Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandru Male 30 Yrs vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1.Chandru 2.Venkatesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.By Inspector Of Police, D4, Zam Bazaar Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.Not known of 2017) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal original petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C to enlarge the petitioner(s) on bail, in the event of arrest, pending investigation in Crime No.Not known of 2017 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the complaint was enquired into under the CSR No.77 of 2017 and the matter was subsequently closed on 02.04.2017. Therefore, no FIR has been registered Page1 of 3 against the petitioner.2. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No dpa To 1.The learned XIII Metropolit...
Manju Foundations Pvt Ltd vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
2026:MHC:1320IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Manju Foundations Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Kumar, No.8, Sapthaswara Apartment, 1st Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai- 83. ..Petitioner Vs5. Deepasurana6. N.K.Surana7. Dhineshsurana ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3 rd respondent to remove the Page1 of 4encroachments in Survey No.438/1 with an extent of 0.95.0 Hec., Survey No.438/4 with an extent of 0.45.0 hec. and Survey No.439 with an extent of 2.51.0 Hec of Keezhpudhpattu villgae, Tindivanam Taluk, Vilupuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.Titus Knock For Respondents: Mr. T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4 No appearance for R5 to R7ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the encroach...
Lokaramudu vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
2026:MHC:1316IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and WMP.No.27698 of 2024 Lokaramudu ..Petitioner Vs ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the order in Na.Ka. same as illegal and irregular and further direct the respondents to allot the land situated at S.No.40/3 to an extent of 0.19 cents as alternative land for prior acquisition of the land situated at S.No.40/3 in Shoolagiri, Krishnagiri District admeasuring 0.19 cents.Page1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.A.G.Veda Vikas for Mrs.V.Srimathi For Respondents: Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl. Govt. PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the final notice issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.2. The learned Additional Government...
M/S.Winstar Exim Pvt Ltd., vs the General Manager (Recovery)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 26736 OF 2023 M/s.Winstar Exim Pvt Ltd., Rep By Its Director Ms.K.Ganapathy Raman, Plot No.106, Alex Nagar B Colony, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai- 600 051. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The General Manager (recovery)Corporate Office, Indian Bank, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Chennai- 600 014. 2.The Assistant General Manager Armb, Indian Bank, No.55, Second Floor, Ethiraj Salai, Chennai- 008. 3.The Zonal Manager Recovery Department, Indian Bank, No.55, Second Floor, Ethiraj Salai, Chennai- 008. 4.The Branch Manager Indian Bank, Guindy Branch, Sidco Building, Chennai- 600 032. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to re- credit the already deposited money of Rs.13,70,000 /- deposited on 09.09.2021, towards OTS upfront payment, back into the No Lien Account No. 422159631...
S.Dharmalingam vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
2026:MHC:1317IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and WMP.Nos.28358 & 28360 of 2024 S.Dharmalingam ..Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Secretary to the Government, Department of Public Works, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector, Salem District, Collectorate, Salem 636 001.3. The Tahsildar, Vazhapadi Taluk,4. The Revenue Inspector, Karipatti, Valappadi Taluk, ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the undated impugned show cause notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 issued by the 4 th respondent and quash the Page1 of 5 same and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of his property in survey No. ...
K.Tishwanth Vs Cherandhayan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Tishwanth ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the Respondent for having committed Contempt of Court for disobeying the Order made in W.P.No.10403 of 2023 dated 05.04.2023 in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Rajasekar For Contemnor(s): Mr.C.Gauthamaraj Government AdvocateORDERWhen this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that in compliance to theorder made in W.P.No.10403 of 2023 dated 05.04.2023, order dated 05.12.2025Page1 of 4 has been passed by the respondent. A copy of the same has also been produced before this Court.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the respondent dated 05.12.2025, if he is aggrieved...
Swami Dairies vs the Chief General Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 31166 OF 2023 Swami Dairies Rep. By Its Proprietor G.Sasikala Kilakku Kadu, Singipuram Salem District 636 115 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Chief General Manager Canara Bank Circle Office Teynampet Chennai 600 018 Sarala Vidhyalaya School Campus, II Floor, Fairlands, Salem 636 016 Respondent(s) PRAYERWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to process the loan application pursuant to the eligibility letter issued by the National Dairy Development Board vide proceeding AB / RGM / BMF / 3681 dated 26.07.2023 and Tamilnadu Livestock Development Agency vide Application No. NLM 20230306000116dated 06.03.2023 and consequently to sanction the loan to the petitioner in orderto implement the pending projects with the help of National Dairy Development Board and Tamil Nadu Livestock Development agency based on the petition...
P.V.Muniappan Vs The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.V.Muniappan S/o.Venkataraman, No.69, Kallavi Village, Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Revenue Officer3.G.Shanthi W/o.Ganesan, Kallavi Village, 4.K.Raja S/o.Kandasamy, Kallavi Village, Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prarying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 21.07.2022 within the time frame that me fixed by this Honorable Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arokia Mani Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 & 2 Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan, for R3 & 4ORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 21.07.2022.2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for therespondents would submit that based on the petitioner's representation, the DRO has conducted ...
M.Duraisamy vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 30237 OF 2023 M.Duraisamy No. 2/232, Maravan Thottam Velampatti P.K. Palayam Post Tiruppur Taluk Tiruppur District 641 665 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector (r5-impleaded As Per Order Dated 03.07.2024 In Wmp.18009/2024 In Wp.30591/2023 By Asmj) Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd Respondent from putting up any construction or contained just in front of the petitioners property situated in Survey No 23/ B / 1A at North Avinashi Palayam Village, Velampatti Tiruppur South, Tiruppur District, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to relocate the Avinashi Toll Plaza at NH 381 as per the proceedings of the District collector dated 27.04.2023 in Ref. No 3129 / 2022 /B3For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R1 & 3 Mr.Su...
K.Yakoob, Vs The General Manager,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR K.Yakoob ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 2.The Secretary, 3.The Registrar of ..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 3 return amounts deducted from the petitioner's salary and paid over to the 2nd respondent after 19.7.2014 together with interest.For Petitioner : Mr.K.B.Rohith for Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondents : Mr.Aswin for R1 Standing Counsel Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal for R3 Additional Government Pleader No appearance for R2ORDERMr.K.B.Rohith, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Gururaj, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the case. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,this writ petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »