The State vs a.Rengarajan

The State vs A.Rengarajan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1487950

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1487950
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice Shamim Ahmed
Decided On: Feb 02, 2026
Case Number: CMP/22948/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State

Respondent

A.Rengarajan

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.22948 of 2025 in w.a.sr.no.122171 of 2025r.suresh kumar, j.andshamim ahmed, j.[order of the court was made by r.suresh kumar, j.] this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 294 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. heard mr.e.veda bagath singh, learned special government pleader for the petitioners.3. ms.a.shanmugapriya takes notice for the 1st respondent and she has no serious objection in allowing the petition. despite notice having been served, none appears for the 2nd respondent.4. having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [r.s.k., j.] [s.s.a., j.] 02.02.2026 kst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.22948 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.122171 of 2025

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

AND

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 294 days in filing the above writ appeal.

2. Heard Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners.

3. Ms.A.Shanmugapriya takes notice for the 1st respondent and she has no serious objection in allowing the petition. Despite notice having been served, none appears for the 2nd respondent.

4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [S.S.A., J.] 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties The State vs A.Rengarajan Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice S...