Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Anandhan, Vs R.Ramya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5626 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.202738 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.The Revision is filed through Power Agent. The factum of Power Agent representing the petitioner is not reflected before the Family Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. I have independently gone through theaffidavit filed in support of this petition to accept the cause title, and I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 (1/2) dna...
S.Ramesh Vs The Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
W.M.P.Nos.5394 and 5399 of 2026 in W.P.No.6889 of 2023 P.T.ASHA,J., W.M.P.No.5394 of 2026 is filed seeking to implead the proposed respondents 4 and 5 as respondents in the above writ petition. W.M.P.No.5399 of 2026 is filed seeking to amend the paragraph Nos.6 and 7 of the affidavit filed in the above writ petition. 3.Heard the learned counsels. 4.Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. 5.The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment. 27.02.2026 srn (1/2) 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
D.Vijayakumar vs B.Kalaivani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN IN D.Vijayakumar S/o. K.Deenadayalan, No.118/3, Subburayan Main Street, 2nd Floor, Nammalwarpet, Chennai - 600 012. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. B.Kalaivani W/o. D.Vijayakumar, D/o.Balakrishnan,2. V. Dharshan (Minor) S/o. D.Vijayakumar, 2nd Petitioner is Rep.by his mother and natural Guardian B.Kalaivani ..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.NIRMAL KUMAR Page1 of 3ORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 508 days in representing the above criminal revision.2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the delay stands condoned on payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, within a period of two (2) weeks from today.4. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 Anu Note: Registry is directed...
M.Jayakumar Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANand W.M.P.No.6748 of 2026 M.Jayakumar S/o.Margabandhu, Melkavanur Village and Post, K.V.Kuppam Taluk, Vellore District. Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Secretary Public Works Department, Secretariate, St. George Fort, Chennai-9 3.The District Collector Vellore District, 4.The Executive Engineer Mel Palaru Vadunila Kottam, 5.The Executive Engineer State High Ways Department, 6.The Tahsildar 7.The Panchayat President Kavanur Panchayat, RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 08.09.2025 made along with village people and stop the proposed construction of underground canal in North side downstream of the lake...
Naveen Kumar O vs the Union Territory of Puducherry
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Naveen Kumar O ... Petitioner Vs. Puducherry. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revive and complete the recruitment process pursuant to Notification No.151-3/ IGMC&RI/Estt./Rec.-Paramed/2014 dated 19.11.2014 or in the alternative to consider the petitioners candidature for appointment to the Post of Lab Technician by granting age relaxation in accordance with Government Order dated 04.02.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.J.N.Naresh Kumar For Respondents : Ms.Sharadha Vivek Additional Government Pleader (P)ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petiti...
N.Bhupesh Vs S.Siva
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Application No.971 of 2026 in Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) Dr.No.17007 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 278 days in representing the case papers in the above petition.2. Heard learned counsel for applicant.3. Satisfied with the reasonsassigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this application is allowed and the delay of 278 days in representing the case papers in the above petition, is condoned. Registry is directed to number the main petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Bhupesh, Vs S.Siva
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Application No.974 of 2026 in Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) Dr.No.17018 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 277 days in representing the case papers in the above petition.2. Heard learned counsel for applicant.3. Satisfied with the reasonsassigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this application is allowed and the delay of 277 days in representing the case papers in the above petition, is condoned. Registry is directed to number the main petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.LENIN Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN V.Lenin S/o. Veeraragavan, No.345, Paper Mills Road, Perambur, ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s) Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of BNSS, praying set aside the order dated 03.09.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.11659 of 2025 on the file of the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai 08 and pleased to direct the Inspector of Police to register the complaint dated 26.04.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/S.M.MANOJKUMAR For Respondent(s): MR.R.VINOTHRAJA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE) Page1 of 4ORDERThe present Revision challenges the dismissal of the petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS., seeking a direction to the police to register an F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner.2. The gist of the petitioners complaint is that the proposed accused hadborrowed a sum of Rs.2,30,000/- in the year 2018; t...
Thalapathi Arunkumar Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.6561, 6563 and 6564 of 2026 Thalapathi Arunkumar S/o.Shanmugavadivel, No.10/303 Kamaraj Street, Avinashi Town, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector 2.The Special Officer/ Block Development Officer (VP) 3.The Tahsildar Sathyamangalam, 4.The President Hasanur Panchayat,5.The Superintending Engineer The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relatingto the impugned Lock and Seal order dated 13.01.2026 in OrderNo.705/2025/B2-17 passed by the 2nd respondent quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondents: Mr.E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon...
DEVENDIRAN Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Devendiran2. D.Chellammal3. Vanjikodi4. D.Nagarajan5. D.Sathish Kumar6. Gayathri Siva7. Sandhiya ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s)To amend the offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of BNS act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of BNS act, order passed by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP.No.750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and thereby render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Devendran For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No. 750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 by including the offence under Sections as 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of BNS Act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of BNS Act. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. In view of the averments adduced i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »