Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Malarselvi Vs Thanapal

Malarselvi vs Thanapal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1480344

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/20224/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Malarselvi

Respondent

Thanapal

Excerpt

in though the 2nd respondent remains unserved, the 1st respondent is the contesting respondent. the petitioner, who is the decree holder, seeks condonation of a delay of 130 days in preferring the first appeal against the fair and decreetal order, dated 12.12.2024 made in r.e.a.no.4 of 2024.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. the learned counsel for the first respondent has no serious objection to the petition being allowed.4. i have independently gone through the affidavit filed in support of thispetition, and i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered and post this matter on 09.02.2026. jd jd in

Full Judgment

in Though the 2nd respondent remains unserved, the 1st respondent is the contesting respondent. The petitioner, who is the decree holder, seeks condonation of a delay of 130 days in preferring the first appeal against the fair and decreetal order, dated 12.12.2024 made in R.E.A.No.4 of 2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the first respondent has no serious objection to the petition being allowed.

4. I have independently gone through the affidavit filed in support of this

petition, and I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and post this matter on 09.02.2026. jd jd in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Malarselvi vs Thanapal Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales