Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN1. M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association Rep. by its Secretary, Having its office at - New No. 37, Old No. 16, 4th Main Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai 20 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The CommissionerGreater Chennai corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 09 2.The Regional Joint Commissioner, South Region Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 08 Respondent(s)PRAYER To issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to process the Application for Demolition dated 29.11.2025 bearing Reference no. DA/ WDCN13/ 01203/ 2025 and consequentially issue Demolition permission in respect of the Apartment complex known as Rams Pinnacle situate at New No. 37, Old No. 16, 4th Main Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020, on the basis of the Consent letters furnished by more that without insisting on production of Gen...
P.Gowrishankar vs P.Sudha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.R.C. SR.No. 7779 of 2026 Mr.P. Gowrishankar ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs. P. Sudha ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 567 days in preferring the above criminal revision petition. For Petitioner :: Mr.V.S.Senthilkumar For Respondent :: Mr.N.S. Amogh SimhaORDERThis criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 567 days in filing the above revision.SUNDER MOHAN,J.nv2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, the delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) in favour of The Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thi...
Nallammal Vs Velappan (Died), 1. Ettammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 949 of 2026 and CMP No.5154 of 20261. Nallammal, W/o.Boopathi, No.3/34A, Sokkan Kadu, Periyapatti Village, Namakkal Taluk and District.2. Pappathi, W/o. Subramani, D.No.3/160, Kudi Street, Chinnakarasupalayam, Sarkar Valavanthi Village, Mohanur Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Velappan (Died),1. Ettammal, W/o. Late Sengodagounder, No.3/98, Maniyarampudur Village, Thottipatti Panchayat, Namakkal Taluk and District.2. Saravanan, S/o. Velappan, No.3/98, 5th Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Komarapalayam Town and Post, Komarapalayam Taluk,3. Karthik, S/o. Kuppusamy, D.No.2/78D, Mettupalayam, Pillakalathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Page1 of 64. Udhiyarani, W/o. Velappan, No.3/98, 5th Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Komarapalayam Town and Post, Komarapalayam Taluk,5. Kalaipriya, W/o. Karthik,D.No.2/78D, Mettupalayam, Pillakalathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civi...
ANTONY Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKARAntony ... Petitioner -vs- State rep.by:The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.768 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.768 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.12.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 326, 303(2) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.768 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joinedhands with other accused quarried illegally three bags of river sand from Balaru and the same was transported by using t...
JOHN BOSCO (B1924), Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbat ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.6537 of 2026 in W.P.No.6017 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition is filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition.2. This petition is ordered, without Court fee. 26.02.2026 kkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sambath vs V.Velmurugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Sambath S/o.Ponnusamy, No. 1/31, South Street, Kaikalathur Veppanttai Kaikalathur (West), Perambalur, Tamilnadu 621 117. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. V.Velmurugan S/o.Velusamy, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kaikalathur village, Vepanthattai Taluk, Perambalur District2. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Perambalur ..Respondent(s)Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, to cancel the suspension of sentence and cancel the bail granted on 28.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No. 22767/20255 in Crl.A.No. 1318/2025 and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Mohanapriya M For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Nirmal Aditya for R1 Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2 Page1 of 4ORDERThe petitioner is the father of the victim girl in Spl.S.C.No.66 of 2019. 2.The first respondent herein was granted suspension of sentence by this Court by the order dated 28.11.2025 on t...
Dhamodharan Balachandran vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.3476 of 2026 inDhamodhararn Balachandran ... Petitioner Vs. State rep.by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.18 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, to grant extension of time to the petitioner to execute sureties imposed by this Court by an order made in Crl.O.P.No.26605 of 2025 dated 02.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.Sai Suri For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sma To1. The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madra...
M.Sellakannu vs the State Information Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
sIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN1. M.Sellakannu S/o.Muthusamy No.3/PC-5, Kamban street Mogappair west Chennai-600 037 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Information Commissioner Tamilnadu Housing Board J.J.Nagar Division Thirumangalam Chennai-600 101 Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondents to consider the second appeal dated 13.12.2025 expeditiously within stipulated time period and to direct the 1st respondent to forthwith instruct and depute the 2nd respondent to furnish the information and documents sought for in petitioners Three RTI Application dated 11.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.C.Pratheep Ashok Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Vigneshwaran Chandrasekaran for R1ORDERHeard Mr.S.C.Pratheep Ashok Kumar for the petitioner and Mr.C.Vigneshwaran Chandrasekaran for the 1st respondent. 2.Today, when t...
THAHEERA NIHAAL Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Thaheera Nihaal ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, ..Respondent(s) To relax the condition imposed in its order dated 26.12.2025 in Crl.Op.No.35712 of 2025 directing the petitioner to report before the NDPS Court, Chennai daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.35712 of 2025 by order dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the NDPS Court, Chennai, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this Courtin Crl.O.P.No.35712 of 2025 by ...
E.Valarmathi Vs Elangovan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and CMP.No.5545 of 2026 E.Valarmathi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Elangovan Ramanujam Pillai (Died) 2.Kandamani Ammal Kuppusamy (Died) 3.Neelavathiammal 4.Velayutham Pillai 5.Namachivaya Pillai 6.Manickavalli 7.Umadevi 8.Soundravalli 9.Mani 10.Dharabudharan ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4 CRP filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the attachment docket order dated 02.01.2026 made in EP.39 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Kurinjipadi in OS.No.738 of 1991 on the file of the Ld Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.KarthikeyanORDERHeard Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the petitioner.2. The present revision is a challenge to the impugned order dated02.01.2026, in and by which, EA.No.37 of 2025 and EA.No.38 of 2025 were allowed and time for delivery bata was extended by three working days. The petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »