Rajendiran and 2 Others Vs Jagadeesan and 11 Others

Rajendiran and 2 Others vs Jagadeesan and 11 Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1489897

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1489897
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice a.D.Maria Clete
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: A/5514/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajendiran and 2 Others

Respondent

Jagadeesan and 11 Others

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble dr.justice a.d.maria clete in o.p.no.760 of 20241. rajendiran and 2 others s/o.late mr.k.a.kannaia achari,2. b.srinivasan s/o.late mr.bhoologam, no.22/11, manickam maistry street,3. b.sekar s/o.late mr.bhoologam, ..applicant(s) vs1. jagadeesan and 11 others s/o.late mr.k.a.kannaia achari,2. karunakaran s/o.late mr.kameswaran, no.13/22, manickam maistry streety,3. k.haridoss s/o.late mr.kameswaran, page1 of 5 no.80/2, chetty street,4. muthulakshmi w/o.mr.arumugam achari, d/o.late mr.k.a.kannaia achari, 14, gazette begum street,5. s.usharani w/o.mr.subramaniyan, d/o.late mr.k.a.kannaia achari, no.10/11/1, padavatta amman koil street, chindadripet, chennai - 600 002.6. mr.c.meignanam s/o.chandrasekar7. mrs.rukkumani8. mrs.hemavathi9. mrs.padmavathi 10.mrs.premavathi 11.umamaheshwari 12.mr.punniyakoti s/o.chandrasekar, all are residing at no.37, kottaikadu village, cheiyur taluk, kancheepuram district...respondent(s) to implead the respondents 6 to 12 as respondents 6 to 12 in page2 of 5 o.p.no.760 of 2024. for applicant(s): no appearance for respondent(s): cn-batta sr.no 4917/2026 returned on 16.02.2026orderwhen the matter was listed for hearing on 11.03.2026, there was no representation for the applicant, hence, registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 30.03.2026 (i.e.,) today. when the matter is called today there is no representation for the applicant and hence it is clear and evident that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application.2. hence, this application is dismissed for non prosecution. no costs. 30-03-2026 index: yes/no dpq page3 of 5dr.a.d.maria clete, j.dpq in o.p.no.760 of 2024 30-03-2026 page4 of 5 page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in O.P.No.760 of 2024

1. Rajendiran and 2 Others S/o.Late Mr.K.A.Kannaia Achari,

2. B.Srinivasan S/o.Late Mr.Bhoologam, No.22/11, Manickam Maistry Street,

3. B.Sekar S/o.Late Mr.Bhoologam, ..Applicant(s) Vs

1. Jagadeesan and 11 Others S/o.Late Mr.K.A.Kannaia Achari,

2. Karunakaran S/o.Late Mr.Kameswaran, No.13/22, Manickam Maistry Streety,

3. K.Haridoss S/o.Late Mr.Kameswaran, Page1 of 5 No.80/2, Chetty Street,

4. Muthulakshmi W/o.Mr.Arumugam Achari, D/o.Late Mr.K.A.Kannaia Achari, 14, Gazette Begum Street,

5. S.Usharani W/o.Mr.Subramaniyan, D/o.Late Mr.K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.10/11/1, Padavatta Amman Koil Street, Chindadripet, Chennai - 600 002.

6. Mr.C.Meignanam S/o.Chandrasekar

7. Mrs.Rukkumani

8. Mrs.Hemavathi

9. Mrs.Padmavathi 10.Mrs.Premavathi 11.Umamaheshwari 12.Mr.Punniyakoti S/o.Chandrasekar, All are residing at No.37, Kottaikadu Village, Cheiyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

..Respondent(s) To implead the Respondents 6 to 12 as Respondents 6 to 12 in Page2 of 5 O.P.No.760 of 2024. For Applicant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Cn-batta Sr.No 4917/2026 Returned On 16.02.2026

ORDER

When the matter was listed for hearing on 11.03.2026, there was no representation for the applicant, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 30.03.2026 (i.e.,) today. When the matter is called today there is no representation for the applicant and hence it is clear and evident that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application.

2. Hence, this application is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 30-03-2026 Index: Yes/No DPQ Page3 of 5

DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

DPQ in O.P.No.760 of 2024 30-03-2026 Page4 of 5 Page5 of 5

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Rajendiran and 2 Others vs Jagadeesan and 11 Others Same Judge Honourable Dr.Justice a.D.Maria Clete