioner: Mr.N.Bhaskaran For Respondent: Mr.P.EzhilarasanORDERThis petition has been filed seeking permission to compound the offence.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page1 of 33. Though this Court had earlier dismissed the Criminal RevisionPetition by order dated 07.09.2016, subsequently, the petitioner has settled the entire cheque amount to the respondent. Th...
Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs K.Pasupathy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., Motor 3rd Party Claim Office, Plot No.5, 1st Floor, Ramachandran Street, Saravanan Nagar, Seevaram, Perungudi, Chennai-600 096. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. K.Pasupathy2. V.Prabhu ..Respondent(s)To Condone the delay of 173 days in paying deficit court fee of Rs.39,500/- in the above C.M.A.Sr.No.16151 of 2025. For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Dhakshnamoorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.V.TamilamudhuORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant made the following endorsement and in fact, he has withdrawn even the appeal which has been filed in the SR stage. Page1 of 3 As per the instruction of the Insurance Company, the appeal is withdrawn in CMP No.7814 of 2026 in CMA SR No.16151 of 2025. 2.In view of that particular fact, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn...
Venkatesh Vs The State by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR1. Venkatesh2. Althap3. Dhanvanth4. Naveen Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State by Inspector of Police Chengalpattu District.Crime No. 4051/2020.2. Ayyam Perumal..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNS, pleased to call for the records in FIR in Crime No. 4051/2020 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Samuel Raja For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by M/s.Harshana.TORDERThe Criminal Original Petition was filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No. 4051 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the first accused is a history sheeter and the fourth accused has one previous case. He further submitted that the investigation is in its final st...
Ampeth Kumar. M Vs DR.B.Chandra Mohan and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI M.Ampeth Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnors Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Respondents for committing grave contempt and gross disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.48853 of 2025 dated 18.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Ms.N.Kavitha Rameshwar For Contemnor(s): Ms.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.C.Kathiravan for R3 Page1 of 4ORDERFor non-compliance of the order of this Court, dated 18.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.48853 of 2025, the contempt petition is filed.2. Today, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learnedSpecial Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submitted that, the order of this Court dated 18.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.48853 of 2025 has been complied with.3. In view of ...
E.Lakshmi, vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP.No.5702 of 2024 E.Lakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs5. J.Mahendran, (R5-impleaded As Per Order Dated 01.07.2024 in WMP.11406/2024 In WP.5185/2024 by NSKJ) ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings in his Na.Ka.Aa.7/791350/2023, dated 30.11.2023, on the file of the second respondent herein and to quash the same, and direct the respondents to restore or reissue the patta No. 672, issued by the fourth Page1 of 4respondent or issue appropriate orders or assignment in favour of the petitioner in respect to the vacant plot in Survey No. 8/55 in Vazhuthavur Village, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District, to an extent of 00118 sq.mtr. within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honorable Court For Petitioner(s): Ms.Elizabeth Ravi For Re...
S.Gubenthiran Vs The Zonal officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ S.Gubenthiran : Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600060 : RespondentPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceeding of the respondent in Che.Ma.M.A3.Na.Ka.Ka No.A2/4115/2017 dated 07/12/2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to provide employment to the petitioner under compassionate appointment.For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Gopinath, Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 12.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed on 27.03.2026 under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecutio...
The Branch Manager Vs Annammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
CMP No.7650 of 2026 in CMA SR.No.183052 of 2025 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AND K.RAJASEKAR.J., (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) Dispensed with for the present. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) 27.03.2026 sli 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.T.Chandrasekharan vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4997 of 2023 and Crl.MP.Nos.3123 & 3125 of 2023 V.T.Chandrasekharan ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by Guindy, Chennai 600 032 ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in CC.No.398 of 2022, now pending trial on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvallur, quash the proceedings. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Haroon for M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate(crl.side)ORDERThis criminal original petition has been filed praying to quash the proceedings in CC.No.398 of 2022 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvallur2. When this Court is about to dismiss this criminal originalpetition since no case is made out to quash the impugned proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw this criminal or...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »