Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhankumar, Vs Vidyapriya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND1. Madhankumar,2. Pandurengan, S/o.Ondachiya Pillai,3. Manoharan,4. Abhinaya, W/o.Manoharan,5. Mahendran, Page1 of 7 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Vidyapriya, D/o.Ganapathy, W/o.Madankumar, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi,2. Minor Aadhvika, D/o.Madankumar, Rrepresented by her natural guardian/mother Repondent No.1, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi, ..Respondent(s)1. Madhankumar,2. Pandurengan, S/o.Ondachiya Pillai, Page2 of 73. Manoharan,4. Abhinaya, W/o.Manoharan,5. Mahendran, ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Vidyapriya, D/o.Ganapathy, W/o.Madankumar, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi,2. Minor Aadhvika,D/o.Madankumar, Rrepresented by her natural guardian/mother Repondent No.1, Page3 of 7 Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi, ..Respondent(s)To withdraw the case in D.V.C. No.33 of 2022 pend...
PRASANTH Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Crl.M.P. No. 3498 of 2026 in Crl.R.C.SR. No. 4124 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN,J.This criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above revision.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for. 26.02.2026 nv (Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise inorder.)https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Devaraj Vs The State, Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Devaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State, Rep by ..Respondent(s) To extension of time for furnishing the surety on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crl.OP.No.27137 of 2025 on 10.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Vinoth Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for furnishing the surety as per the order of this Court in Crl.OP.No.27137 of 2025 dated 10.10.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to furnish the surety as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. GBI To 1.The State, Rep by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2...
The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary vs S Arivuselva ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.2227 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.201763 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 84 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners.3. Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (S.S.A., J.) 26.02.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Abdul Lathif Vs MR. Aftab Rasool, IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M.Abdul Lathif ..Petitioner(s) Vs MR. Aftab Rasool, IAS The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai - 1. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for contempt of court for having violated deliberately and wantonly the order of this Court 17/11/2025 and made in WP No.42327/2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s. I.Kowser Nissar For Contemnor(s): Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, Standing CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of theorder of this Court dated 17.11.2025 in WP No.42327 of 2025.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that theorder dated 17.11.2025 passed in the Writ Petition has been complied with.Page1 of 33. The learned counsel for the petitioner also affirmed the said submission.4. In view of t...
V.BASKAR Vs The state of Tamilnadu rep.by its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in V. Baskar ..Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Inspector of Police, Kairlabath Police Station, Ariyalur District.2. R. Cholarajan ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 140 days in filing the above criminal revision petition. For Petitioner :: Mr.M. Jothi Kumar For Respondents :: Mr.R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 No appearance for R2ORDERThis criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 140 days in filing the above revision.SUNDER MOHAN,J.nv2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Though notice has been served on the 2nd respondent, there is no appearance on his behalf.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.3000/- (Rupees Three Thou...
REVANTH Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.3372 of 2026 Revanth ..Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.14 of 2023)2. Kavitha3. Sanmathi ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in connection with the FIR in Crime No.14 of 2023 pending on the file of the respondent police and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ilamurugu For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.14 of 2023, pending on the file of the first respondent Police. Page1 of 42. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent Police submitted that the investigat...
V.Manimekalai Vs The Directorate of School Education,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.4118 & 4119 of 2026 V.Manimekalai ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Directorate of School Education, Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valagam,1. 2. The Joint Director of School Education1. (Higher Secondary),2. Directorate of School Education,3. Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valagam,4. Chennai-600 006. 5. 3.The Chairman, Teacher Recruitment Board, 3rd and 4th Floor, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.M.G.R. Centenary Building, DPI Campus, College Road, 4.M.Rathish ..Respondents Page1 of 6Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned ineligible list of candidates after CV for the subject Zoology in No.Nil dated 22.01.2026 issued by the 3 rd respondent and the subsequent impugned provisional selection list for the subject Zoology in No.Nil dated 22.01.2026 issued...
Anbazhagan vs the State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN1. Anbazhagan2. Gobu3. Babu ... Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.2329 of 2024Ranjith ... Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.18517 of 2022 Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kariyapattinam Police Station, Nagapattinam District. ...Respondent in both the MPs (Crime No.97 of 2013) Prayer: These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed seeking suspension of sentence imposed on the petitioners by the learned Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, made in S.C.No.32 of 2015 dated 24.08.2021 and release the petitioners on bail. For Petitioners : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian in Crl.M.P.No.2329/24 No Appearance in Crl.M.P.No.18517/22 For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******COMMON ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed seeking suspension of sentence imposed on the p...
Kalaimahal Cements Private Limited, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.No.3853 of 2026 Kalaimahal Cements Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized signatory, Kavitha Ramesh, Having Office at. No.15, Kattukudalore Road, Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore,Tamil Nadu-606 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Virudhachalam Assessment Circle, Cuddalore-606 001. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned blocking of Input Tax Credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger of the Petitioner bearing Reference No.BL3312250000204 dated 05.12.2025, pertaining to the period from 01.10.2025 to 31.12.2025, effected by the Respondent in respect of GSTIN 33AAGCK4135K1ZK, and quash the same, and consequently direct the Respondent to forthwith unblock and restore the Input Tax...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »