Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Yakoob, Vs The General Manager,

K.Yakoob, vs The General Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1485629

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/16643/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Yakoob,

Respondent

The General Manager,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice t. vinod kumar k.yakoob ..petitioner vs. 1.the general manager, villupuram, villupuram district. 2.the secretary, 3.the registrar of ..respondents prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 3 return amounts deducted from the petitioner's salary and paid over to the 2nd respondent after 19.7.2014 together with interest.for petitioner : mr.k.b.rohith for mr.r.gururaj for respondents : mr.aswin for r1 standing counsel mr.l.s.m.hasan fizal for r3 additional government pleader no appearance for r2ordermr.k.b.rohith, learned counsel representing mr.r.gururaj, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the case. he also made an endorsement to that effect.2. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no msv to1. the general manager, 4.villupuram, villupuram district.2. the secretary,3. the registrar oft. vinod kumar, j.msv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR K.Yakoob ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 2.The Secretary, 3.The Registrar of ..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 3 return amounts deducted from the petitioner's salary and paid over to the 2nd respondent after 19.7.2014 together with interest.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.B.Rohith for Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondents : Mr.Aswin for R1 Standing Counsel Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal for R3 Additional Government Pleader No appearance for R2

ORDER

Mr.K.B.Rohith, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Gururaj, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the case. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No msv To

1. The General Manager, 4.Villupuram, Villupuram District.

2. The Secretary,

3. The Registrar of

T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

msv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial