Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Vivekanandhan Vs Divisional Engineer

K.Vivekanandhan vs Divisional Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1423167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/5441/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Vivekanandhan

Respondent

Divisional Engineer

Excerpt

.....to the government pleader, high court of madras, informing that the petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw the writ petition in w.p.no.5441 of 2021.page2 of 53. learned special government pleader further submits that since thepetitioner himself addressed the aforesaid letter to the divisional engineer, that he intends to withdraw the writ petition pending consideration before this court and also in view of the subsequent development i.e., promotion of the petitioner to the post of junior draughting officer from the post of road inspector, the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition would not survive for consideration.4. having regard to the aforesaid submission, since the petitioner hasinstructed his counsel to withdraw the petition and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner himself by letter dated 16.07.2024 sought to withdraw the writ petition, this court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition on account of the subsequent development.5. in view of the above, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-02-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no msv page3 of 5 to1. divisional engineer highways, construction and maintenance,2. t. sekar,3. muruganpandian page4 of 5t.vinod kumar, j.msv and w.m.p.no.6035 of 2021 02-02-2026 page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.6035 of 2021 K.Vivekanandhan ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Divisional Engineer Highways, Construction and Maintenance,

2. T. Sekar,

3. Muruganpandian ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the

order No. Se. Mu. Ka. No. 293 / 2021 / A5 dated 2.2.2021 passed by the 1st

Respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to restore and retain the petitioner as Road Inspector Grade - I as per the order of promotion dated 30.11.2015 with all consequential benefits. For Petitioner(s): Ms. H. NANDHINI FOR Mr.R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent(s): MR. T.CHANDRASEKARAN SGP FOR R-1 Mr.R. PREM NARAYANFOR for R2

ORDER

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite her best efforts, she is not been able to contact the petitioner.

2. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the

respondents on the other hand has placed before this Court, a copy of the letter dated 16.07.2024 addressed by the petitioner to the Divisional Engineer (H), Construction and Maintenance, Tiruvarur intending to withdraw the present writ petition and submits that the Divisional Engineer (H), Construction and Maintenance, Tiruvarur issued proceedings dated 31.01.2026 to the Government Pleader, High Court of Madras, informing that the petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw the writ petition in W.P.No.5441 of 2021.

Page2 of 5

3. Learned Special Government Pleader further submits that since the

petitioner himself addressed the aforesaid letter to the Divisional Engineer, that he intends to withdraw the writ petition pending consideration before this Court and also in view of the subsequent development i.e., promotion of the petitioner to the post of Junior Draughting Officer from the post of Road Inspector, the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition would not survive for consideration.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, since the petitioner has

instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner himself by letter dated 16.07.2024 sought to withdraw the writ petition, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition on account of the subsequent development.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-02-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No MSV Page3 of 5 To

1. Divisional Engineer Highways, Construction and Maintenance,

2. T. Sekar,

3. Muruganpandian Page4 of 5

T.VINOD KUMAR, J.

MSV and W.M.P.No.6035 of 2021 02-02-2026 Page5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial