Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Arivuselvan vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M.Arivuselvan ..Petitioner(s) Vs Page1 of 4 ..Respondent(s)Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the entire records of the 5th respondent dated 28.1.2025 signed by the 5th respondent on 01.02.2025 vide ZHO-IX/ C.NO/ 03182/ 2024 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the birth certificate of the petitioner issued by the 3rd respondent vide Registration No.7412 vide B and D No.40783/ 03 for the No.104815, registered on 01.09.2003, uploaded in the website of Greater Chennai Corporation vide COC / 2003/ 06/ 086/ 007412/0.For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Sivaprakash For Respondent(s): D.B.R.PrabhuORDERToday, a memo dated 02.02.2026 has been filed by the petitioner wherein the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above Writ Petition and the l...
K.Vivekanandhan Vs Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.6035 of 2021 K.Vivekanandhan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Divisional Engineer Highways, Construction and Maintenance,2. T. Sekar,3. Muruganpandian ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to theorder No. Se. Mu. Ka. No. 293 / 2021 / A5 dated 2.2.2021 passed by the 1stRespondent, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to restore and retain the petitioner as Road Inspector Grade - I as per the order of promotion dated 30.11.2015 with all consequential benefits. For Petitioner(s): Ms. H. NANDHINI FOR Mr.R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent(s): MR. T.CHANDRASEKARAN SGP FOR R-1 Mr.R. PREM NARAYANFOR for R2ORDERWhen the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite her best efforts, ...
Gandhi Poongavanam Vs Income Tax Department
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and Gandhi Poongavanam ... Petitioner Vs. INTL Taxn Ward 2(1) Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 having DIN and OrderNo.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2023-24/1051839180(1) dated 01.04.2023 for the A.Y.2016-17 passed by the second respondent and all consequential proceedings arising out of it and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Varun Ranganathan for Mr.Ravi Kannan For Respondents : Ms.C.D.Priya Senior Standing CounselORDERThe learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent order passed under Section 147 read with Section 143(3) on 29.03.2025. He has also filed a memo to that effect and also made an endorsement to that ...
M.D. Muthu vs Govindan @ Govindasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE SA No. 890 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013 M.D. Muthu ..Appellant Vs Govindan @ Govindasamy ..Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C to set aside thejudgment and decree of the 2nd Additional Sub-Court, Tindivanam dated03.04.2012 in A.S.No.101 of 2004 thereby confirming judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam dated 16.06.2004 in O.S.No.14 of 2001. For Appellant: No appearance For Respondent: Mr. N. SureshJUDGMENTWhen the matter was listed for hearing on 29.01.2026, there was no representation for the appellant, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption for dismissal on 02.02.2026 (i.e.,) today. When the matter is Page1 of 3 called today there is no representation for the appellant and hence it is clear and evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the second appeal.2. Hence, this secon...
R.Arunsandosh, vs the General Manager-Cum-
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY & W.M.P.No.10491 of 2024 R.Arunsandosh, S/o. Rock, Christian, Working As Trained Graduate Teacher (English), M.G. Road, Puducherry. Petitioner Vs.1. The General Manager-cum- Arch Bishop Of Pondicherry-Cuddalore Archdiocese, Arch Bishops House, P.O.Box.No. 193,4. L.Sai Radja Chandran (992/2000)No.36, Thambu Naicker Street, Puducherry 605 001. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents 1 and 2 with No.Nil dated 29.01.2024 regarding the enquiry report Page Nos.1/4 submitted by the enquiry officer and the termination order with No.Nil dated 10.02.2024 and the order of the appellate authority with No.Nil dated 14.03.2024 rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to...
P. Selva Ganesh Raja @ P. Ganesh Vs B.KALAIARASAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
CMP.Nos.9930 & 9940 of 2025 & S.A.No.416 of 2023T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.These petitions have been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of second appellant and to implead the petitioners 2 to 5 as the appellants 2 to 5 in the Second Appeal.2. Considering the averments in theaffidavits filed along with these petitions and since the petitioners 2 to 5 are legal representatives of the deceased second appellant and they have to be brought on record, these petitions are Ordered.3. Notice to the newly impleaded appellants and to the unserved respondents in the Second Appeal returnable by 19.02.2026. 02.02.2026 vrc...
M.Lakshmi Vs Govindaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHYM.Lakshmi W/o.Muthusamy @ Nagaraj, Veeriyampati Village, Padapalli Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.Govindaraj The Secretary, D.D.9, Uthangarai Agricultural Producers, Co-op Societies Ltd, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District. 2.Mr.Radhakrishnan The Deputy Registrar to Co-operative Societies, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. 3.Mr.Khantharasu The Deputy Registrar to Co-operative Societies, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. 4.Mr.Lakshmanan S/o. A.Krishnan, H.Echambadi Village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ContemnorsFor Petitioner: Mrs.M.Lakshmi Party in Person For Contemnors: Mr.M.Palaniswamy, for R1 to R4 Page Nos.1/12ORDERThis contempt petition is filed as if it is arising out of C.R.P.(NPD) No.1379 of 2020. The original order, that is kept along with the contempt petition, is an interim order dated 20.10.2020 passed by Honble Mr.Justi...
Sridaran vs a.Sindhiya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 2021 of 2024 and CMP No.10804 of2024 Sridaran, S/o. Dhanapal, 375/592, Nagoor Main Road, Near Indian Bank, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs A.Sindhiya, D/o. Arulprakasam, Now at 101, Cuddalore Main Road, Thiruvennainallur, Villupuram District, previously at. NO.3/6B Aranmanai Street, Tharangampadi, Mayuladurai ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set asidethe Fair order and Decreetal order dated 01-03-2024 made in I.A.No.3/2023 in HMOP.NO.45/2022 on the file of family Court, Nagapattinam. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Murugavel For Respondent(s): Ms.V.Mythili Page1 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the civil revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the lear...
K.B.Vasanth vs Pradeepa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 2143 of 2024 and CMP No.11379 of 2024 K.B.Vasanth S/o. K. Balachandran, No.13/4, Kottavadi Road, Valapady Post and Tk, Salem District 636 115. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Pradeepa, D/o. Krishnan, D.No.4/52, Mattukaran Pudur, Pannapatti, Salem District 636 305. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal orders dated 11.12.2023 passed in IA No.1 of 2023 in HMOP No.461 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Salem. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Mani For Respondent(s): Mr.M.R.JothimanianORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this civil revision petition is arising out of the interim order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in HMOP No.461 of 2023. He further submitts that, now, the original petition in HMOP No.461 of 2023 itself was disposed of and hence, the prayer sought for in this civil revisi...
Union Bank of India vs Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU IN Union Bank Of India Rep.by its Chief Manager, No.152, Mount Road, Chennai-600002. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd.Formerly known as Ruchi Health Foods Limited, No.40/41, East Mada Church Street, Royapuram, Madras-600013 (Amended as per order dated 12.03.2010 in A.No.1287/2010)2. P.Venkatesalu, Proprietor Sri Balaji Enterprises, No.9, M.G.Road, Kumaran Nagar, Padi, Madras-600050 ..Respondent(s) To order Substituted Service of the Summons to the Respondent No.2 through an advertisement in a daily newspaper in The New Indian Express, Page1 of 3 English Edition and Makkal Kural, Tamil Edition Circulating in the Locality of the Respondent No.2. For Appellant(s): M/s.Vinithra Srinivasan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Pravesh for Mr.P.B.Ramanujam for R1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) It is informed that ...
- ‹ Prev
- 647
- 648
- 649
- 650
- 651
- 653
- 654
- 655
- 656
- 657
- Next ›
- Last »