Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

PRASANTH Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Prasanth vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1418260

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/3498/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prasanth

Respondent

The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

crl.m.p. no. 3498 of 2026 in crl.r.c.sr. no. 4124 of 2026sunder mohan,j.this criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above revision.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for. 26.02.2026 nv (note to office: registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise inorder.)https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

Crl.M.P. No. 3498 of 2026 in Crl.R.C.SR. No. 4124 of 2026

SUNDER MOHAN,J.

This criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above revision.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for. 26.02.2026 nv (Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in

order.)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Prasanth vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales