Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

DEVENDIRAN Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Devendiran vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422492

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/3598/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendiran

Respondent

The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice k.rajasekar1. devendiran2. d.chellammal3. vanjikodi4. d.nagarajan5. d.sathish kumar6. gayathri siva7. sandhiya ..petitioner(s) vs the state rep by, the inspector of police ..respondent(s)to amend the offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of bns act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of bns act, order passed by this honourable court in crl.op.no.750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and thereby render justice. for petitioner(s): mr.d.devendran for respondent(s): ms.j.r.archana government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in crl.o.p.no. 750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 by including the offence under sections as 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of bns act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of bns act. page1 of 2k.rajasekar, j.gbi2. in view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. the registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in crl.op.no. 750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and issue fresh copy of the order. further, one week time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditions as directed by this court, from the date on which the order copy made ready.gbi to 1.the state rep by, the inspector of police 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Devendiran

2. D.Chellammal

3. Vanjikodi

4. D.Nagarajan

5. D.Sathish Kumar

6. Gayathri Siva

7. Sandhiya ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s)

To amend the offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of BNS act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of BNS act, order passed by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP.No.750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and thereby render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Devendran For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No. 750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 by including the offence under Sections as 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 324(2), 115(1), 351(2), 74 of BNS Act instead of offences under sections 296(b), 115(1), 351, 74 of BNS Act. Page1 of 2

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

GBI

2. In view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in support of the

petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in Crl.Op.No. 750 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and issue fresh copy of the order. Further, one week time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditions as directed by this Court, from the date on which the order copy made ready.

GBI To 1.The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Devendiran vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales